娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
.]r&`!},L4esg*K [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人xE;}+g.N,d$}J E

$J%h#FyQa#g+? F 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國#Opf_/nk

$?#FH` j/~ 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子ApaS H3K U&|
h4N n!V yJ
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
/fR?!]/B4c[eQ 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! c tZ5]E j*F

j!B-t:~ z} eXw 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, DK5{J!@ K%?

!OH2{`ac 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! 1xT E&\ V}i

`P-|,IK%Y8w \ 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 n6Jn?*|.}8@BoQ
f7zn&Cnc/V-?^W
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, Ya"m Adq1]

oK DOu9^c 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
%@rtSl OqL 9R*jW@#rw~j#v,P.O
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
8|5l&k d+t*_\p ({AX QcX ~}
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
E RDVc:W [ FU%h;l(t-As,rI
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
f:r S,J-bb*F EK.Y JWc`c W!}Z
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦;Jy/bQt1x.EB
"}r5Erq`"]
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
g f8W:`:t?*T'n!oV qp :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
ldk:w"@!b japan has been very influential nowadays.
-tF|5O(cg4e#L although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
p*r;|*G$E3wi5f$oR japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]LSc }'Y @

h)NMz G)m)K$o&X(Q1a 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
GW AI^o7{#m )eb4G \&~Y
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:V7Y*rRl xOZ
shall we be more reasonable?9}Ho[/K
japan has been very influential nowadays.
N:?6Oy`f although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
N%B0n)U` japan should occupy a place. [/quote]_4t3c#K"^m/_{7E

8foY/b _ {V9vJ$Ls F"n)`@
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
s+W9p%t` iF 日本係好強我絕對認同
.M/Wf_Bavx:L 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
~ C*L Z(F6@ O7` 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,[%v]flC|;k
.adM(u,KS f P
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍), y1i#QN:Ms$iE

*fLkr y8}A 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),h)e4tGS.T+\X ?
-b*j'p x{`3u,`m9U
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
.miB&o,o ms%b8K L2D O}:abene
8HC2R3vm5D KCy,o

-So'j9A;^J{'RG};s 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...2o.^nC+D
日本係好強我絕對認同/M5]9I,_JQ:h M;NP
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...)lm\3wr^
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
P.me)jq0N8d A/G2D"hMQ+k![#K

YpCh gb;_ }*{4f
7_ ]d%Hmg_3EnB?
GIy/Xh i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
4i(j!],Jh` in the next 50 years, japan will decline.4YGz"l(G
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries 0u+z Or-?{(\
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:,YQmD_v9i4|9Pj
;R Ky"y,gp0nP)U
6rmYr,?!S

d!\)fv Fx|Y
)w%{{.sh J v C2M$c6D[y

f6a.}_&N(F%L in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
9D"w)ci w%TU1J [/quote]0y U!k0f0hV#u/p b"n K
3H)L}!G`
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@WLLb4a/ARC_*t

*\-v1L&?0AB 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:$YC K1M'}uVOe"?
[size=6]講到強,1]H1DZ I;b
6| ~,iDY"Cl
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
;dmk5k'w0g BSX#d0G!b.g
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
{l!B.`-U N(rkV }
k-iH3q%I.n9i E 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote](Tj:g3H4TY
&| q$wO"XBns w:wT
`#QLR,I(g9pb
the bro knows quite much of history.
_(Kd!~q[
(O8L,u]%z&` UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.g6V?~-w
;caH)Bv{8I,G5[ T3cC
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
Rg&d2zwBx|*Q %|7C-wjp!v+_4h)C)G
China has a right of veto否決權.
8u4k8FN"U jH6LSY If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
I `9Oq b-u#K the issue will au---atically be banned
s&B _RL@ Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
J5S2YbE|%[%C@ 3C\a)_T B3z`

/j Pq,u&^] 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
f/u*Bm+X'LRz2gr v l R|%X\
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]Q;KrG0Z)bn {
](N4~$y;W~

:D,\hu1?9k4Jz 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
H,v2~(Ib$q :MS aq+p^ k/w
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s~'Z/d.M)k
0D\.? z;o!p
why it is called "Brick" U0?}xb ` ~8N]
8s9{-ACQ
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
p[Sp,U7x_0@
)CL#X~w'PI )m#D i)A_9W2L Qb_+P

3?ha-k\SkMW3E PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.