Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) Z1 M6 E7 k; @. j  ~
- u3 p% x- I  u, y1 u. ?1 g3 F5 O; z! @, f% I5 d9 m5 R2 |
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

5 X5 F( z  M, P) h) K

! E9 R. f& c3 f2 e  r* ]6 QIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:+ ]/ i# _$ V1 Q5 A' v/ l  ~8 f: [# X

' }) j, R* x6 j* |0 j# q' F5 `6 X# D: P  X
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- Q" A) T/ M* X* O+ \: z

. m! F; T& _9 L5 moh really...
3 F0 K$ l! j: ]' o6 ohahhaa, thx a lot^^"4 q# h/ H. A4 }* Y2 N0 x
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
9 v2 J/ O( D4 [+ s
/ X8 ]( P2 m  k3 i當然這是個假設性問題$ c: L% L8 A7 ^3 r/ C; w
但將人數倍大* N9 {7 f4 b' g3 p- `# g9 M
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. x  H) ^1 K2 |! W
(情況可以換作其他)
1 v' K5 s& l5 }' U+ P# z- ?始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...8 f# Y8 o2 c. ~  m9 J1 s
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# R6 ]7 W  o6 x8 ^如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:# |# h1 ?5 \- @; m0 G
絕情谷既問題...% O+ W) U$ g- X- y0 c
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* j- a! }* ]- c0 z% D& o
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: _  g! O) |- ^7 q# U/ O1 l1 i$ ^殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好( S5 k2 Y( i/ z: m( u+ I
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
% t: r( v# w3 ]# X  O/ r但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
7 e+ z: u- c6 x3 N' U% [; J& w) g好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
) ^5 n% X# w9 h3 e) ~其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢6 ?: C: b) |! J# I6 \+ e" d* g2 \

0 q6 K* t( @; h8 A6 i+ [我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
/ R9 z5 R) [6 J( O. T1 k2 U) ^不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:5 J: J) L1 H/ H6 J9 E1 V& v6 P8 b( [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 K2 O. A+ p' ~  b9 V* J# e: `- L6 }! S; C5 M3 I
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
9 m- Y$ z3 [# N  g& m% _) R你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....5 x7 N' C7 L' h
3 V6 t  W0 |" M- f9 g
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
- ?, G  F# D6 syes, my reason is helping more
, i( o0 r. i/ p# Afor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
0 F+ s  l  K! R8 v! i! _  S0 Hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
; p& \$ O6 ?1 D# s$ [because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?; ~8 C) Y- G* h, M" z
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
: G' o" y5 S. F9 Qmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!0 {: C  s+ _# J
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
: r( Z* S( W3 P  b  A當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~9 t& Z  [  W/ A0 p
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
* q* f0 \# p: O7 j正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~% L+ {3 O6 ~6 Q, y  h4 ~
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
' U6 H( S( o( V: G( |8 a* r! k我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
5 q7 v' d# e5 u7 M4 C但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
  G( {' S- i1 t- i我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）