Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:+ [/ v+ M" s. `. }  I

/ Z' o2 x: U# p2 q; g2 C
, A( O% U$ O# D1 S我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% u1 I3 n; |8 j) S' ^

: k6 |* I, _! @" s! O6 mIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
0 R" H% I$ K8 i* b8 d8 m9 e4 u2 B0 n& M0 b) a" {$ ?

+ A! C' s1 O+ VIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

. G- g4 X5 `8 ~
$ c0 k" K9 G8 j& g+ O1 c/ J/ o7 R  }
oh really...
- A# q! f4 j' H+ V/ I0 h2 M% i6 Dhahhaa, thx a lot^^": K+ i' o+ L2 l7 Q4 h4 k
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題) o: ~) }2 y, t% B2 a) F7 c' S5 y; K

5 b$ x) o8 b/ a當然這是個假設性問題
. O" n# {5 {7 Q  J# q7 y' C但將人數倍大
8 c- ~; k3 ?" [; I. x例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
' w! x+ _! }6 [2 ~/ Y0 O(情況可以換作其他)3 q+ P- L( s) D9 t7 v: v$ B
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
+ G1 j* C, _9 j' g/ d% Z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" F# z5 H) p- z7 H9 e6 ~, O如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:$ p8 @% C% a' S' o1 E4 S
絕情谷既問題...5 N( M- G& v. @+ p( z' P
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ B2 t" y2 d  p$ F如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% |6 T5 z3 G! i
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好& E0 M: F3 V  q/ g
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
6 y# @3 \1 E6 c7 X但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- p. m+ y# O% Z  p5 C好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
' m7 d. W& o- ~& ~0 R% K8 X5 m其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢6 q; g( e3 `8 }1 ?) N

4 D" @5 P$ E5 l* t9 d* h; n我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
  \5 V( K& q  A+ z3 @6 Y, V不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:5 O' B$ q: e) Q' e% G1 k5 P4 y
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( H- f! v' P6 x2 O. K% z3 @4 [

3 ~" s6 S; Q2 n  _* k) x# \  dhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
; |) r7 B- Z1 o7 s你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....6 A# x" O2 i7 f2 n/ w+ D8 z2 F  D$ u
0 N) y2 p2 l* L- R) e1 x- x
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child1 W2 [0 h8 y, U; A
yes, my reason is helping more% y" l& e7 E8 R+ f) g
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
/ K- I6 g/ A, O' T/ p) S/ P* b  w7 b( Bif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child# \, T1 s; M$ \3 c% `+ [5 B3 V: l! _
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' o; k2 {, B! ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
9 b! w7 _, m2 w/ _. h( ~/ zmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!8 V" z, H$ Z& x9 q. I! [; t
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~0 E8 k3 k! Y4 `0 d! D& E0 O0 A$ N
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) L0 T: |  @5 z- E" p+ m$ ^+ q6 T' Q
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
8 A, E9 J7 i2 b9 Q正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
& ~% s* u3 b1 y; k即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~% S, u; V. n" A* z
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
  D4 E; P+ T( F* A- `/ Y但如果o係當時o既情況中~~) g7 j) Y$ |- @6 L& a7 X
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）