Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:7 b; I) \" `( M, h

4 e3 ]: D  C: a, V0 C+ I0 g$ ^" R
3 z% v3 a1 ]% L2 r. A我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

$ a. J1 f/ s& r0 w$ A# P
& W: I4 `0 k( _( O& V3 DIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
4 G! v/ p+ `5 `% \- j0 |  }! j, d+ `% I7 v

. ^( c6 W& t5 }. A1 z3 V+ I) s$ [In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 p$ Q) i+ L  W' R1 [7 t# o" ?* \. b$ c, R" E# q
oh really.... }) m! Z  j" Q/ l! R
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"& t# q0 j0 V6 S6 P/ |: I
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
* k9 E+ G3 C; B! g8 _5 V6 m/ o
  _4 x& V9 |1 j9 G6 B當然這是個假設性問題
. L/ `$ g: C* i6 g8 p但將人數倍大4 d. I* n% g0 v* O  w
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. ~4 g% U8 C3 z4 ^; r: g(情況可以換作其他)1 x( E! @; T  l1 o9 H' I
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
' F. ]* D) C7 c* z; s* J如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% S+ G6 I7 R7 E1 `/ v
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:5 V/ e$ c3 X( t2 g# C& p
絕情谷既問題...6 m- `2 o7 I( t4 M
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 U: D( N, s0 E如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  O" X+ e1 T9 D# D3 e殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
$ h8 ~8 r. n( c9 K( E- Y  {& n2 u於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
1 k- {8 u. O0 r$ M2 v6 t但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩. O: k; [! v! k
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢' j0 _9 i2 e" b: f
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢8 e% T) s/ A5 _- |
+ n# e2 Z' k# e( y7 ^- [
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命9 k) ~  T' ~$ x; ]8 S. X: c2 D
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
& l' W9 _+ A: t/ G' m) O1 g! A其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

) ~: M- d  P- \9 I; P9 d1 C2 d7 Z( Q
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
+ Q* m1 Y5 o( a' e! ^. G你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
$ l  H! }2 w8 x/ L; {" _/ }
. F" B8 _, Z4 C) F$ lp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child1 Z7 F# S9 `! f8 s+ |6 I& N" w& w9 \7 H9 Z
yes, my reason is helping more
" H0 a6 b" z0 b% H# l7 ^for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!4 }* r$ u5 V6 n( y7 v
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child* K# L/ q8 M  u3 r$ N
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 y; s' s  A9 x6 ealso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!- e$ y. ?( s$ ]! p0 v
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!4 c+ m& ^# J3 i0 N; Y" H+ L  k3 g/ M
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
* N4 P* N; x) J  G9 M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
6 P2 k. ^7 K7 p' a" c我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
* i: g" M7 V' Q正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
. l4 I  t* f' Y6 ?% D即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 {# j6 t# z6 B9 a
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~( |) t! [2 D* r8 b8 ~$ \2 M0 A* y
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 d) v) s+ F8 v, J3 z* M- ^% r: o4 {- {我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）