Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
3 }8 j5 e" K! _# A# @
; j5 t9 L& h% ?0 n+ h) h- m# J! }0 i2 ?; N, Y; _3 l
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

1 }* B5 ^9 ~1 \& w' N
2 r- @" ~1 c8 c. m, v9 q
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:+ h- K& r3 f) t8 e" |
7 `. I% p# m5 q
2 V0 Y, [9 g' y" W8 Q9 K
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 b1 {+ ~4 B. m. u4 u
2 w/ U8 ]: j  n3 ^* Joh really...
4 M& b' H) Z  c1 d( z4 B" q3 ]hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
( K9 }9 n% a1 @" r2 x3 m5 p  Ei didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題9 ]' p' s; S: [2 D! \

7 ]% j% G; m& C3 _當然這是個假設性問題5 }; s6 s& h$ i& F' B9 C6 N: y2 n
但將人數倍大; p) |4 c1 a$ N, A$ J. Q5 f
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個) C$ s/ h& G9 k$ [7 h
(情況可以換作其他)
' L5 Q- o+ c3 E, i" p1 ^始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...) S9 q$ f' E# v/ E
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ x: B5 I( i4 B1 x
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 @6 z% k' b5 L4 ?
絕情谷既問題...
% F, V4 L/ N8 W. r如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  N2 J, l* ^, A, t, w( a% b5 a5 s: u
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 u1 p8 C6 F; f) ^2 Y" o( V, _, u殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 W5 X5 l8 s# W7 h6 E$ G3 V
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生! O+ Y* B& o" s% o! o8 ]6 n
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩' b7 N+ T$ ~/ ]$ `# ]+ R6 [; @. j
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 L# y% e1 |/ M1 s" U- R
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢0 `2 D- Q1 ?) _- Q6 }8 k2 w' q2 g5 ]
# y  U2 `% ?/ c' ]
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
6 R8 S' S- Q% x9 b不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:- n* b3 ?* z+ W
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

7 g" g2 a$ O4 M. L- j4 C9 c; |4 I
' v) A. b6 a' e' o! D  s8 g. k8 s: Ihaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣2 A. f$ }2 ]" w6 |& h
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
' {# u. v! z4 X  R; X
8 {/ J: q1 G) e6 p4 D( y; Qp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
; _3 }3 ^: ?2 l5 z) A: |yes, my reason is helping more
7 `& R1 X' b$ ~for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
, o) e& q" ?. p' z: G! V* f" F! d$ b3 Kif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child+ v) O- ]4 J- i7 x
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
5 G! W4 @% {2 yalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!& B& V, F) T" A2 C, v
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
' B% v5 z" w, Lunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
0 l, i9 y. r2 Z3 w  q6 M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~2 s. c5 [  V' P3 c( A4 T: M
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 O8 R* y! C- Q- F2 k. i
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 d/ S' o: y+ Q* a6 r8 j' _6 n! S即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
$ k# `- B& S: H* j% L' O我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
  C) q4 I9 T* P( K+ y. f6 c, v但如果o係當時o既情況中~~. ?' u- _: y& _9 o4 w' D1 g+ b
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）