 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
2 w+ Q5 S, L* y
; N9 n; [/ L7 Faccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
# y" P5 d z* f4 r7 |0 \' p" ^" g& I6 b5 x
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
& N( b3 p/ s( q0 Kand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.3 g% {3 r) S. C7 b" _
# V! u5 l1 G( m: t
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險3 S0 F6 D" G: ~: q7 F
+ L* E; ?, L, D! g8 ]5 W+ o* H7 D
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
" a8 b9 v1 V+ v2 K/ X) oat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|