|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
0 y; Y ^$ |: @7 I0 \' h- F5 e
) |( o; k# M" Y* h# @according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
7 |/ g$ y! g `2 T3 `3 k# y& ?0 S
; G/ q. F8 Z+ r% s3 l4 c& nIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
% O9 S: Q8 c! L( |1 t T4 |! t7 ~and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.3 O# Q1 e1 \: T4 r' m
- O8 ~$ I0 f5 J$ B5 @so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險+ M& L* ^" t' K& B* `
- }1 ]' j2 c- _
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, $ M3 s, T* J4 M" r7 j" I0 S- R) K* d& {
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
