Rika

由最好排到最壞9 @: {/ [# b" M
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# q3 I, T. x! G+ p1 e+ M& D. }B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ J* E1 ?) K0 L, M7 lS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) W! @8 m8 g" J" vM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
* Y" r; k6 n* f0 i- w5 LL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
' J3 r0 p9 Z7 g3 H: ~6 r, b
8 r% X9 r& ~# T* x$ q& @- o' AM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人- O+ B9 X! f6 ]( V) w5 O2 X( ?
% I6 q0 v5 C" N) h
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)& K; y% r- K8 E5 \5 y
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ y4 {0 U8 D6 G& I8 `- o! w# i. l& Z2 c. {
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& M7 i6 H( M, w# x6 D. ]- [0 e
1 ~: k) U, k) t# q& k
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
* R1 m& o- ^9 t6 s" e+ e4 L3 ^# ?* n1 ~$ R& D
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
9 _9 ^& U! w3 _7 Q6 A$ I- \: d     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
# A7 ?, e: H: G' V
1 D+ H$ d- v9 G& |1 s[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 Y, z" E$ A1 V5 E( R而家答多次+ m& N/ F$ \: ]( [( l5 n% W) X
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! ]7 n! M- ]) A
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
2 g; d# L- {# K) X' ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ z' t3 B' I! i/ {% o1 Os: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& A9 l2 ?) d1 ~9 h7 ~
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S: P1 m- c$ i9 X  ~9 K
  j/ [1 _: G/ f; E7 k6 C# S. ?. a
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大# |: M7 u9 `9 U1 S- f; ?+ K8 P
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度& ^) h( L/ n/ {. k8 W
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
$ N; M5 g2 s; US乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
9 F' S: w& N3 H3 x0 cB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' s( M7 ?0 L0 F4 T$ z) W" iF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"/ B0 V! l0 ?# b* Q% _& i- U& |
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
3 J; ]. n6 c' l* |) IM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
3 g/ g1 F' O) {. T  kL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果1 m& q" d' l0 k4 A
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; V2 s' T' S) g" W0 B
& X/ J, m1 v, l% \8 o. Z0 |& u
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
7 j! h" T3 R4 q8 u/ YL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
9 b" k+ i/ a: K& w- p  fB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  U9 ]9 D1 W' s, A: L+ J; Y6 kS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) {6 L5 w5 B, S# M" _: b+ U% ]3 ]
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方9 u  K! j0 s) E0 U5 i: q9 ^
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

) V6 U, H4 {8 e) {: @" w  O2 Y7 t- x9 ]7 Y& j
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 d  D* j" x3 l. k! ^8 B2 m# W6 H$ W8 W) N2 D5 V9 l
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ }3 t- s  D: N8 A% X3 r& v6 j3 O+ u/ y" `- ~: i2 a7 o
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )- P0 I: H2 E, d+ ^' K( A& O
* x! z' @* @, _  w" x6 B5 ?; R
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 2 l. r# @0 G* h( a# m* ]; @2 N* Q

  J4 C+ e6 K/ lM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 e# \# s& U6 r  G& D* g7 _% c
" u  P$ F4 F+ X2 D
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
1 E3 t+ l; N, U; H1 T& uM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
6 ~+ ~" R- d6 s, z$ o& S4 XL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
  X& Y/ G3 [! ]' T0 k4 V/ x: mF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
& C# g8 Z2 ~/ @% B9 Y0 {2 b  W8 e5 |' f: u
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
% C- r3 I5 ]) t2 @有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 w0 X7 f2 a* r! R3 }- q
由最好開始排起既話，4 A% t0 L# C, `
L B M F S 啦，) \1 j$ E0 x- n. m2 E' f

: j  V' L* u& a* `, |, K其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，1 E2 ~  v; ^1 ?  }0 @1 }, P
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？# i+ W4 V8 I% O+ q) k6 m7 _8 z1 o# i
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？2 C; T7 ]8 |' U6 e
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
' s! |, u4 I! L+ I  e  K# T
* d+ Z( V9 B7 i6 G$ G而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，3 K" B% }1 E9 `+ T& i2 ]* M, E0 e
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ ^; j8 M5 \8 f+ M# v- r明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. R$ f' {0 n% f, O! i9 U  `! ], t% Z. P# Q& U6 n7 {
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
* j9 B% A1 ^0 a# e1 S% G0 H M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，" i# D* Z# \/ G: p9 k- o
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
, o. L3 q) d9 G! W1 q3 O知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
& c6 X/ A8 V; G3 {3 |3 u' ?7 O% A M 都可算壞了。6 M5 B! S# h3 ~

, r3 K# j; {0 O+ d" S F 呢個人仲掂，
- N: D, u& |0 M/ a知道既唔等於要講，
& f# W8 `9 m% C) }+ U7 X如果呢件事發生係自己身上，0 ]' z  T5 |7 r) N+ V9 v4 ^* k, _
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。  B% w; [9 v7 p; X$ ]
% u/ ?$ ^. r* I( z
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, Q, ]/ }. ]1 x9 O2 U
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' d- p: B# R6 a0 t
: P5 |5 l1 W, M, P

6 ]$ J  A/ v$ y$ l2 ?
3 N% }, ?( H5 k8 l4 @) j9 _. l題外話：6 z- V3 d, L" ~4 y* t+ t2 G
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
* z- M4 b$ f! B5 B; x3 S睇到 S 呢條友，2 a) I" W3 y6 |& S; R( f+ L
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L# g* y- A6 Y* U6 E
# s- k, E$ i1 J! Q
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
5 [8 f2 ?  B! b9 QF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係* T5 k5 G7 r  V; p1 b. R0 [
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
& w" `0 l. o6 p+ _' vB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害' n6 S- y" ?. {
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...