Rika

由最好排到最壞, q( H5 v) t: ~+ g# b
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong5 L3 L+ H; q$ z
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
( U9 d% b7 x7 Q$ u7 kS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ R2 \" Z. t% P7 A7 H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure8 h; w, q6 F+ s6 J/ z- u
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! N- m$ T( H6 N" ^, B9 X9 y. j) f( ^
' n' Q+ n2 w; d* X' R" s5 t1 SM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
! h% D3 ^: a* C$ Q  n! b5 v
" z% s/ B2 D  D  qS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)5 S4 n4 ~5 R- i. V! L
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
# a' ?- u0 z5 y/ |% a( w7 y  M- T9 C$ f# D7 d; G! X) a- |
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
7 T) K# f7 D6 y# B" c4 g9 h3 y4 J
' ~8 B; v& h; u  jL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* n! J6 V( J3 H: C
# G9 K5 ^( |* P) Y4 E) w
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; u  |4 ~" B/ P: t& N     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
5 |! K( b& e0 D. x" X5 o1 V) W" O; ~4 I1 K: |
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案, D' b3 b' q7 D2 j
而家答多次
- z2 r! Q0 a) P" K0 v( J$ d' O4 lf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ H7 d" k: x( n6 t8 H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
# X  ?* p8 M* a, ?% Lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢$ L: |0 o# U+ L8 w
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 U9 v6 V2 C5 k/ E" ]6 I. dm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# y- h" G4 V- L- ~
9 \- N9 k6 [- ]3 d2 F' o! OL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大7 F3 @; F+ M0 s, S+ m; Y- B! n
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
8 p4 r- V% L. M1 T& WM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒6 P' D7 T9 j. _
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢! |6 k- O0 c- O, r
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; ]. D1 m9 N: ]% i5 yF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"4 \/ ^! }# J5 M# j8 e# W: ^
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取# u. I4 i, r1 K- l$ i
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法: F/ ^2 ]# ?0 J% i& Q8 {5 O* K! m
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
2 f. ^; n7 f" `7 T4 k5 y- e! lB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情4 K" g6 n2 r* {$ w$ s; D
; h2 K2 _5 V+ W& R) ?
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:, C' g" ^! s( ]5 W, w, N
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
5 w) l7 m6 m! _9 ^B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% K7 l6 E( Z: r
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件+ Z" U5 ]1 I: Z4 x
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方# E" ]1 T5 U$ _$ v9 l9 E- L
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 J# _8 q; l; {: l- \) n4 A9 \0 B6 N
* V2 R- J! {  a3 ~9 U same choices with u , but want to add some comments . a$ v: c1 X- X6 g  G2 u4 q: E
% `( z7 {* b2 {
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 b- I4 ?+ P* K* b

' a$ d, J1 c  GS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
9 p2 B$ h, f+ b1 o
& G: K4 l" _2 G5 l/ d8 _  qF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
. [) \" w5 C, @5 g& d) _6 J/ w
8 O) b1 A8 ?. @, F( [! U2 [M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......7 |3 \8 d; `* L* r' w
$ X1 F, t- M& v0 S
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge! ?+ Y5 _# |1 j8 j& X: o' }8 O, _
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 q! O; j" i- J$ O0 l: r" mL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點- J( ]* H7 N6 S4 ]! A
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
  S) X3 ~3 W5 C# P: A
3 ]  R/ T1 R; g# G+ q, b/ z- W最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 H  w% ]3 V/ v: b有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
) w- h( [( J+ }' d  Z4 L: j8 ^由最好開始排起既話，, S% O! _( g) M8 O3 \, V* a
L B M F S 啦，
$ Y6 ^5 Y/ o: K2 ?" m$ r/ z
5 Y- S+ }2 b1 N, G) S6 u9 n4 g# E其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 s3 }# [( \  T1 {
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 M! m6 D4 [( m& S/ M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？8 C1 K8 j" e. t0 C
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。4 C/ [# Z/ G. ~# q1 l1 Q  f

, o" l" z$ V% z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ J2 _/ K: b- B5 p
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，4 d! Y3 U* O* g# B4 g, B
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。0 s1 u+ Q  y; ~  w

( t. \8 J' c& Q% n而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
* I  B5 w( q" k2 V3 N M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，; ^! s" g4 x! i, j# q
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! @. y3 g! i- U  {) a知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) B0 T* a- N7 T2 x% C. r# p  E
M 都可算壞了。0 \7 V" V% ~% `

- H) {& y- f7 P- T( m F 呢個人仲掂，  ^# r2 |% w  D# \$ g8 N' ~) w+ W
知道既唔等於要講，& G# U4 K8 ?2 T' `* y0 B
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. G  H' @2 G$ Q) x4 q; B* H' P9 d我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。% G4 Q# N$ H7 X; C: u  v
7 t* m( t, `1 v! F% j6 \
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，1 Y6 c( b$ H1 o$ _, D# i- S8 i# {
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; _; c- G. k$ d  ]

$ H- o6 t4 v7 @, ]! d& i! A% m2 c1 ~3 U7 p4 l6 r

* k" f1 D5 P+ Y! O6 u7 r題外話：
3 r& ^1 }5 Z' C$ h9 C唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，2 O" j; q( m, c
睇到 S 呢條友，
1 W$ Q8 z2 E: q0 O9 n我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 i; n. l! |/ E5 ^

3 l+ w) e/ \# n7 ]8 |# @- nS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. u) R7 p; B7 p% }
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
: Q/ I" D' y  v) m0 E& I7 PM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
, ^* r* Q3 u: G: hB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. V0 j* @! N9 V; Q5 H0 S
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...