|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
0 F" t8 m( U" s0 R, S1 o5 t( ?2 q! J+ F2 i
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! e' ]/ T7 b* z1 a7 g" Y8 \, C( T9 {3 t; o7 E
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,9 t# }, b* L( H( i- J b
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
0 \4 V6 B# g9 D- W* W J& f7 q. a1 S3 a/ l2 d2 X2 `! r6 `* r
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
; @! o$ i6 ]2 V
' q" l# k/ M) I6 j* k t9 ?in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, , C7 e! C: I9 Z6 b. |2 ^
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|