Rika

由最好排到最壞# D, N% C: [4 b8 H; b
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
- D1 p' N, K( ?/ H! s9 R& KB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount! G7 Z& n& |; r' ^7 S# `! T
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ I: Z* h5 b! t
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure3 H3 u0 d$ r0 K
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
( D, s. C2 ^; z. I
5 l6 G# ~; ]' `9 z8 v# V" \M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
3 N0 W7 I, ^; {: _/ z) [/ [( A/ z+ n& g; ?4 J
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事); [) j1 G# K) Y4 J: ]( n
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!$ E: R  E1 M2 @( s
) \  Y: e6 D5 T+ K' F% N, M& z/ _
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
4 r. I. v9 \2 k& Q
) r7 l) Q9 G/ E& U1 J' mL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志1 O  f1 A. [5 u) M5 b) }, D8 q

/ h9 l' }$ a2 |F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
, ~% h- A" T4 ?3 D     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
* A7 ~  `7 n3 e2 f1 x. v: ^9 Q7 z& F( S, s2 E. ]# \* ]1 T2 V; g. W, c
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 E( g6 e4 }( Z& n5 L, J; `: V" U
而家答多次8 W3 U! F4 Z% x( O
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( o  T& }7 N& e# P5 C- N3 b
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架8 p1 m  Y+ Z$ U. w. L
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢' u( z. k  H  A% Y$ @
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
; t* d, Z& G0 km: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S# D* _: ~7 p! _2 g3 m0 Q$ x

1 L1 _  d- z( tL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大0 d) ?1 @; c2 ?+ q# G0 t. h1 u# N
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度0 G1 b6 ?; ]- ?  |9 a( E, }/ a
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ o9 ?3 J# b5 d" q
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. @+ m* f/ e' r5 n$ B0 [
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞+ B4 Q4 e& `8 T4 V1 z' s
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
" r9 ^5 l* B7 H* vS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
  Z$ a: u' h4 }3 g9 X- NM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
) H- ^* p0 L. {( y2 ^( sL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( }7 l( Y& X' Q1 q! b, uB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ y' p0 w% D  M) g" R3 i
! L0 x% k& ]4 Q$ P
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
7 A8 ?7 T& `) m1 g) @L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
0 ]4 \# ?" W( T! V0 wB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% I3 j7 W9 d1 l! ^
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: S# O) c1 @2 \7 E- p9 ]F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方8 O* K1 _4 @. t4 m) J: z1 {
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 W2 a# b' R7 K/ L* y" v0 P

( ?. v' i2 Q5 W) }  z% n2 A2 @ same choices with u , but want to add some comments ! y6 a8 f: U* \( z- O% f' f  I& F

7 v; R6 {. o) a/ o5 B  H/ u3 FB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * }, B+ R$ o/ Y3 X
( m. ^/ q3 U. l( g: H, w9 H$ q/ Z
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )8 e* e4 z/ G/ S& Y

2 H8 p- ]2 E* G* O" A, i# s* LF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 J9 J  T. c) p0 I

3 [5 _: ]. Z) w( y) X: u2 ?) y% m5 qM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....... v3 g0 k( j, Z/ ]. x& Q# L

$ k; C$ m0 h$ N( h[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 p" x; m8 A0 e8 J' J2 n
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢* B+ o$ `/ A' o% M
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
) \! s: a' A1 rF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 k* E8 U) \$ i! ^2 p% }" o2 [3 Y- [5 Z6 ?! |
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
) h4 b0 H) w: u. a% |( n* B& e9 b有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，0 {$ b- L. n+ S2 N
由最好開始排起既話，" c. v/ `# {$ c; e5 V
L B M F S 啦，
3 _0 A7 R' ~3 |( E6 r) |  a& b, q7 s. \( e, f3 m  y
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" b& V" f" u3 T  w+ d
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？$ R. c5 D; y& x/ o4 R5 D( N
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- `* H$ q, C5 k8 P% U5 \又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
% }  \# P7 ]7 r5 O5 c5 g
) n' ?6 |: p. R而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 M; q5 {8 {* @/ F. L
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
4 @. t, d# G3 _: `, c* d* D明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
8 h1 Y* y3 ]. ]$ D% M+ `# j4 ?8 X: V0 n4 D! p
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，" _% i! M/ K4 D) ]
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，# T& Z/ V2 Q3 {- t- [/ e% M
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，9 d+ B* e( P$ E; K* g0 M
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，1 [+ n3 }& C- B
M 都可算壞了。4 p* Q2 G- K/ x" X  L3 I. A

! D* f3 H7 \$ u F 呢個人仲掂，
' f8 _1 k1 i! S# x. f4 n知道既唔等於要講，4 e& c7 G  T: T( Y0 p
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
% ]- P# J' O1 W6 G我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。7 h- Q6 Q) M/ O- F& v" y

2 n% S: a9 z  z7 g' F最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
1 L. m! r  E& I  Z9 o始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ P7 W# H; t, C2 y% K' [. F5 Z$ ~8 R4 ^8 c: z4 G1 l. c* g
* `6 f7 P! E9 Q
1 s9 _. J% _% C( d, t; {/ r
題外話：
( v2 [( e( c' O; q! {唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
$ F, W$ q- L- T" E: v( M睇到 S 呢條友，6 y) a; B7 v" g9 r6 u9 o( ?
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, ]1 c& i: p# j5 _
. `- Y2 i, N, S# FS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
& q6 {) b4 q1 w- BF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
& {. _3 e3 Q8 c# Y* U1 WM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她! R% R6 ]6 z8 Q9 R6 u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害0 G* b* {8 a) W
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...