|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
& b7 e9 k$ J) R/ N
" V; v$ [+ x" L9 Daccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.- m k$ m6 m5 D" R7 \0 v
- U: O3 d1 E5 |" g4 X0 w8 Z( o
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
# P+ j$ }% d+ k* y' a; ~8 G |4 s3 N7 Hand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.2 S; e- X( T: v) F0 o
7 v/ c+ t3 e2 N
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
# k% z* [1 N! S% _; k+ P6 f" }5 f3 H, \; s9 s
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
. Z4 F- p- {# e3 Eat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
