Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:8 |' m( N  P* B" t
) {: n/ x9 A7 Q# d" F
7 {. `# O2 W7 r, {3 A
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

4 f; I$ h9 J0 c

: {+ \! m3 k, AIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:' f0 f& E! Q3 `: |% [' @0 [. K: H# ]

. Z$ n* s0 p! Q2 J
7 `# ^! M5 h) f- S) ?! E7 mIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 x% O5 ^; v5 M7 D% w1 L+ o5 R- V
0 h7 G6 I' p& j% H+ m8 _0 ?oh really...
0 r3 m" H5 V* I* ^* Y% Whahhaa, thx a lot^^"3 Z7 R& K/ z6 ^1 H2 R, X
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' r0 k3 n; J" d& I
( {; u3 a9 j/ I9 H' A5 v5 m7 G1 P
當然這是個假設性問題* v$ e  Z1 u9 e+ b
但將人數倍大; u" ~" o! E% ~  X# B$ `
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個# x9 P1 e  W& A8 q( z
(情況可以換作其他)4 H4 i( b) L9 s. o) w% w" e
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...7 R( s5 n# y2 ~6 t( y% P* l
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* R/ `! m0 E# Q3 }# I
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:: M$ P5 S' o) F
絕情谷既問題...
: Z9 K* G4 F  m4 Z$ J4 Y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( V- U4 X$ J9 B5 K  i如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

2 |: @1 L3 M/ X2 X
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
+ ~2 V& H% ?6 B/ T5 K5 q於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
% w4 T4 n" e2 v3 ~7 ]( A但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! B$ V2 j8 ~) D2 L' ?. i' p& x好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 B# Z4 K7 }* b2 I) ^2 w: [/ _
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢7 i3 Q/ S  |6 \4 `# J
7 N; X, Z9 r8 o# e* _& [2 a
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命+ z4 a. T/ }  x: \7 [
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:& U- M# v4 W' l# M# H# N' b; @1 |
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ x4 }! n2 |6 Y6 Q! g

1 j* }% k  v/ Hhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
( p( S! r0 w' g! f5 k' U; G+ R; P你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...." k" ^( ~# t% Z7 ~% a6 I
# ]) e: [; V" T+ h  P
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 f1 h6 ]) ^$ P4 Ryes, my reason is helping more
% [; ]) i1 U; M8 Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!( u- w' U4 K0 T# @/ O# ~
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child) x' T. t8 G& k% B
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
3 ]4 Z( A! {9 }3 q7 ?7 s2 }also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
! n. a+ g  G/ B$ k; v, x; amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
0 L6 d2 U. P* Yunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
. m" m4 X  C3 N/ ^當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~& E# [7 i& d+ E. U0 R2 z- U
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
* u. A/ E% \$ p- E/ _. }正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
8 W8 o; G  W3 f" y" B- @/ _4 [1 d即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
. W% }" r# [3 [我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
. e+ I6 l+ B  A- u% `  w但如果o係當時o既情況中~~' H8 G, d. O1 m/ ~" ~. |6 s: r$ m
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）