Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:. ^- ?7 i8 |! L6 y& s
+ r% v; n+ t7 _' L9 ~

+ I& s& C( E1 o1 {( s我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

, n+ X# y3 v- O7 D. K# N% t

: {4 W, y. ]7 Q6 T' d& U2 \% fIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- b4 p- U, N- F% \# v0 j% ?
: |/ A2 z0 B* g9 E

( R! O* Z% d6 Q7 HIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  S, ?/ @$ X% x, ~6 w& h
' N' n2 ?1 [' Moh really...& c( A$ G; E4 V: W6 v! t, J
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 F6 q. J# T: e$ r) B/ i4 S/ mi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
" p7 N0 f" e2 |, m$ F9 `3 `$ g& M: A
當然這是個假設性問題4 e4 P4 z5 X9 s
但將人數倍大
. {$ |1 C) @; X6 Y例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
0 i' G7 h/ G& Y* U3 g(情況可以換作其他)
' T+ J% q$ C( q6 |' _始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
8 A* d0 x+ }# ^* B4 k; ?+ d如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' V1 j' q8 w, @9 s0 b) p+ r2 @/ [2 e如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:4 i  e' P' ?/ x  f
絕情谷既問題...( Y& V3 M, p( ]5 n1 H
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ u9 ^5 v! S6 w8 i/ `% z
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' o  p; P$ g& ]* m1 Y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
+ n) f. J' x% j於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
# N" j8 t3 }+ T& C9 c4 ?! g但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
  u5 _0 o# h* z8 ^" g好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 U& b, e8 v0 I+ Q* D/ X
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ t3 V* k& N, e  ?- h
- ?: w! B6 v" R% O+ K+ h
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
7 m) r4 M! [6 Y& }7 A* _  }# Q- b* |* I不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:: z, L* |+ X! N/ T6 k& ~5 [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

2 \0 U& q6 y8 A$ |7 C$ Q1 L+ S

6 u& J3 \1 F+ j; O, [4 z, r" `haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣# T, t4 T5 C/ J2 S" U
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
0 I- a! Q! ~! @6 K- g8 Y7 V3 Y% L2 k$ q- D+ u% _/ r
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child, W4 m" `4 h% B- R9 `
yes, my reason is helping more
8 W; w5 @. u. C/ g) yfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!+ r* e6 G1 Z1 o0 C! o9 e0 v
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
- x& `7 X2 o, e# P9 L5 ~because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?8 z( m' z5 t. z. ^# ?
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
, i: R9 ?% K' p% imay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
6 e% K; I# W0 m' F' ^$ Junder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
5 }1 r; [8 l! h5 S5 j; H: v( X  L當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~& s! `% L9 N1 J3 e- O
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~( f: u. i' H. w4 h& o: K
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
  I! k, t! O' U7 N即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
' E( \- S6 v1 Y  f我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~; ^& @, d# L: ]
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~& O- z/ d8 f% K& }
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）