Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 v3 t% u* @8 y. g) k: ]# a* S$ m/ i7 \

! ~2 N) ^# `% F) H我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ d* P" p; \  W- [, k: Q/ \8 L6 N7 S- b) [. o
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:4 x5 G: Y+ N  F+ W* @2 C# c

: r, P$ P6 M# s  R2 P# b) ?
  p$ y2 {4 z7 e3 Z# \6 GIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

9 e! g2 i) K: _3 r3 B
) p' `* g5 x' p8 koh really...) n" e0 s7 a9 T
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"* C! p- i  j$ P% F9 i) t' b
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" M4 z, d- d4 R$ i. v+ Y
6 x3 ?* q' E. b7 l當然這是個假設性問題
$ T5 n- w# p& B4 O+ q6 M$ ~8 E; t* Z但將人數倍大1 ?* @' d  H5 a. Y) H5 J/ h5 \! I/ v
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個0 ^8 N/ `! ^" i; P- L
(情況可以換作其他), c% ~6 m) ~- L7 M
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...& t1 X( y" S: h) n/ \' I, K5 G1 w
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ z' p$ j) A2 _; _: K1 b2 h: V& ~% m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:+ r' d6 S+ B' ~, C  C& I2 W1 Q& R. T
絕情谷既問題...' L  |8 o* q' W) N
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, z$ l; b8 C# ]0 x如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

/ }6 ^) ~, M1 W5 y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好) R. j0 {! O# @/ {
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
! O  P& z7 b" _& j但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩( i! [# x$ D; E% p: X+ H
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
  F6 J& C. R. r+ ^% [: U! d- N其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢" |; j0 r, x* @0 L* Q

8 K) F4 P- y# ]9 O4 N$ W$ g$ ~7 C我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命' K# O/ i' Y; Q! @
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:) t0 l* q/ \! N
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 b2 u0 O: j2 p6 h3 Z( v- f% \: M0 P+ v. G4 T- g
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
/ [* y# R9 k7 ^" _你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
/ l  H! ^' D9 c6 Q& T( Z6 b. v8 p* f$ N% [4 y
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
6 {' z# L7 Q  U/ L' ^  V3 }& |yes, my reason is helping more3 P" j! T+ @8 j. j
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
$ X: n' a, j) `2 dif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
/ c/ Q( n4 d+ _" E' o! z( Zbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?3 D0 I/ N% e' E1 k  p$ `/ x- Z$ E
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!& O! c. D( P5 M! f& d9 u
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  r' v/ h1 L$ `: B: eunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
( J6 F) x6 Y8 j' t7 H1 y" {. t當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~( G, O7 i* n2 Y2 {" B4 w
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- d# K: y' \- u& J! T# h
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
6 A2 s( @% o& m2 S4 w' T! p/ O即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
. J5 k9 d% {( [# X2 c我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
5 v. y* `! M' [) b4 Z/ |) r3 E; A' ^但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
* J! K" l/ \7 y4 r" W. w我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）