|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
+ k% M4 @( ^6 V- m& V# e2 q" H2 y& c( Q( X) M+ J& i8 L
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
0 P+ j! i' ~: `' o7 l- K
2 I" t) t2 t( R) |In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,6 o2 l9 N* K% Y2 c9 M1 O, }
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him./ l1 T% L, [/ h f1 I" U3 ]" x3 l/ M
8 w' P$ |, |9 W( O7 l( o, O sso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
" O0 e- R# I+ w. R8 |9 D4 c2 `4 x' f) G0 F$ }
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, " x- W$ u/ P* _
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
