Rika

由最好排到最壞" A. ?& ^3 C+ u' n
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong- t/ L$ S/ N$ D9 k& N
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ X. {- W+ G7 C2 x8 |1 u$ z6 n" CS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& C: K# I0 V% H" F" w- W# ]' ^2 \
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
- H7 Q; Z: e& [L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
' k) @7 O2 ]; g" e) H% W- ~9 G- x, @# O+ I% ?$ `
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人, u- ?; `8 @+ n, [
6 i& ^1 ]% t" i- A
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
) A6 J9 S; d, z! n$ }+ ^/ D& M     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!. f. g+ E$ j* A  T% D

' V! p1 g$ L  {9 a0 v. LB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做5 ~3 a, n- i6 v  A& B6 [8 J

) m/ H+ p8 E+ r. j2 I6 EL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志# ^7 f! O4 Y3 F' X* [# R
, j; _4 ~$ @" f
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 W8 B0 d" z# G% ]9 H$ _     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
; S! ]- ~2 s+ T  H, T" W8 {8 u9 d( [5 X# ~
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案" K3 N: j  D# N6 D* s
而家答多次  p) O" R; E1 g0 ^" ^6 V
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 y0 a* H# M3 |# Cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架+ J! {( x/ l: |5 u1 N. z5 W3 L5 I! X& \
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
: B1 F0 [3 K/ G% M2 A, ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
9 L- D% `& V* O9 h  G+ }. I  Wm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
8 i4 C3 z9 Q; s
  {( `0 w- b8 N* i4 a/ Z7 JL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
4 k* t) v; o8 |F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 i& ^' r9 R  H: x5 u! R: c
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
0 E8 s9 Z. l; M. K" O. ]S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
2 W( b* R( I! b0 I6 d0 @B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. ]! V; n4 ^* D3 B) zF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- x/ l1 R, C6 \+ JS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取& o! b2 K! m: }6 G, W% F! X
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法: h7 }1 u1 w( d5 ?% W+ [1 Y
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果# d% s- z5 ?- v9 A
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
- e! P: r! j; E, S
1 r; n2 z/ V( m世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:6 X0 u/ t9 f: g& M) g5 p$ J! H
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己$ Q- K+ i* ^8 E0 g+ u. {
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
* ^' R, j3 I7 e3 T8 k/ ~1 \! cS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
3 x4 R' c" S# _" AF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
& x5 @$ J1 r, E* {, U$ dM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ R4 d. N2 _2 B1 c1 _7 u/ E6 r0 w# t* J- u  j, C
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
- u6 G; B& @  ~! O& e* k
  i7 ~; C# |4 A2 T% t1 i/ pB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& o9 l5 q7 \% N6 H
; j) B9 E4 Y& @: |# XS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
( |. r/ h& y5 a1 v/ G+ z3 Q+ V# P
8 L' p- l$ V7 u9 K* t7 }# ?5 iF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
8 e8 _. W& `9 S! p$ P
# Z% a  y) s- ^) h+ mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......3 |* j  m& y2 g, T( S, w

+ h: T3 a8 b/ ^* Y' h' Z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge" ^+ E: M: t6 J+ e2 n7 H3 ?2 p" O
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' V$ C- G6 R5 [: wL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點' k) w: f! f! C) K; m' J7 E
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& S3 v! L8 S/ x& ~" K

, K; `/ ?. w# S! j2 V4 o$ h  D最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 w2 H5 M' o/ U& i有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
6 h* w# w7 K# U( z) ~由最好開始排起既話，2 Q* {, S, R) v- U! R4 X2 z" L
L B M F S 啦，
: f( R/ @6 s* e: r
/ K( |& t; E; O, C  q  G1 u其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 C+ ]* n- l  B2 K
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？% }8 ^& {0 e: r# d* b; q, v# f
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. u, u! ]; q# z$ B- o2 D又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。) [0 b: ?0 v. ~( f5 T: p

# H! Z9 N" t. [而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，7 `# T5 T2 e- R0 ]8 k
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 r! P6 V" U( T/ m. \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。# k7 D4 a: B# ?# b4 w+ J- E

5 r" V" ?/ i3 h( O/ c" M2 D0 W" C而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
# s" Z7 ?4 r; H M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，0 _) c  R# r, O8 X( V6 V
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* a/ x0 I9 }+ D7 }9 g! ^4 s$ m
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，' ~0 }" o% v- \. e9 T' h$ `
M 都可算壞了。
' {: y0 ~  s8 w
. |" q8 x# C; {0 C F 呢個人仲掂，
( X* x% J: C* r知道既唔等於要講，, P5 i4 Y( h$ \; Q9 p# q
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，4 J' Z" i! k6 j* o' \# V- O
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 y( p& a* c. [' }7 G5 k, q$ w: u# _& [  ]/ F9 D7 b
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
9 u* z9 I, p. s# o1 B& Y  I始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
, F2 E4 d6 X  t+ R: {* k
" o! M0 P6 Z8 \
$ L4 N& K7 e, w5 y: Z4 }5 X! e
+ \* e! B3 H! e6 @題外話：
! E5 ]% A( S5 E1 p- D* \: x. B唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- H! I. `$ `3 Z( z
睇到 S 呢條友，* t, t$ h1 k! d7 W, p7 s( K$ d
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; w+ u8 M* D) P9 V, G/ T( I; c

3 o7 u8 _# A9 i7 G  }3 oS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
, E  }+ k' X; M. d$ n6 u$ O# t- lF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
- J) `+ x1 @& ?$ D0 o) mM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 u2 U4 y8 a1 U7 RB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
2 D) P: j- p- ~% y$ M8 @L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...