Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~
Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???金錢可以買到公義;~p0@Y6za
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad: 疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。 人地講左啦~a(H^ h-m x
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過 |'? }z'U
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,}U\o6V-}U]%?'^
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判UnR_ sxn gwZ
that"s alln:?,pv#TGtO d
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]] 寧縱勿枉 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~T+m)T K/{$p8J[,m u
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]+A2Z a X:kr!Nn;N5A c
3C B*F|(^S ]
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。 我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇, v2I+vf C-@
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁r9J L z&W_
(T m }&`H"M!S{
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。” [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:X7f0C K p;h ^
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
.p$ms p}q0\0t"z;`;c
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?gU;W Y"zU,fI
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴2x zX;_1C
JZ3r1a$s6sI
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: b"y_:\u,EH
?2u,H FuUK#|
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。U \9I8V)i7T4O#@
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: v ~ |6zUk
i%Z^l.[J#h4Z u T3~;K
/^ }!B&q/n/m3k6[
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
*s.K:x#g%U7~ m'j
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.1W.ISQpD
Find out the fact before you speak lar.... hello vivi, you beat me to it [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
0F._ ST t y
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
)gC t2e aF6@W
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈$` J ?0yHz"g
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~}I{O[,u
\l-U)W#jw*`,B
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]U!Ir{7Ii [
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D 刑事罪:faP\t'u:h
告人個條友= your goverment (not you)
1E+} H!{|Ku
民事訴訟:
告人個條友 =you [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:^S@1[-e&N:[V5R
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。-_ o"agg3_P!w:p T.J
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。 thank you for your teaching 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM: ?c'b+E b.Z IHs
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
-W4{,R^(xcK
Not always... like this case..
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge 我想聽大家自己的觀點
如果你喜歡qZkB.w I(Yd _8H
您可以加入討論u9N7f#M3Z^B A1x
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
已經代表自己的觀點1A/k7W G3I X,vU
您沒有需要繼續吠&ox g&J:h#J5gm%M+U
THE END
頁:
[1]
2