Rika

由最好排到最壞
7 @9 \% K! _9 ^- P2 d9 R- L- e9 MF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong% Z4 w6 }4 H/ l3 q0 B. K
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 w) s5 N3 X6 |  U1 M
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her" W- {: |  M5 j' c* p
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure9 W& c$ g* K" u  u" ?/ G
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
& x8 |7 m% i9 j1 s/ l
$ W& I! E" a2 I& g# W7 }  b1 l# ~& q; ]M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人# J& d6 ~: @  h
0 Q9 ]3 a+ w; v9 _/ Y/ S& k
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)! z7 E' D) r" q1 n9 u' e0 e
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!: v( @: b& x4 s  M* Y" |0 [
* X/ O+ |/ U. O7 A+ U( i# T
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- X" }  }& d% S9 m" f; S3 C- U- n

- l6 Q. B7 F; J+ nL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
, k3 K- i6 Q, j, P- f0 }0 Q' o# z9 C: F, h
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
$ `$ w/ w! m2 _/ \$ t4 L- J     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好6 n: b! }& R1 C/ P$ p% \8 @

* @! n; u# s* r8 A; m8 V[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 V+ w* m: y% [/ o$ s+ V而家答多次
( L5 _8 E: h" b5 m7 _f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ r' {  Q) O! O/ g( L7 x
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架# ?, x0 m# X! X; }% b8 S4 m
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
2 l+ B: P; q0 b9 f9 L( As: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! V7 l) }' C1 u/ a% c3 H" J+ u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S7 K" {) H$ s6 w" k% f3 ^/ D5 R3 l

- ]8 W- G) F, y5 I$ `L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
' n- S7 r6 h6 B* W% M, |F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度7 z1 }8 S2 O. I9 t
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ z) y& l- {3 ?8 C1 E* S8 ~
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
" E+ q  T) d0 l2 W4 e/ O% V1 w0 s6 zB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 [) F4 \" [/ @" e
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. n+ a& x* w4 YS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 C' a- |% ?( B8 {9 V8 U
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法4 t/ ]' m* r& e3 A- c* w, z5 t/ m
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 P( v0 {' `# zB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情9 e* Y5 ]7 `) {% a
' J6 @9 C% Q" s- \- N: t0 E( W0 }
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
6 x  d; b6 P( l7 j$ O# j1 c* _; bL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* v9 z$ D9 |* j$ l  n" u/ U8 F. BB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘5 f8 `* D# n$ x4 ~! W2 M2 \
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件+ M) }( a4 S5 f" r) L3 V
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方7 y+ c3 [# v$ M. m# o3 `
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ z- S7 }7 o$ b: ~: N5 }

& E( ]' \4 w! t7 F1 p" K- Q8 ?: a same choices with u , but want to add some comments ) \# y* A& w+ i& N, t5 ?# V2 N

6 o7 z' [. |( g+ ~# t0 y* M: HB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ( w* g# x! c/ i6 Z4 o
  ^  J7 Z- @( ~' e2 D, t% h: Z
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
4 o- ~( V) v( v1 P1 h# S. i
* S' S9 Z8 U6 I' [' CF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / V# X: g. L& c* @- n
- _" Y  E2 u9 o: v) }
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  ^9 ^1 T$ b+ F: c2 r, ]9 q
  I  A7 T9 [4 t2 h1 L) T; Q) G
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge$ ]+ J: m6 P* a
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
9 W8 M$ A0 q- ~9 PL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
' _4 k) I) a+ o; D  DF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma" a3 s' i% M/ G2 d
8 e4 I9 m' R9 |; X
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
- {1 t' y5 `6 [; |4 X有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，6 z) y9 I$ n. z
由最好開始排起既話，& Q; S- _! a, [
L B M F S 啦，0 f. u8 y& h! Z! N& t$ y# W

: n" U4 s' }) [/ b* d* }" E( L# }其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，! j) ]5 l- O$ W  g4 ~; d" b* Z
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* x$ j8 B, d) }1 F6 ^7 H/ w7 V
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
* P5 E) a: U: E% ]. }; o: `: U又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。6 m7 s2 w& v+ `
% r! t; g8 ^( t# t
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
" O' z! Z3 N0 {- Z+ R% L# f) L+ t2 r所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，# b9 J4 Z4 C& n. {1 g( z
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ ~% `# H# ]7 N' C
# B* Y$ e/ R& L, y/ p
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
1 n& e4 x+ {' q M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 J6 `/ H( [  y: ^亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 N# y! Z' e* c) Q! w! W4 t0 _2 b知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，. I3 c# K0 U. u9 ~% l) w
M 都可算壞了。$ a: J& c8 S: |4 i+ `

: z  x2 O- w' H6 x6 p F 呢個人仲掂，
1 y  T& C% S2 i! K0 q) d/ F知道既唔等於要講，
, E+ D, m- j& |- F* x如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 i' V8 O* O4 d  Y  D我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。& W1 S- L6 T0 M2 E4 u9 [6 N

( ]6 i) o3 g6 F4 B8 p' u8 M最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( f5 M( Q5 y5 y始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
* Y& `- ?: e# M0 l7 v: y% j) m0 E% ?7 j9 R; p5 j6 K

# g6 ~: a2 w$ Q8 N
) V6 H! L; q& f* l6 H& u" m( K題外話：  c; [1 s0 D  z. b
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，3 B0 q* n& l- [% X
睇到 S 呢條友，
0 ?5 C; H9 `* u' b3 O& n& F我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
' @! B5 r* e+ T9 J0 \8 R
  E6 G3 G. {+ P, G6 J' ES: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
) O' V! n! D6 z7 O" WF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
# Q/ d0 Y2 U+ h! @! ^% M; uM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
" g0 [! U" d  I9 IB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
* o+ ^( g5 v" f4 ^8 O4 Z7 }L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...