Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
9 c3 _+ `1 y3 I+ Y( P% A. q, r* X
8 W7 D5 o( A# x: A1 D- k' D' q1 A5 U9 \4 [
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 b3 x8 e+ F* ~/ T. i% D

- d) D9 h% x0 S6 X" oIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 b  j$ ?! |$ I  j  K  W

0 s/ U, x; Q- U& q9 `+ Z- _  X% r5 A/ [, m% T; m
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 T  V* Q/ f' x- }2 J/ o
5 x# P- Q3 R! Eoh really...& x  H4 X* i+ I8 Z3 X1 m1 d% t5 f
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"! z" P9 a2 p0 P5 L+ z" o
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" y! e! J7 c" V

9 h1 H/ c# A0 N  B9 S當然這是個假設性問題7 k1 ^! j4 N: \1 `" B  \
但將人數倍大+ _7 ^" n: s9 w! \0 m6 x4 o
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 h! V6 G1 x, b" C. z( A(情況可以換作其他)
; g" @7 x1 T( R  H始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 T! G% Z/ Q  ~9 L2 ?
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# V! r* R' ?2 r- [  B! m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
3 H, I; O. |: s) U& h絕情谷既問題.... ^9 k7 h1 R$ m3 Q+ l- {1 b
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." M- G8 v* K" J: _- e. X
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

; G% w4 F% ]2 a# [7 y殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好3 r8 X  ?, r# F7 R# G1 @( r& z7 ]
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生% J9 @) {) S/ M( A3 \- V0 L' b
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩/ K8 T% l6 C) t) v7 z
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 i  ?" P% L/ i, ?5 ]2 l% D+ z其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢% j+ S) a8 @7 X8 }

& b* t8 c  c! F2 T' P( B9 z4 S我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
9 c0 ?& C! K; S  |: u! i不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:$ I8 E! C* Q" n& p5 t. ~
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 U% n7 i* x- X4 F
! D1 C2 _1 \- \- g8 dhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 ?7 C( b) L4 G你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....* C. H8 D! N1 p; G1 V" T2 p# {
( e9 `  t& U$ [' G! N
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child$ q- ?+ L: E& u& a1 M3 i% `
yes, my reason is helping more
* a6 @2 v' x# Ifor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!4 Q/ d* }9 P2 W
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child  N, R! z0 W5 |9 {
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?. H$ G) ]$ i. t
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
# x( D' K9 ~- |# Vmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
; Z$ J3 G6 s6 Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
' K6 W3 C/ B) u6 s; ?; j當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
8 x5 d0 r+ @; g0 K+ }- V) A0 V5 N我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
# H# w. l- `1 _正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
. d6 _7 s+ R  o即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  S8 F% G2 a: {, `, m; k+ T
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~9 G$ T; e6 K+ U2 j9 \
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~4 \9 E/ A' o( b/ x3 w4 R9 o
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）