|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
; ~! v$ }! N9 M/ B# {! p7 [; _% |( [) Q# c: H& E& }3 c5 r
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.% n. r. @% W( V2 J8 h) V5 q* n. f4 n
# ?" Q8 Z2 _! |9 Y4 q E
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
+ I/ @% g, p; B/ x; N! T% a$ fand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
; n0 |0 D+ E% D- T. L" F, K. [# z4 a7 K. b
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險1 ?, _3 ?$ C/ f+ p6 q" |: e. K) E: M
) h, i" k! b) P- d' R
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, g2 [3 r4 S: g/ Q9 h; d/ e( N) [
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|