Rika

由最好排到最壞1 g* h& n+ a. G) _1 ?, @
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong6 k  o6 h* K: I
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 t( `. J& c( Z( ~" G( n
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her. i3 w/ ^; x' ]4 _; W8 c$ S* w
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
2 U, c& b# `3 _, B) ^4 Z3 OL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:9 ]8 v  j0 I, y( i2 g5 k- ^  j/ D" K
8 P' y3 ^: ?1 m' q" J4 M
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- O' y7 M' B* Y1 J% A2 l9 N
$ ]- A: ^$ \1 l& `' @; A6 qS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
' A* }; H& t9 f4 ]3 R& p     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!3 ^" M: e3 i! [' t: g& q1 s

- D& r- A- y; E4 V# F% k$ p1 ]- m" f' I* `B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做7 i6 j' ^3 e3 ~

- E$ w" |9 }1 T/ dL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
6 j' D  `) T1 w, A. F) Z
- q$ q  g: a, |. \F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# m/ n1 B% j) l& H     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  m6 J& j2 g0 j  H" q. G! y3 t. Q, p. X- |7 \  x8 r
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, D& i. X2 p  S% x而家答多次/ X' `5 i0 \  L
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 Y6 e/ @; I; y- a- n' N7 t' P/ wl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架. `& R9 c* _, l
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, a* k7 q1 K) p
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.3 ~0 i4 M( q" U
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( G% b! l  k  X9 E

6 ?% S( B! v; C7 |1 B; h) E  M# bL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
5 t( ]( [  v5 S+ J1 I, WF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
) h" [$ P' a' i7 G+ YM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, y7 ^7 c5 M$ r. M5 @! m% [S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  H1 Q8 S1 U9 M* w4 A. U
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
- j/ q+ G. d9 ?! @9 X; e6 g, F* y9 jF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
, I* d+ L" D" c1 C( oS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% J" q$ \) b) g( _" b* IM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# J: w6 {0 c4 i4 C. ^5 E
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果5 u% b1 g4 m0 d+ y
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
6 `2 Q: k7 _* J
' i  n. h; `! E& a1 J4 A/ f2 b世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
& u7 N# K/ t1 H. Z4 q5 S: gL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
% I+ C/ o: p: o4 f. n7 @$ w% FB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘7 f6 @( M. ]" L/ ]
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件$ o3 u' v: L5 B  W5 @5 @
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
0 |5 s& j* z( @4 g2 ]  q3 lM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* x6 b3 ~$ b! U5 R

8 p, z. J9 f+ c3 t3 L same choices with u , but want to add some comments : t1 W3 a( k( a, K7 w
2 O) {  k8 }: R8 y
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  # B! s. m7 b: F4 \2 I# L

" O0 b) m  o" w# F) _/ xS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )# y- J! Z. W7 q7 X* O; s
' Q. w5 n. G  m1 l, S0 R: ~
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 2 a, A6 ~$ r' \6 ~) l+ S& s
9 G4 |1 F8 T6 Z% X/ v2 s
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
- {3 b5 U0 G& j) q( R0 z) i5 Z
7 V2 P/ l. I' b; d# A% ][ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
7 _, b3 r! }5 E/ C& ^; KM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 @2 ^: K, X" U' XL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
* S" i1 K1 J  S# X+ {F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: b+ ]: L2 ^3 i7 G& M2 A) [3 A8 i

8 I' I* \& |6 d2 \& B  }最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....6 J) }% z; \. p3 P
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，, S$ B7 Z7 f5 a! f5 B4 \
由最好開始排起既話，, o) x; U6 \1 E* b. x
L B M F S 啦，3 m  y, P- q  B4 Q# M
0 Q% d0 e0 @' a' X
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，; ]: n- N9 p0 z# H6 K7 t
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 f3 p. }" h. B$ p; @
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 N/ K+ p) i; G# }; O2 i9 H: B
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ K" ]+ p/ N" E$ Y+ b$ R1 H# ]2 }

! z, f# U4 G" r5 t而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) e* R- \: {! a' [0 e, F
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
2 F0 P4 z& M) j9 A& r/ h& D# w/ Z明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。6 O) l5 s( ]/ p" Z, v
+ C9 ]% H+ ?4 ?* l6 c2 V2 \
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
  W5 l  s$ y6 H. x( I M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
) L+ u+ O! I7 U7 S6 O" v8 Y0 d亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
% ^( m4 ^3 \2 V3 ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
2 [7 ^8 O( O8 u* D8 n! e) E7 \ M 都可算壞了。2 g7 {% I) ]: M7 n6 B: O+ I* A

: C' o0 ]( G$ o3 E) {' b F 呢個人仲掂，
! R- j8 Q) q3 o# K( y9 r0 D知道既唔等於要講，/ k9 Y& M) Q6 e3 X: F# G
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% D3 I7 w0 P' Y% f# Q
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% _% }$ u( L$ d4 r. x9 {1 _* _2 Q  P+ N/ ~; k1 W" k: L) z5 b
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' Q( c- F/ N, U/ d- S
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
# }/ ~7 N1 _/ t! Q. ~6 e8 a; d2 H  y5 d8 F* h" B' z

4 G# U0 \2 \* E3 I
1 {2 ?+ {6 X( a$ y( b* d8 N題外話：
0 V$ f! A6 L- q: @2 ]0 f唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，* G' p# _: e4 J# I" k0 E
睇到 S 呢條友，
( h8 V; G5 ~! b7 k+ \7 A2 ^我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L% D- b  G6 Z( A( F% C4 O  _% C; Y! m

( m1 w: M! q2 j, g8 ?  J: j3 ES: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* |1 ~  i2 s2 Q4 J  n9 i/ \( P& T2 j
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
* `/ _* d2 M+ P( QM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
8 D: {$ f5 ]( C  b+ Y7 w" `B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ P5 ~& r3 M* b. e* m: X
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...