|
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
( ^$ e/ J; d) l+ j: @) U% C4 H! Z) d9 C" \! L
; r" @: {- l: j& F: y1 N1 m
同意.& r9 k a8 l" j- L$ o- V
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...
, ?4 c; a8 k+ `" Z, ]: }$ u
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.5 l- y) O) a6 ?2 i& n
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students5 e$ f( E5 ? |1 X9 a+ G
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.1 g* [ G3 d! m/ u
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.) _, O, u& O: \/ c$ ~
1 @3 ]& x _2 v V: _# S; d1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law# n( J7 \& M: E
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper8 \8 a2 U0 Z0 q; m
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
1 Z% \1 W2 W4 ] _7 q1 [+ V* H7 M# X; z8 o, Q* g) K7 l' F. i
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|
