Rika

由最好排到最壞' Q; I" z2 @- I" F4 K9 J$ q
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
/ K% K& R7 ?% Q3 o: r. e9 i9 KB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
% M( ^- |" m5 b8 {* \$ P4 yS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- c5 O3 h! E1 k# @  n( z- L( hM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure: ~7 c# p" i' G7 t9 k  u! [/ A
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. e# A% }0 h( C3 N0 w" E

& v7 ]/ t" f) z) S) u) l+ |9 ZM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
' \+ c  P: a& Z6 j7 k' A
# \' _% _& w3 D* }, B4 e( ES - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
$ P6 y+ ?8 B* }     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
. d7 j; I2 V1 C+ I: h& Z$ I/ N( {* }, c7 Z: q0 f" U
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做; v- V. M0 H9 e/ K; }2 Z

3 Q6 h" X: ~* r9 K/ i0 uL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: p4 v/ r# J) l0 d5 R
5 E) D9 O' n( Z. V5 ?F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,' K$ M4 ?: L0 e4 k4 F- E1 p: C
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好4 v) u1 e( S2 W: X' D' j

6 `, B! Q! G9 R- v: h7 h; t$ e& |[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ X5 i6 w$ n( n% Z" P* z
而家答多次
3 Z  U; e- [2 a, u7 L4 m. Q) V0 jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 ?* D' V) Y9 N$ x- ?l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架. w! X- o; s7 m- ]* O: T6 A5 C) `
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢% r" n# O& X8 U
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.+ Y! P3 ]& I6 p0 G3 h4 Q) v9 H. S
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
* m! y( M4 b* w4 w7 b. P0 {& }- M* {* ]- P  Z+ `
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
9 D0 h/ q& M; nF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
. e4 ^: I) m+ J( I8 |4 C- HM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒( F! ]; s% x" _7 `
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢+ \4 x+ L- |5 w  l
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
  S+ x  m, _& P* c5 [0 L7 T1 U7 XF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"2 }1 P& F3 g4 ?( i( q  }* f) ^
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- H" [% C- b2 ?7 g3 SM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
( b4 ]8 t! \$ iL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果: E$ d' A; h) H* G
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情) E9 `, f' r' B
, n# l# I/ x  B8 F( y2 }
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:) d6 z; E2 z: p# D- k& @7 i
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- ^. @( A1 G' q
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘: x/ \: G, ?& q# Q4 H. v
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件4 _) ^9 r. o2 y3 P. }+ ?" o8 r# d
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方8 v" T& ^" }( C
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! |! I! G2 f& _
% |* y$ ~; P3 [. S
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( H- h! ~% J9 ?3 x; @/ q$ d1 n' w8 V& Y+ z: Z5 G& W
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  , l8 h: P2 J- c4 N  g. g$ s: x5 f" c

9 J* ~0 v; Y6 D: n# R/ LS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )$ c" }5 z$ \0 |0 R
8 ]" ]& I8 e0 w- }2 W" t
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
4 u4 e) k. G. y* V- R% p$ n6 q
- @( ~6 K6 H" w1 rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
! a+ ^; H- n" z1 L, n3 E6 Z% H7 h0 H4 z% ~) t
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
) U9 E6 }7 X: |- @/ ]M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢, Y* ^8 L2 Z8 \7 R" ]
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點# H8 x$ c! s6 R- }/ _+ s; d4 q3 k
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 i6 B3 P$ P: }3 b' p! [
$ }7 k1 Z2 b! J! F7 h6 C最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! d2 w. x  \* p有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 A' ^. @( r0 m
由最好開始排起既話，
* Q6 R7 f! U" F, X3 y+ d  oL B M F S 啦，
# y/ F. n% n; n+ K, ^. y8 G' ^) T1 F- D% _) e8 W
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 y, k) F! d5 d. N但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* X/ ?" V9 R8 T! A
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
1 I# D- I# U6 [- A$ R0 K又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
$ u2 V' s* i  f) J( W0 h+ I" M- O8 Z2 c+ I& G/ G3 `+ z
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 ~) i/ r$ v. |8 @+ O所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
. D' u! T' F% u# U明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 q- C/ t+ B' w! q" J! U

+ b2 k# Q: {5 c1 W而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，! ~# I! O5 z- m
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，: r0 K7 j. s. j- U
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
( U8 s$ z3 C6 m知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
, _, L/ @, L& H) L3 y2 d M 都可算壞了。
4 [* P. i; V* c+ |5 w
* y0 C0 N5 r# b8 ^ F 呢個人仲掂，
1 m5 t$ w8 {. C, Z知道既唔等於要講，
1 g8 B7 t! g5 \9 `% Y如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
* j' c8 H0 e# m0 B% x0 H我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。+ Q4 \  F0 w7 U3 O8 {
, U5 ?& A3 n& ]
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，$ e4 r4 H" \- l* P( e
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ m1 {: d0 ]' v; w3 Z& z2 m! p$ Q6 d" {
1 @7 U; |! |# h( m
. s3 I% {7 f8 ~& a2 \
題外話：# e" g/ N. Z5 Y/ U5 u6 U; c; ]
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
# A) d2 B5 M9 m, Q# F2 @睇到 S 呢條友，
- z7 K  a! M; w3 ?7 ~我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
0 v* J6 d  g1 }! [: D
9 G$ [6 |2 X$ s* q3 m) JS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
2 c- O0 K4 o. ?: m9 \" c5 y2 [F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係& a5 V+ C7 J  U5 W' [/ p: `) A
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 j5 _8 U5 C& d, G) |" }5 V! P
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害  F1 e2 m' g- h6 ^. h
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...