|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
9 t5 h& @7 O0 `2 W$ o/ a& A9 Q R1 Q4 `
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.. `8 F2 T, z) ]& B
$ \! h( ^! g- ]& A2 O
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
' L$ R4 i6 L0 band that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.3 S& Z0 I5 Q& s
* a8 `% V$ ~4 e5 B7 g( x8 K
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
! |0 A: c5 S/ ^( E: \; U9 I6 Q. t( _5 }: k; `: h' c5 Q) I2 o
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
+ w a" ~: t9 l) Dat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
