|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
" ?0 a$ o( Z. I
4 M& q3 v( @& r7 gaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.* K7 `5 `' {2 W6 p R ^; Q: @4 T. j
5 L, M+ K% _( q3 G; g2 B/ C# N
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
4 ]7 D4 z! C. `9 E5 Qand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
3 S% |, g& u, k$ b
% K X( H6 [; h0 G$ ?5 Z/ rso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
, c, S, @4 m/ L' J) Z7 H5 X/ R6 K: Y
A: M* S- _; sin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 4 a4 E; ?8 Z- B
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|