|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
7 H# L! X" P- Z* z8 i4 ]+ S" R
6 y/ X5 t0 _6 v0 C: ?
+ A) h3 g* I% K同意.
( n& o0 v. p( R5 V/ c/ b4 L但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 7 |* h+ ~" [$ k; o3 m
: S: H; w6 ]5 S( v2 UI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.& Q9 ~+ U* `* l+ y2 _; C
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
' H, _- `* \5 w! q1 DI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.6 K0 c& _, s" U+ V' x% M
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.% K9 ]6 A7 ^0 J+ Y. ^2 D
) L h, z0 @- O1 {( P5 D1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
. t( _ k' Z- {2 ?2 C2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
$ x$ _7 S0 l- Q) d3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
2 ?4 N/ w0 C( j" v) W- J( p" ]6 B2 F, r
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|