|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.2 X) F+ K: i9 V; c3 ^# T/ D
! p% N: }+ I# u) g2 M- K
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.- c1 _" s6 n1 H' \" ?& z
3 ?7 X) N7 X3 R& }8 R. AIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
! a0 l0 m, [( N4 m" ]+ k' ~- Wand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.# d' {% O w1 ?2 s- p' ]; H6 M$ ?
/ o- _4 G* a) Q$ f' i0 vso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
* z) l3 w* {% ]( n9 I# L1 G+ K; Z4 a' L. ~5 ?3 G
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
. J. Z1 g# e( D; A( g4 V6 a4 B/ Cat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|