Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~
Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???金錢可以買到公義
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad: 疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。 人地講左啦~J$ny]1j I}
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童, Pi-|#j3T/Vb/s4_
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判$^#M-\%s tRe
that"s allm!c|+Q}v6L!q?
p A3LV-V o,G [
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]] 寧縱勿枉 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~"nRn zM*\ t9}
,@VTK r
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]vQR;P6p
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。 我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
S:S:s~7F6y p\ j A9K
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。” [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:{1@W3D6hG
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
\by-~7y
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.(Hl8@||I
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
#RZJT"nq#z
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: Q3Wr"Bx(c v;ld
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]u2Jg:@\$Y
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。7Q3xv7W |j
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:7z2O)K5hj*w1^M
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]!kR1Q#i2B#Z!^ tI,FJ
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
Find out the fact before you speak lar.... hello vivi, you beat me to it [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote] R5~orL W I\
z$uj:a(Oh
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈$MYL/|-l"HN9~0f
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
8t w-Y X(lN
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:-y,cWKcR(j l:m"F%}
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]Za6j;`4a'n T
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D 刑事罪:5M\1{"Nm-SQ gV
告人個條友= your goverment (not you)7w Sn5~ m
民事訴訟:|:yDg.N)kp[ W
告人個條友 =you [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
n G Q4Rf w)j
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]3[ J#J6z)z[ i
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。+DjPgHtEB NJ
8O;g v:r a K1H$h/]@B!O
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。 thank you for your teaching 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:!h*uLR5z{X L-I6rV2J
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote] v4s2z#?6R)g
"sVX"b X3f
Not always... like this case.. 5R t3o/zl `
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge 我想聽大家自己的觀點 SdE7oP
如果你喜歡
您可以加入討論
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"G&@4pW r0Hq `7V8x p
已經代表自己的觀點6Y)\ k"x jG(I
您沒有需要繼續吠^3R:_%At)Z
THE END
頁:
[1]
2