 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.8 o% M& b; _2 u9 S8 b
5 w5 U' @% J9 p; E+ q: D5 vaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! Y! ? p" [! u0 g2 } k8 T7 U
5 U! K( [2 Q6 t% D8 c( o, ?In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
0 V- p! [! P( s4 I d8 a3 uand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.+ c7 }& k. j F& Q6 I; `6 h8 _
; ]. e% Z, o+ x$ j; W
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險1 S0 y, @9 |1 V+ q1 o
& m: U- X+ |: q4 p1 x& A2 ?) Ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, . a1 j4 |6 r0 y K# U+ [
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|