Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# J( H  N: k  D
0 i: ^: c$ [6 ?& s; c- j

( }9 v4 G, t2 W, a$ q我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* t+ D- B4 q3 P$ d/ e9 ^# w5 u- D% c$ b! @6 I3 t/ Y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
) U  V1 E8 O) @/ ^& O$ |3 e9 B  k5 j4 W, }6 h

/ e: r6 M/ V$ v* x9 \5 M- p( F6 L1 vIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! y  ?& g* }" U: b( K6 }% W
2 T7 {* H" s! V: f- h4 K: M
oh really...& k7 g: w# u$ @) x. E
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"1 M0 j0 s9 c. Z; s8 y5 \
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題1 W- }: [- W8 F9 I

7 ?, J8 Y( ]! C2 Z" `+ {+ t當然這是個假設性問題9 {/ {3 ]* f# q0 @& Z8 ~
但將人數倍大  I7 f1 q# q. D; t8 m9 d1 T
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 d5 z( C! J9 v8 U# t+ [8 I- y(情況可以換作其他)7 f; D8 i( O8 C! n3 j  S$ G9 d1 H
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
3 x) H7 x5 M) Q7 c如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 o4 I, l5 Y8 M5 x: y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( ^" g$ W) @8 Q+ Y
絕情谷既問題...# z2 w" w* \1 f* r3 ^7 |% Z1 r" ?; H
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...- r$ N2 D9 J, Y9 M9 Q  |: e( d
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, T& e. q! q( W; t+ l殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好( Z( N# @% N, w+ d
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
7 {5 U  n5 N9 f; L但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
" Y, d! k4 z  L2 f) ]好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% H8 y8 K6 P$ R4 ?, K
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
7 K0 h# ]- \& f
. ?3 v" a% f& |" f9 G8 M我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
( l5 @9 j  m, U2 ^2 {不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; k" t2 G: |. d! X, C8 ]
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 q& I$ t5 e" \9 n' j6 Q
7 b* v; W# a* rhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
, N; h# C' f0 C% z& A- q; a你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....) c3 w9 t+ O# [% [

* J9 b2 l& t8 I, \# C+ Sp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. O  x6 ]/ O$ S" x# e; e% i
yes, my reason is helping more
8 k  u9 u) A! W8 U5 i- R6 Tfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!7 |/ y) y- O' l' g+ q
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child  l4 W9 \) o4 }
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
5 E( }8 F$ m( {6 ]1 k3 malso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!$ U" N* L( Y# e: g$ ^
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!) Y0 s0 @/ ~4 D: q9 w% A
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
) G3 S8 h7 a) t' ]當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
: y5 B% z8 M5 ^( E2 H; ]我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~; Z' \/ B3 w( P
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
; l+ `% }& m4 ?) ?) `, m即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
2 Q% b* A  |* T% S3 F我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~) \% z  ~: }* a% n2 L; Q
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~  |$ V$ ]2 I' x* w' I
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）