Rika

由最好排到最壞0 G1 x3 M: z; U0 O
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
' \+ ~8 K( `  k8 ]; CB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount' G& V6 I5 i5 y% ]# c5 b: z
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her( f  M3 u# }: l, d( U% m
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure2 H( d7 o2 v- ^, y
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
' f- L; Y" C* Q4 X/ h' n( X  \+ \9 }' i) y2 n5 s- o6 \! k) {! r
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* V' u6 y6 w! t! O' ~1 g) D/ ~, c
4 t' k2 N8 \8 ?( ~. K$ H. _S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
, d7 y( ~6 U) ^6 e5 o" j     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
  B8 e0 z7 n; U5 h
5 {3 m8 g' m/ C' q! lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
% k. q$ m" S) {& W: V
, l' s3 _3 V& a* x8 W% KL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志( h# ]; n1 K; V& A, T  D
9 y7 j# ?2 B4 K+ y
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
. e  R/ a: c0 C/ w; q# `- L! t     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好8 l  ~# N( R$ c% {# R5 u
4 a4 Z3 Q2 `8 @+ ?
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案: x. [  c, V# N8 w7 r* t& l; j8 R& ^
而家答多次' G1 G6 D  e. S% M
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! }4 f/ u5 |) Z: u
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架9 d* ~! N8 f2 o  W" Z& w) t6 U
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢: f7 H8 }, g: p! n( `# w
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.4 C- e# b. J' d2 e4 E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
+ o$ _/ g$ Y2 J! x+ \" W& P( p2 F0 ~7 p/ q" \1 }
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大; H9 l% T, p6 U3 T6 T$ d1 O" y1 o
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
+ i8 q3 b0 _. Z: f9 cM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 g& W: ?  S/ b) G; B/ @
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢6 [, a+ {; f$ O5 C& I
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
& Z' p9 {  R. V! N2 |F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
/ {. e! m; {, DS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
' P5 G# G4 ?5 M' Y2 H6 SM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法2 l$ h* W. f8 Y. ?( P5 m$ ~
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( h/ F6 U) \8 VB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情( a8 `+ a/ B0 I4 |. S

- R, L; U! l1 g3 a' }) v, r7 O! v世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 o# B. Z  z0 f0 O$ N  k
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己, L: H* t5 @' d" Z. c
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘! ]9 }) i8 y1 `2 f% t3 x
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
& `* G" H. h& `, T5 l# UF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
, Z( t& L; r( t- FM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 r( b* i. y5 C- D( e4 z
  J) n# y$ x' ?" h
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ! r. {9 d4 \, X2 X; O4 V

/ j* Y  L0 B) }4 x2 _$ o8 jB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  6 ]) a, @( k3 h- X
* W- q( }: i& @6 Z& `9 k2 C% u4 j
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
' M3 |5 Z9 n' H, O( A' A% k7 e: v% X& _. L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
+ p; P' i+ Q8 @. v( h' S" \$ D& x& H5 X: c2 X
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; C! \" H% m$ Q* D5 P) T
  y! `+ ^6 u* L( `5 J[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge! `# P! s. v0 g+ w7 B- |: ^' g
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
+ U, A7 X1 j% V4 GL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
% z) f( ]' ?/ C/ PF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
) Y" d. U  b: x; J: m& ?1 C3 M" g
' V6 U+ l- N" a) q4 ~* ~最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....( }2 f9 [+ p3 ^5 h
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，  P/ y, k& A+ y4 |) b
由最好開始排起既話，5 w1 T/ Y9 Z! |) l4 h
L B M F S 啦，7 y1 I) C/ j5 D  i! b8 Z7 j

8 b0 j3 x6 _( J8 j  C& H+ s其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，% L  [/ Y0 l! l$ E9 C* C: p% x( N2 B
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- ]" s' t3 r' Z
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
4 J: v+ F/ x1 P/ x又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。3 u/ A7 J. O3 ~; \
  r, d1 p) ^  y$ i9 b% W  `
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 r1 C! V# }% l" t7 y' M5 ~+ t/ B
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，* ~- P! N# w5 `7 |8 e$ q4 Y
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
" j) x& o% h; C+ H2 _, F) y. C3 O5 A' Q" p0 u0 n; s9 d+ _! J
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
  a! X' U  K$ B5 `. [7 W0 K M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，# n9 b1 N& k$ @9 Z) W4 D, y9 T/ D
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，" K, R2 P# |/ x: S, n2 ^" n1 a
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，+ c9 Z1 i; m& W2 x$ c8 `- P
M 都可算壞了。
5 a' e1 U6 q6 N: Y" |+ f8 M3 b" w; S3 g* Y. f: z- \
F 呢個人仲掂，
6 k& F  ~8 I" x" N& i* q知道既唔等於要講，
1 A8 j8 l, d: W( g9 E( @9 ]7 O如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
$ [: f5 ^" s* R$ l  H6 ?我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
! {3 x* U: q! T( z9 _& M# g
3 d! y1 ?  d- j, J最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, N% R1 D' M" q% v* C
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 e3 ^+ D4 b) U9 \9 M) n) @, _8 s1 s

- |) w8 Q/ n  V. m0 \" k- }
3 n! I5 u2 e8 y. x  m2 s
' B: v" f0 X5 j* s題外話：- e9 W9 z6 F2 s- A) g6 x
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，" D0 N0 H. f- o3 h# s7 ^
睇到 S 呢條友，# w. [+ K' L7 n7 y1 h
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
# a8 d# t# u, h( Y  ~4 O
4 i, H4 Y3 z; ^8 [S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
4 e5 l: B$ j0 W# |- TF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
. A. o# O1 Z# f+ yM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
3 O- V$ Q  a; H; j" u1 w' _; GB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ D$ _( R, L4 t5 j
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...