Rika

由最好排到最壞
! @: |+ ^# ?6 V5 N9 i2 ?2 V! v' x5 wF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
  R2 G% h" L+ nB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" u" v  }( N' lS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her1 B& c9 p9 e) k; D, ^) T; f. l5 D5 n
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure' S! H# D3 L' s: I. Q$ w) H
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
" E+ L/ m, c- \
; _# O6 L% z0 l! c! tM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人& i: K, M% m3 K

7 R* A8 o# D1 }S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( F( o/ c# J# Z$ z     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!$ U$ G  e7 Q( V+ I0 N( r* T; k
0 v6 D4 A- q, Y' q8 ?
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做* E! ^0 a" ^  h  K; S. z6 ]

+ U+ T- |" p6 g2 ~( K0 A( y6 NL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志. R2 y$ W* d4 @" L% g. r, N  e9 b
& D6 X: p# A- \8 ^4 i1 d2 C
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
5 d) h, q" g# n+ e: P$ n3 A$ M     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 N3 ~) D0 C1 ^. x) [& |$ ?4 j" O+ u1 \5 U% q! I
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
8 j, ]: I! Z! p) o! N而家答多次
9 X& d9 |' Q. y" r! d2 _7 Vf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽: e) _- l2 U1 B: M1 G4 S3 o; w8 H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
# C' ]+ }: H8 s5 _% ~, X) hb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
( H' q8 {8 s2 n  `! @7 Is: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" `5 V, }$ u' Z' c& A# Hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S# t! n" n# n4 R" Q% }  n1 Y, e

: j  V& x) n0 C! w- b$ yL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 x9 K3 |  r6 C* q2 D0 w2 F
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度/ v# x7 K0 a6 w8 ], d. o
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, t, W! h, L: e9 t3 [. a9 q2 @S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
* j+ w0 \9 N- V3 U  E7 b& nB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
- o, V( a5 e* Q  {. a/ nF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 H( Q- A, W; \7 k) ~
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! M9 r! `1 s+ C& \! A# q4 N+ E+ y5 O
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
5 y7 O/ R4 u6 K) mL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
: V! @% t% z7 p5 D. [, ?( z" O3 r$ hB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
$ ^7 \8 ]! r4 D2 p- F
( `9 m- |- X! }! s, r5 n- s1 ^世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ I1 }- m% C6 m8 A% Q6 C& N
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- U, T3 e0 y6 O
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
3 F& F! O( @; v3 z* hS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件, N; F4 n4 C0 B* H$ v; m" d
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
$ `5 K* {8 t& v; G) c- G& [5 J' \M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' D& z( l  w: I+ K' u( K! `! ]! C; o. A# O9 @4 @/ p4 h. {% {
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
' E/ R0 s7 E! A0 H
9 I, z( ~9 V6 B" _B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  8 e) z0 \9 W9 h" t! m
. ?+ _+ U. r0 t/ E: j4 x2 ]- G
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )2 X7 Q' l) y) y8 u. a4 d/ j& d
9 r# G# Y' Q6 }+ I7 }
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
" Q0 ^8 c. K: J* X; Z$ T6 e8 _, I& T: M5 m" ^4 Q
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
' s# u3 {! i" Z+ m/ v
: {! M0 c+ h9 b; H" W[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
- F# k' r# j# A1 R# L, `/ FM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢! M7 W1 Q- T; Z) z* J0 m
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
* M# b; A) d4 R/ XF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma( i/ E6 J& [, v5 u& j& ^
/ p/ p1 I" o, e8 c! u0 G# `
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
- w# I5 f( k+ Z6 W6 N0 s有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
1 j/ W- I7 ]0 v由最好開始排起既話，$ D: a/ ^/ E6 c% a3 A
L B M F S 啦，
- w2 u' B# s' K: f1 x. @2 W- |' V1 L/ @4 M1 r
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' V* ^2 |9 e6 e) h& b2 q8 v5 S
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 T) p) ~- \% S
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？! Q  B( W' k: I' G9 |1 N# {
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。# a0 r7 A) V; ?1 ^2 y' W4 {

( H6 b4 c$ R3 m4 q而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 D' `' s& C9 T4 A所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，5 g* ?! n. {" b- D, u4 l6 g( c
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。5 A4 Q- H3 U" F; ^

8 s5 |8 e' B. e$ ^# k0 _而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
0 x5 T5 w1 ^6 g7 ? M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，# `4 ^% Z  }: Y! r
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，$ x4 k% e6 O2 }, u' ]
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
3 ?8 _) b: R8 E8 U' k* z8 { M 都可算壞了。& N) c( G5 `) M8 h9 m* R5 |

) s5 i% x& k5 V; G F 呢個人仲掂，4 B+ w* D5 o: O3 N" q7 C8 k# L' {4 X$ [
知道既唔等於要講，
: Y# X/ H, d" J% Z5 b/ e如果呢件事發生係自己身上，+ O# L# u# T( D* F& u7 I# X
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。) j  b7 R8 D6 H0 x) f

! y3 Z) p, f- C最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
; D5 ?- n% K& n1 ]. h始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' N& t3 d/ K/ O" F3 N: e/ Z
% G7 C' |7 v& a( F( K+ B

4 k% \% f+ F6 m, v3 h, I) W! L- c! V1 \3 }
題外話：  l! w8 s5 _# Y1 D* v3 M
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，1 D9 u# ]$ N: d( A
睇到 S 呢條友，" y" n& @( h' |( v$ ~
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L  H, L6 s2 u: K1 ?

4 x* ^; t2 j/ r  u) WS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
% }2 N6 H( F0 Z! w" o: ?. ]F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
  [" G2 S3 M; a! TM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
- m+ F1 f$ _. \' t% QB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
2 p* J, H1 ~' _. S' CL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...