Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
- t* ~+ g! \) e0 w
8 [& `. q; D- S( K4 |. q
, l+ V# ?( h- e6 u我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% O7 e5 e3 }5 x4 o, r, q: i

; k. v5 Z. q5 WIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
/ M0 d+ b$ b' }
& [, C5 e' m$ a8 d( X
, c, o, k) x. A& ?5 u- V+ t* [- sIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% P+ \3 S7 F. s1 B# [% E% N4 _

4 d# Z6 R& S4 {8 |9 D' D5 voh really...
( Z% Z/ X" N/ r$ ]; |, fhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
& y  v4 H) u/ ]2 c. C7 g/ o# Gi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
' s0 |- [: Q! h$ ^
0 y4 {* P5 u$ X! i5 R當然這是個假設性問題
' O6 O  C6 V+ u; P9 [, y; t但將人數倍大
6 G3 N4 n# [0 y3 a例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
1 s6 E- Z2 J% g" S4 \(情況可以換作其他)
' f( s$ v" g; P9 K0 w% J, e始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 d2 ~9 o/ D$ p0 G; r+ R" a( M
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
! x$ j- F! G5 L4 _4 s) y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
3 s& L! Q& W/ U絕情谷既問題...
1 a, U, A( @0 E. A1 X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ u; S% _6 @# `8 t3 \% u4 L5 W如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

& C& e$ c9 z, j& b  ?殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好' I9 |( q" @6 i) H7 j
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生# W3 K0 h7 l% _
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩7 }( u5 f: E/ n2 B
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢, U( E% ]1 ~7 q3 A
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
" L7 ]' P( `1 q! \+ u' I9 @( p( c% l' y0 l3 _% L7 d+ N. c( s
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
- f) q, T+ r( b/ _不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:+ J3 \4 p+ o: ~8 ]
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# Y7 h& p+ A1 Q$ Y0 I& n5 v( h0 {4 G. p
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣  i4 @- q. @- Q' p/ U
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
; c% N% w" ?( m* M8 |* k  ]
7 z0 K* _7 V, J* \0 u: Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
/ K; u# P& K& M  E& yyes, my reason is helping more
# c- {1 Y) C$ S. ]for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
$ h* j) g( l* q9 J! J  Gif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
) H) ?3 G, a% [1 o; ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, o, e6 M. {, Z7 h+ ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
8 T3 G# i) f, I; C2 g: o, l  S6 {may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!. |( n0 |8 ~) m8 s+ `
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 d1 R- R: P# `6 a: U; o! l$ _當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~( m* |: t$ U( A3 f2 T% T
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~3 U6 v- w& p7 D1 ?; w
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~! q5 y3 W. M' \  w3 |/ @, F) U
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
$ I1 g6 }' l* V我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
, B& Y, _" l2 }; ]但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
3 s( G! g: ?5 }我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）