Rika

由最好排到最壞
& Y" Y) N8 L1 L( w3 \* @' nF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# |, Q, W- X1 YB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ i* m- B& s( s' ]1 sS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her" F/ l9 r0 e; \" ]: Z
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
$ G8 X  ?) ~9 n+ x! @: f0 jL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% S: H2 l. I% |6 M7 i2 ]- E9 u; O6 }3 E2 g8 L. L
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
" R. z# R9 r( q5 W, h8 N. {7 i. e- ~+ w/ k+ V* l1 i8 M
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
2 p5 q7 w, c% n. G     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!8 `# Y0 f* d9 @! L# d) Y/ f
- Y$ a# O8 g, Y2 B8 ^
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
4 d0 M0 C: C* N7 H; b& O7 J5 p; i) M/ H9 \. o
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志5 q; g0 q1 U& h8 q! ~

; \8 _) H# V& f" @0 G; }F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
4 _) q* U: B4 ?! K  X. D5 M     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 j3 F! }$ C- i7 t4 I5 V/ t& |2 P. }1 F1 T- W% @4 h& l: p  E# X( x' t
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ {6 d$ F- {- x0 ?* g* C( a1 D
而家答多次. P: X6 y( U1 A6 z7 _2 z# r2 m/ n
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽* ^2 }4 @- h. w0 _  i/ d: J
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" V1 y! n4 T( V2 {8 R* h8 h& Cb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢& m4 s" w* _+ x7 }6 i0 @
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
) ]2 \" F+ H( o$ C% j+ P3 jm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 f9 H  R. X. R2 i
( P. W9 G# f, ~) _$ w7 p+ EL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
  U: h5 M1 k+ P9 k2 C% G3 ]F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ ?# B! D  _- k& {M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
. G  l. y% S/ Z; j9 \" ~S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
1 X" V! R" Z0 f  j0 V5 P% }B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
" m; g' N2 V: F0 q2 L- m1 RF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
( J6 f. W& j6 C# X3 Y( @$ iS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取8 f$ m) N& R3 E9 N6 h4 }+ C
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 k2 m( {2 A( E8 E
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果( D% O$ [& ]5 v. x' I' F
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
0 ]3 o7 a; O8 d/ E- M$ {, T9 m- h, b! i) x4 W* O7 J$ \
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
3 r3 J0 P5 D2 {' |# z7 NL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己* P; L9 X, k- b
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ a0 x: m' y; K) U
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件0 z, m6 Z- v. x, J, J, D
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! d" ]: J4 T2 M0 n0 J
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: T" M. d! `% `3 J8 ?

6 }. J) \7 k/ C same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 T  Y% x1 @/ X3 ]
* ?1 \+ y' A) E4 |
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ E: }- N& E8 B( _! d! m- }2 o! A# z& ~: |9 u: x6 o
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )9 P6 z6 n' b9 ^$ F7 `/ I
  w  _9 w& V1 j2 q0 a
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
  v3 H% T. R, p% h  `8 q/ P5 D
4 F0 K- A& \* J* xM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
3 f9 _0 _/ s  t8 e2 M( m. ?; K! x6 v" f+ ?6 s7 P' f& M- c
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ }! j; S% m  D' z4 n" D8 YM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢" Q, v8 J( U4 t. \# L2 x) r# X
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點9 d7 m  u5 {& r2 p% {4 y  ~( m
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
  X9 ~! R6 {4 ?/ H: S+ Z% ~* K; s! w7 m0 D4 T$ a# c9 O2 u9 {. H
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....7 K* y9 ^0 e+ `6 Q7 Y' f" O
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，+ k- t1 ^. I6 F. \4 l7 S" r
由最好開始排起既話，
; K4 A9 \) d. O* Z) bL B M F S 啦，
; L  t% T, F* D  ]& ^6 c$ Y6 }. E8 E. v8 i" s9 ]
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 c  g/ B( w' m9 y% V; f! s" _但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* k7 \7 h. w0 R  T
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- i( M# [* F8 Q9 `又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。4 B1 u. O5 |+ i1 ?. y# S
" {7 S, r9 @) S6 K
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，- f1 o' {/ m: h& f- ~; m$ b2 h
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，/ p1 m- I( D0 p! [- `2 M
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。2 K8 [; Y5 D/ N0 {! V# x
: W$ ^* a4 ^& r4 u: G# V. c) v
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，  f/ K) w  V" @1 ?; w' X& s
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，$ N4 V  g+ a# s  c6 M* k5 n% Y
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* L* X9 B3 S* @* F$ G/ {/ l9 y) |
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
+ Y4 f! S/ u; l/ ] M 都可算壞了。; h. Q7 X# G& U

$ w: w/ ]$ t% p/ H7 ] F 呢個人仲掂，
0 c8 M) D; D# m; L4 h知道既唔等於要講，
9 F  G* x6 ^( r  P1 j. I  [( C如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
% J) \' [! l- Z# ^% w5 |* x我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。( g; s' Y# E! B2 D# B
+ i; I+ g6 q' U+ \5 L6 i9 ?8 a
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
" o) Y* g( |4 O# \4 i( j始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。: p5 u( h- s0 h8 U

& S5 q# q4 |8 |6 _4 p) E( P9 T( ~' c, |+ [
# x1 P2 H; @5 O' p! q
題外話：1 X% J5 z$ {/ m6 ]2 h* Q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
* _3 h. G* Z. q- A4 B睇到 S 呢條友，
6 C' e) s, X/ ^- {: i我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 H; P% A3 Q7 _; O8 C8 w3 T

' n1 |$ a* z& S. iS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!1 a% [# F7 n% J$ ?" B- Y$ F
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
% t- P( [7 [% b8 KM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
$ h  x( P0 T3 }) t* q2 X+ Y' HB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害8 @6 @3 [  y% ?, g& Y- _- E: ]" S
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...