|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
' S; q; \/ P& ?9 ?/ G5 K! m1 a5 h* a4 m
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
% `$ B2 L5 k4 V" |" n0 K3 ^3 j; K1 X8 {7 W
$ q6 A" D7 n+ qIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
0 T6 J( M' {4 x# Y+ ^and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
H- F1 z$ G2 a: C; S
2 k& Q3 N) X0 Wso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險8 ] q, I0 Z' Y6 L
# [; w% j. S, N( T8 ^in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
! N. _! z$ R) [/ kat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|