Rika

由最好排到最壞
  L, T9 `, R) t% _: U8 q, mF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong' J0 a6 J2 d# e! X% o) c1 x
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
' d( Z/ g; k: V$ W5 [# q( D' rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
6 }4 b% H0 ^' E/ X# H- l" C; y) h$ fM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
' l( T3 f2 q- V3 FL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) ]2 _9 u: h7 P5 T* h

: ?1 [0 S  R0 S9 LM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
  d5 A7 w# f5 y3 u
" G' p! O5 v( AS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)  R4 ]- [) R% [1 i/ J7 a& r2 D3 G1 y
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
( ]# S' s: i2 e. P6 g6 D* b. q' T- k" s
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做5 C: C7 D; G) E# ?. T: \
& h2 ]* ]- N# F% P% r
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志( k" c5 [  e8 \! |

/ V/ w. J- l) D& V8 ^/ A2 _F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,+ x- V9 D# u! m" G  |" j
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好1 C8 ]7 L" n! V* O8 Y* \  Q. y4 d

  ]! J2 N& S: F5 \2 l6 Z[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, Q4 ]" M- x& E0 r8 e! W而家答多次! ^1 r1 Y: r0 ~  W, P8 U' E
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ C: @4 z! B" z* K' e
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架2 d1 ^' {* C7 U
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
: M$ o- z+ w/ rs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! g/ |" E0 f! }/ \5 p
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
& U' X* c1 G( M4 l. e$ ?# A6 o2 Z" g; [+ l
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
+ ?0 L1 a; ^7 B" U* V3 S: Z7 ?" z1 QF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度" p' j3 D8 y  |
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒6 W. W' L4 L$ S- t
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
3 h, v& i4 R" t6 }4 i3 S7 F. {1 [# LB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞. G+ a* y7 I2 M# z& y- @( {$ w
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
3 q( K3 j5 c/ B! JS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
/ i/ w: \1 K: Z9 V8 y- sM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
  x4 k+ f3 e1 dL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
9 Q! j' W% U0 h* E5 t1 I$ [4 H  JB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! q+ ?  G7 h- b, p4 g# y

  n3 y( G4 m$ _世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
% ?  a3 y5 i$ v( SL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
, U! v" M, R" ]$ \- aB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
; l5 o/ e8 i1 ~8 E, f0 x' z% tS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
+ q. E- q# O( JF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方% D  t$ g; J' x5 b: o
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 @. O% V7 O2 U0 H  F
1 d% Q& K$ E$ P4 w4 w same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( D4 P6 w8 W5 l: g+ V- Y- G9 D! U: `( e; p5 d; Y" j1 K3 N! k
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& H6 H8 L' Z3 v
5 q  G' V1 T7 Y* `$ NS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )% I4 _8 W5 M9 G9 Q4 W( q1 ?9 N  o
9 N  t3 U1 ~  V& O( z$ ]+ y
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / y( D0 h/ Q  u+ w/ i
+ j) J# U7 {2 z) V, F% Q9 i
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
( j7 s& C$ S6 B  z2 E, c3 `
& V9 ]4 F; R  W: _[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; z0 a& l5 \; V7 W
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
9 C, ~2 p; T7 LL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; {' Y2 M5 Y3 A' t8 Y: O. U% U
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
1 N. m% e  [1 }8 t* h6 @: G- b* r
$ I4 E0 Z  ?( @& U最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- {$ D9 Z  D# ]/ q) E6 l* C
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，" u; h+ z5 P0 K
由最好開始排起既話，5 g) |0 z) m4 q; X' X. y
L B M F S 啦，
6 b2 Q  Q4 I8 V/ C* a4 o2 w
0 c" ]9 {9 i/ f* g6 X4 S( W其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 P' `/ x# D; f但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？) N4 A. T% u" L/ G& c% b
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？- I+ I7 t6 h) _5 t* a" s0 O
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
- V, l; m* y& ~1 S  n* D& m3 h7 m+ U0 M
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
5 f3 r* I( K4 V8 L- ^所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 L" e' K- l: L
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
1 D6 @+ T- u6 F% o% _& k5 R9 e3 ]6 }- L
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
- @7 w; h: B' f M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，' f. v  B: i2 F) d
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，( J0 u2 P0 {1 [, r! k
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
0 @( v$ j' x" p; h M 都可算壞了。
9 q  x4 ?7 }6 v0 f
& y' W. E6 h" G; q& v F 呢個人仲掂，: N: c6 m! l( h; V9 a5 i
知道既唔等於要講，
5 @' K! j& O# _, U如果呢件事發生係自己身上，; d$ m' G$ C& r! y4 k
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。5 K  T* Y- @0 Z! p1 L' f7 `- A

3 I2 J7 i; ~2 }最衰個個緊係 S 啦，* \: |! w/ }5 B+ P
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
/ Q& h  L# h% q: P' @& e% r4 h# z; X+ ^5 t0 p& ^8 N- U
, G; z" s: @" S+ b+ n: V/ Q5 \* i

& F; N4 n1 ~  Y7 d+ Z2 E1 Y題外話：
9 K- V" `! N; n* g: {- z唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
# [' `9 ~& a! e3 [* r' `. i- I0 E% F8 ?) F睇到 S 呢條友，
6 u- G6 _% a/ M+ z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
8 P; J2 o7 x# M7 I! O3 H: P5 [3 x: s/ X
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!& n; }# ?& I/ T) i( n; {+ K) `( Z5 h
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係* ^  A$ @" M9 ^! e
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
8 Z1 b- R' t. C7 F; }+ L+ q# EB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害3 u- n; W  i& o3 T/ c$ K, J) J! @
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...