|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
, n0 i/ v5 e2 z1 l3 g$ j0 v7 V5 B1 p& z
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
, W9 j. B0 o4 c @3 V+ ~1 H. d
_0 g" Y+ Z/ ^0 a9 y9 q O6 SIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
9 M+ |: K6 `( D( d& \% kand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
4 f3 f7 \2 @. \5 z5 S9 v$ _1 S8 W- c- y; ]. ]6 s1 a4 P
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
6 q N9 {5 A# {6 H2 B2 l: z$ o1 \6 a) e8 ^* A
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, - z. [ }5 ^$ l6 `: _
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
