娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
,Nuq^H2@Uj 金錢可以買到公義
I$U$n/~t9fU2g*_ 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
b'T
?n:{7N/r2ZI oe*M 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過%ZW!}'URa!R
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童, j*Um S5{8~
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判/R7w`J I`IA*x`
that"s all
Zi;^A"Y&h8@K 5F0rP,N(kb
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
6c:kDt1o9\
.eX1s[omD)u [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
D"U!@7G#BS,DP
Y5J.?Ed!j+HsO_ [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
EM? X4S 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
r)_bq^mXx7G~ 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
L/h"},?+Z 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定E(ct,o6oW9aq,E
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁U8OTrJG7m7x
n-Y[ g.{~1Eo"[
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
eT*a2I1Z$L3VA 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
ne'c(X2r@.s8r!U;T Y
ZMe$p&z 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.?|W9?:M!|
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
"FzvDb? v (hO~M*Qd M#f
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴5]/PIDIJY

A$Ynk:z0c#\ [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:}u1s-Gnb
zO'Mn lw
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
l#qlsy~H'\p;I5} 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
|n`T*n(N#} D }$d~6W T
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:6Lm+]4n;a&x
jX

dLn%fO:p"V8? w4[7oE\5c2r3P
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]UK3\6wv8dC$o

M@$`A9f&p
h8\ This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.T#~c
j6J
MU Q
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
m#{C4x@9M d gke\'BC4ea
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
I l9R~,n{$Q
@Mi ?L7Q(|;~3c.@? 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
{;n$_7MM@ 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
}9_ir![A;J
:_Cq"`x6i ~'D+Bi 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~ Y[ZG9ZT9p@
@]xH3f;W
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:.tFV#g+{$T
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
_+oM9y| haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
4lw#Iz&R oV t#u'Ja 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
6zL.e
b(eXl
GKB?f8A&a 民事訴訟:
\M9MeOWU*[ g 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:j*p9Slea

rPRL%x lj!y"@8w!o4y!c
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
~M*g6soO 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
9H K/Kg!i 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。f3]\ s_Gm#N
u#z`d$U
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:QT;CY&O2Z3h
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
y2Sz3f-u/`1uQ~ky t0n9}'Pu1V
Not always... like this case..
H9z#E/NU or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
#R+}@(Wq 如果你喜歡-I-Y8F!p:x4MZ[%e$i
您可以加入討論6{e^M[!j6JZ
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"O4D'FxB.@3@
已經代表自己的觀點,c-bbx"h
您沒有需要繼續吠o(N @ fg ~G.BpA
THE END

查看完整版本: Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~