 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.0 N5 l% p1 z+ q* V0 [5 x
: X; C9 f4 ~- o$ iaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
5 a/ B! }4 C- ^5 s# D0 U% O
1 c5 }5 F" Y. a$ J/ M' w/ w) @In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,! {& F2 P; T& E- _8 y" @
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
! @% m4 Y' k+ s1 |& J
1 V' ]- _) _0 [9 _so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險' x, i0 i; t# c
) R) n9 a2 u [+ I* |& Q4 {
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
0 M9 O' Z/ l9 N$ E! q3 Wat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|