Rika

由最好排到最壞# U$ _1 m6 P: q" g( f4 n+ }+ W7 V! G
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong0 p! ?5 W0 h0 J! ?( D
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount( J, L6 Y# r8 ~' p/ [  S+ `
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her% t% }! k' \; `
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure0 b, f) F- q) B1 P
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) V$ i1 R5 e- N. s6 r* b7 p1 @, O/ p

- t* Y3 K6 K  Z/ GM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人, F! N* ~7 h5 R1 |( n- H* p4 U
: z! B8 _) f' Z, T0 a4 ^1 n
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)+ |% ^% d( j3 g: C0 g8 c" n, _
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!) q6 ], v6 x% @  y* k* m& F

+ \8 |6 w7 {+ p9 Z: U0 u! YB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做% y; M" D1 @( {

; s+ t3 \. J! `4 o" qL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
9 @, `4 n3 F+ R
' [( W- I! _+ BF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,3 i& z. U+ R6 z# R1 C
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 l9 S! B2 x: A. ~  _. |* M7 u/ i. Z* s8 t3 V" a2 }
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案, h: X) i! t: c6 _) S# c4 G
而家答多次
; p) k$ r; S# x, a; V: K3 Z% ?f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ L) ^0 I% e( a! V$ Z
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
7 s  G5 i2 o6 _7 H2 F6 Fb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
, y0 N- ~) X% E& Ds: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 f. @- _) y, {7 ~$ t
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S$ x! N- E; x, w' R7 H% ?

) e9 t, |$ \+ \L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大* V) P0 D+ H/ s; G, {
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度8 K! o+ D' R/ d/ e0 c6 i- M
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, y. c' v) _" ^' w4 [S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢# r9 s1 }& e+ f  L& L" Q& b$ B
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 i, t4 x, _, p6 ?F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"% r, A$ D( `- N2 y5 v
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
: }8 L8 w9 X5 S! D* |" D. h* |M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
! J: K* d1 Z0 m1 EL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果3 B0 I4 h) ]) D& x& s* v
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情" k$ l; Y0 `- Q9 }
0 D' ^. p) o  @- Y; }6 M( f5 _" t
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' i9 X. M8 {, Z! R$ TL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
/ j8 Z' h& w7 ^  G: W5 T) `$ |- }B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% @' x" X. L- ^! v6 w
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) ]  F# \4 X3 `1 H1 _# ?+ l' t
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- c- T: ~* H( n' y! @0 }, UM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 M! E% w" L: X' h; D9 a, e

( i- s: ]) p5 g same choices with u , but want to add some comments ! m4 q) q* M- q6 X$ A0 t

+ g- r0 N$ e. S# iB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 e: y2 m' H+ [' s
) C* t  o% E  x2 V) X( VS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )2 A- X3 I1 i& y- b3 j; Q& [2 |
: v5 y( O0 V7 n- [) K( }+ I& q
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: {: n3 W  {1 m( I- K- f5 w% p) O  X4 u3 E& M) x5 h5 `  E
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
* B! t  }; w& }; I0 }+ H5 V, G
! a7 o$ N$ d, R[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' s- U8 O0 `8 a5 F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ }2 H& W) e& [9 ?& vL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
2 f; c, C+ s# l* t) ~1 B- w$ s4 YF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma" M8 W# N* a0 O, o

( u7 f) K- m- o* y  c, Z2 k( s4 w最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
# J; M6 L+ T5 i* D7 o有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，1 E$ v) |4 z; [, e& [
由最好開始排起既話，2 [1 C6 J+ Y* e% e/ n
L B M F S 啦，
3 Z& t6 f$ m  I# a$ P/ k9 f1 @
% d9 [+ U0 ~8 V/ `) J其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
2 k9 k/ ?/ Y, h但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？0 P9 D' t6 g' n4 C; {' P
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
8 q8 {, W. z9 p- r5 K  e+ H又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
  I; p& P# w- Z8 c& S3 l0 w6 D$ v; i8 m
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 B- N( R0 {3 Q, ]2 r/ u4 @) s
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，7 L9 z  Q# e& @$ Q+ |; [9 p
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。7 B+ G. q# l3 n3 l* n8 ?

2 [- v5 X3 s" v+ T6 N$ ~1 p而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
" A5 [! F, l8 x M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
6 f. e5 C; G0 f$ T  U% y4 }2 Y3 L亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
. F6 H; P6 v6 Q4 t/ x, _; C知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
7 |" v+ I/ F5 W- r% p9 } M 都可算壞了。6 X& e# X: e1 W- k) X1 T

9 H7 B* W8 E+ b F 呢個人仲掂，; e1 p9 u. L0 u' T3 x( S6 Y7 S
知道既唔等於要講，0 r4 c, @+ J# R: g
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
( d( @2 @; |" l- F. |0 I. Z我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
$ A4 m/ r% d5 A2 t- {4 q% i8 |; `' b0 ^4 y; s" J/ D' h* X) P
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，  A0 v8 b9 G5 g3 L  Q7 w+ L
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。4 u7 J' u- h+ c* {+ U% U9 ^. p

" t' i1 l, I" s6 j9 A0 N* C/ k% [) m9 V; s+ Y2 [
6 l3 w+ h( N$ z5 j8 Y
題外話：/ f! @) n( A1 ?0 G' _# j! e7 H
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
' a2 b% a' h) H1 Q- `睇到 S 呢條友，
1 C8 e' k+ H( |8 o* b& s+ M我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L) x( `) Z" \! E; @9 O. m
4 ~) o3 F7 q6 o9 i1 L  D) _
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!3 m" X& y/ }2 b% Y4 ^6 o% W! Q  N4 o
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係. S6 s. j8 ?) a7 |
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
6 \; j; i# m4 L* `3 NB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. |7 M( \6 I7 l, a4 ^5 @) p; i; OL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...