|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.: w( k: |$ D8 k/ Q
3 p( U) c$ |0 ?5 m+ ?- U& ^+ gaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
0 z1 t7 b0 S! k, o S$ d9 U! g* t, \3 |: p1 ]* m
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
) ^0 S' x) Q N) }% Z# Mand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.% u# g0 E0 J% [6 A$ o
, t% b/ r$ e0 L0 Q L. S5 v
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險9 |$ U% k! L, w; G
/ b9 K, t6 p+ [4 u0 I
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
0 C4 c5 I) \" `0 n, N' T) Yat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|