Rika

由最好排到最壞
3 v$ J( D7 U: I9 FF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong  X1 ^/ Z1 ~5 b! ?
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ q7 X! e( b, a: y/ hS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
9 f8 G' O# e$ gM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure# g. j1 H% g: C+ a, t* e# ~  k
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:- t' |3 H) b3 W" p

. U/ Z7 ~- c' m# q6 s7 EM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人' P8 l, e: ]: [/ B& J: Y

$ O8 C9 @1 E# }S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)! i# [- q! O$ m
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!" o7 o8 P6 t' J$ d3 F# R

( j, N; `5 w# K1 ^. o' jB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做0 r9 l$ y( G  d1 S8 R
( l: P8 ^; ^* B" `. ]6 S+ |. C
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
3 O, W: j4 ~2 b" B$ P9 F7 U3 W3 |1 c; P/ N" g
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,: {- m1 F8 y7 Z" C
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 X0 \# J; R  c& W/ S. a
) n' W3 R, \8 u9 W1 k8 I[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
) Q/ B% n3 P+ n$ J2 @0 S: J. \而家答多次
% o  [: R, i# G) v. jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
( u5 L2 z% Z0 J6 L! j3 ?l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架* r3 T3 v: ^* J9 y  c4 H
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
* G, o) g% ^; C* H/ _s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 p( M+ D. n7 I* o- e; U+ u; Z, em: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
$ p7 A" u$ c, Q# B- R& l. H0 X5 o
$ a' O% ^5 ]7 V5 I0 i. _+ h; hL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) j& V' {3 Y$ `  X4 D: \) m; D7 d  i( v' EF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度2 E  C; A- w2 j* O
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
/ r. D. c* Y2 ?5 ?% }1 M$ k* |# q) TS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢& v( `8 ?1 w; d+ E- j& M
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞7 |/ u* W$ `+ j6 p9 x: k* P+ h
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
" c7 x) o4 I' B2 d* s* g! b+ q8 m) {! xS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
! a5 \, I8 N8 rM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法5 W7 |( ?$ l+ i" Q* Z; ?4 @
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ j6 O( D) V* _. k' ]1 ?B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
: j- z- m( W  g* h+ g1 o, i  b
; q5 n9 _( F3 d. ?2 H4 I世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 P+ @& s* t* Y) d# T0 @. v
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" \1 [2 ]# I9 A
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
9 J% [5 {$ s7 |/ dS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
% i" P; x- |5 k4 V, _+ ]. SF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
: x$ Y3 L& a- H0 XM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: f9 I6 O& C& R  A% x. N4 B
. H* _% \* N) R$ \
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 `  F* E* u9 s8 [& I1 K

# \9 X7 t$ x% j8 x, S+ m: xB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  # W% _  g' ?. y- ^, _

9 s: M0 g( O. A5 h. J& US : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# b. s& O% t. ^% v. |+ I" G1 \
( Y0 e2 N6 l6 y; [& N3 ZF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
) \( b6 C' j$ ?5 M# ^7 A6 A+ `7 j8 j7 J6 O3 a  D# F
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
3 |( @5 G1 r0 R5 N5 L7 d0 D6 r. y! b0 v( n* K9 |8 ?& N
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% F, ^! k9 A. Q; X* |
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
, F* U9 r2 ~5 _L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點) B1 k- R3 B: m" O! a
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
' O$ c& _  l7 L# E9 I: f6 f: Y8 n4 O, S7 P* Q
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 D8 a, U  f& J$ k1 b: S3 e有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
2 x) x0 U- P5 ~8 h( S# I由最好開始排起既話，$ P) b$ q2 e* ?& ?9 S
L B M F S 啦，
' c  |. T9 Q6 E" B2 ?* b
/ s+ _; i" K  D- Z. B其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
; J3 w% W0 V6 N9 R- [/ D* U! [+ a但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
! O! y1 a0 X/ n' c. c4 h- ^$ g如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- ^' p; g; X6 A; T1 z又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: C" B! A, e9 E5 x3 C1 g4 ?
9 w% d1 s8 [6 Z1 C0 {5 a; ~6 ?
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，, Z# Y2 U: s5 ]! z; v" y
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 ?+ Z& E9 V$ ~7 g$ U
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。7 q0 S( N7 k' [2 f

: u( R8 m- `% p' g9 |6 T+ f而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
/ Z1 J% M9 F  v! H: s. F! Y  x9 u M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
' T1 f! }, V2 V3 r亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
  t2 N) b1 m5 V! [知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: x  r( u1 |* T/ g
M 都可算壞了。, `5 q" u  m/ E

8 I# V8 N$ ~/ J1 C" v1 e F 呢個人仲掂，! `* ^! A2 V2 f' w# j7 ~
知道既唔等於要講，2 P/ r. N5 o8 a' X4 a  @
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，6 P5 Y8 x, Y: }7 ^& N7 ~/ j, V5 ~
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
$ c3 h; b) U) c4 r% K- D, N- c1 D% U# t, Z5 v: Z/ u
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' B* |$ Q  H( y5 b! M1 r# J
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
! R: O) r( i6 Y3 A
: `3 J- C7 [+ \  c' A+ N
3 y9 k' y- J$ D/ I0 ?0 x) d' u1 G) B& I" f- [
題外話：: g& ~1 A4 S$ D. H
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
' ]5 [0 f7 {5 p* G- D' O睇到 S 呢條友，, {, D! Z: X! x& M6 x8 O
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
9 c. O; j8 u* B& I& o& r8 b8 G& I% g; \; ~; K0 L
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% k5 m2 |4 |& P6 T; T( c6 `( \7 ^/ x* _( b
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
. A* i9 D4 {$ ^! O; XM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她9 L9 ^: d) s' @
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害& P3 e4 n7 L1 r+ t7 L: T5 f2 I
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...