Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
& H( `9 w5 {$ b1 ?( o: {% r0 z1 z& p4 j2 _0 T7 R
6 U. X: X3 u' y8 T" x
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

: {5 }! ~# X5 a; Z& I  r, E0 k% L2 t; [8 T- o3 I9 ?
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
8 o7 ]2 U" T' q; R# q# C0 i
  o; j9 l+ t- Q9 }8 o! m) T& W
3 Z+ F9 z8 G5 C5 jIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ Y- i/ `) B1 c
4 R) [% ?$ z  G2 `9 D+ {oh really.... D" f/ c( z# X/ m# W1 M
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"5 B9 V" U/ Z4 a6 o0 |9 Y" r' [( S
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 B5 z8 ?) o0 C& K# A

% {* J8 R1 z' l2 z9 C2 V+ p當然這是個假設性問題
# w3 H" x( c* W. v; [" W+ }但將人數倍大
7 D$ _* t0 e/ Q' m$ \例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 V- B4 U8 ^" o$ G: w- E$ I(情況可以換作其他)
- h6 d7 p5 t) i, U' ~始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
) X: @, a; \: k$ C1 L/ Q5 c2 |如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 n; L# P: j( R4 J2 D% B
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
5 L. s; o: ^% q$ P( N8 e絕情谷既問題...7 l1 e+ o: ^5 q* k# N+ h5 v
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 S( |& o8 F0 W# v+ N9 n如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

9 \# {) C2 a) v) S7 f4 Z& W殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好4 U' B' M6 V" h
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生* S- r/ y. {! R- L7 q/ ^
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩; `2 C1 s/ K1 c$ i5 g, R
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
7 I7 Z, J; {* J. I6 j, G7 W/ C其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
+ p" w) ~2 b8 M' B
3 s* c. a6 j8 y$ ]( `我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
/ K3 V+ l  j" t8 j/ A; K0 S5 o不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
% l0 c, r0 T" u" [$ Y) X: A其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ N# v5 g0 B3 ?: A' o2 {2 l5 e  F, l0 E1 {  C2 X, h# O6 J
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' r" d) N5 h6 }3 q你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....1 G$ @; d( u/ K# j4 t& f9 }
+ ^5 \' f2 l* |% v$ \0 \- M
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. ~  @$ e) |0 Y9 ?
yes, my reason is helping more
' t5 i! D2 z' C$ ]8 c3 A& }. Xfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 f  l  C, @+ E, q- I  }9 y( Mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
4 j- {3 Z0 K8 [7 E$ Fbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
( H( i" P- P) p  Ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
. t  M7 D9 w2 @0 g- T7 a- Ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!3 c0 x" f5 r: L! Z  p. g
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
: r+ v* n3 b. l8 C$ d4 v+ o! [當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
6 u! G5 \% o' {, X& r8 i我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
) ]! m; B% F4 `! w1 X# g1 D8 H正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~& Z6 b1 ]) N5 b9 |) `5 y6 L
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~& J7 M# D/ O8 J  j% a6 _
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~% Y- Y9 z& n- W+ e3 {. u" S! P
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' u* q  f! n; l, S6 R1 T我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）