|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
2 Q9 L! j0 o+ i
6 U# c7 t- d; G$ zaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
2 I+ f4 Z) W, d( d+ m- H: Y8 t$ X i Y0 w
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
" z/ G' v# \# t& v1 pand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.2 K: D3 i- w% U, R
" x: O4 @4 J! F' J% Lso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
6 U; A: A/ A* Y$ [- j4 }" n/ a3 X0 U5 C# L5 [
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
+ h. [% h& c+ ]# Uat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
