Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:" N7 G  b5 a. s1 J6 `2 W0 N- z
; T2 l  K) `& Z, L7 ?: x4 x

/ G" j& i. g3 N4 g- E! c我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ k- R* u/ v& n: Q0 t4 D" z& Z6 v. ~4 M! Z, D$ I$ M. y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:. `7 Y! U1 p) a1 i

, D6 P5 U: y! ~7 ]
5 B8 E0 r; T9 O! o. }7 |In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ u. U$ b" G3 ~% C' ]4 l9 M% T" n( H7 N2 a/ c+ Q
oh really...
$ e4 x0 i: S- u- |hahhaa, thx a lot^^"8 Q8 W1 M6 E+ y) c/ h
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題/ V) U8 z+ D) s/ H& u
3 v: L- u0 k* _- W
當然這是個假設性問題! P6 u3 ^# L+ d. _% U
但將人數倍大" Z) K; n/ ~" {$ l
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. e' Q( t5 l+ h7 c4 s(情況可以換作其他)
* q, Z5 l/ L4 V7 R9 e1 c" N始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...% u3 v9 n+ B9 E& r: b$ i5 F/ K
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% N" |: l! I  D6 z3 N- O
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 C& w9 X/ [+ \- l- u絕情谷既問題...
2 a) y- f( i5 A3 [1 i如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
; S. ?5 I% i% f# Y. q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 r; o. {' |( a8 t1 e; @& T7 Z
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好/ J5 W! T! u9 K' p
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 ?. P/ ~: H# n* G3 M0 t* P
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
  Z0 x5 }' V+ B6 r! N' M+ F好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
7 J% F( L2 K, i2 r* k) t2 {其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
4 }' e3 a, {" I$ b. W: l: V+ e- K* d0 a+ W+ y% K) g" b
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命, p- B5 W9 S" J: w5 Z. l
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
! r8 ~  G, e% W其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  `, R4 g# f9 |7 y. k& Z& W  Y
7 m' u' Q0 x  P( c0 d; G# {; x* Xhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣3 |. H  m7 J7 l7 U4 }$ d
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
' r0 H) y9 g, [0 O# n7 g4 M) `& l& P4 C$ O
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
/ F5 u1 u9 f& v, X9 J+ Dyes, my reason is helping more
( \/ i& f5 F! N" D$ ?* ?/ v6 J! Efor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
  r2 F6 x# U4 B6 Hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
2 I- b. V( @5 Y; M% {) {- M- Fbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?: K9 |+ R7 @; E0 E8 k
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!4 T9 Z8 V3 T9 O+ F- D
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
* F0 d0 S, M4 \6 X' X5 \3 I! Junder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
! p' ?+ V# s) \! e1 S5 L. q當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# G3 m% J) L2 D& m我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
, X5 G! w+ }& }8 G# U- S" @5 Q正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
+ ^+ I, K* H0 y, P即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
5 `+ p! e* S1 P我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 ^; A; ?+ w' W8 X0 w9 N
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' X1 E* m- `0 |% D我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）