Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:* w: L6 ^( Z6 r* D6 B1 H
& w, D* [, P7 ^  V
* j) \( r! x/ U0 b( D5 K- h
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 @" O  x0 K& ?1 a6 {  W

$ @8 D2 z$ ]& X) Y( fIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:2 G# |( o+ {& ~
0 {7 b. a. s2 r' L; W5 H: w
! w/ f' v# l- f& c5 P" ~! z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& W  s& R% ~) l- ~" l; J

4 ]1 i& ?, [4 p6 V+ Qoh really...: `7 H9 O' i3 ^- t  ~
hahhaa, thx a lot^^": [2 o2 @; i: c3 m9 d$ b1 W
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題, g  }% {3 z# e- t: h7 I0 f/ j
2 g8 n$ A( i& \7 c/ X( \! b' h
當然這是個假設性問題$ x& P8 @4 [0 ?4 X% m+ D$ S! J" D# d( y
但將人數倍大+ \9 @* o9 i/ ^( U
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個" _1 p' V7 H: I7 ?& M# F
(情況可以換作其他)
$ X1 w- U: f# ]9 B; Y- L始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
( f! B4 \* ^3 s( X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 c. {0 x0 p; z! k
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 g" N$ V4 g3 V0 i0 S
絕情谷既問題...+ \  j1 \: o) x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 t, k: j8 X7 \+ V* ]( L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

. s+ R! J* h& [" d* o9 i) c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好9 W' C6 s3 K( o1 [6 c& U0 y# N$ o% O
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生: L# I7 Q$ ]) @" U+ W
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩' h% c, c! O2 H2 V/ L) y* O' X- W! g  G
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢1 x# A# @. g4 P' n+ W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
  B, q, x! \/ Q& k" a- q' u; C: ]$ R
; L  t4 L$ q1 \5 ^* |! V; i% N我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
" g1 x' V. X4 q3 ?3 x不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:- @3 S  v+ c  i: ^5 O8 \% a! K
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 N4 g: L( A" N6 Y3 [( |! f- P

0 u5 s" b! D* O# O3 i' V8 j7 H* F& O2 jhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣" C# Q! y  K% P( s8 J
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. d1 X4 F! ]9 d+ y" J2 T& h0 r% i( L4 Z. D1 k- l
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
: @' w+ R, f# i) U3 _6 ?9 kyes, my reason is helping more' Z% g5 p* q* _/ o
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!- O4 X5 i; I1 M( W) m  T
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
; k! T0 ~0 u/ nbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, `' P/ `5 z& g+ O# U- Y8 Aalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
! `  [" a# ^+ T" @1 n. Y, Xmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
* ^% R1 @* T# `2 w- I$ P" T$ vunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~: ], A. I6 I: m/ t( z8 m
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
! u$ a. Z/ I! g我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~7 A3 s5 o8 I# A7 t/ F
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
  p# `6 G  @8 C即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
2 W! ]) ?  ^" ]8 y5 |6 f我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
) U" q' K0 [/ u% B2 x) u, Z但如果o係當時o既情況中~~. ~- l* s$ }9 U0 [
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）