Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
: Y6 H) F! |& k1 Q4 a$ Y1 E; u' T  p

; a/ E9 g' w7 F3 W我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

. C% b4 @4 g3 W' w* U! h( Z: ]8 F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:. e. `3 O8 Q9 y# s" x' d1 M* f2 }

/ z+ G; z/ ?- B7 a& k
& j* S# `( h) Z8 T6 L5 K; {In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

0 I2 y! `5 L6 K' a( r- I
& \; I( [, d" A1 H* `# `$ }9 coh really...+ b5 ?" p% Z; c( ^- m+ N
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
6 s; z- B5 m1 S* P, X  yi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題, R% n8 a: q6 {/ B* b$ Q

/ }# w' F$ c+ T4 ?/ P當然這是個假設性問題
9 T6 N, _  l3 Q& f5 x" ^* W但將人數倍大
2 `# e2 }0 J- h$ \& m! Q例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個' Y0 J" a- N1 t5 l
(情況可以換作其他)
# G8 r6 o) U3 j! m* c# x始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
& k2 \2 G$ T8 r% ]9 ?7 s4 h如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ m% S+ Z* {0 t# J( ]. P如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
# z2 J/ F& Z9 h; n) |/ j2 M& m# |: n- U絕情谷既問題...: d; |4 c1 v# D  U  U9 R' [
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...! L0 J# l9 m) ^8 V
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' z0 D: m1 x: R
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
1 W% e* F  v1 H& l: B, [+ G: [於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生( Y& P: M6 V8 F" J$ m5 A# P; r
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! C' F+ I  s- R4 C+ H2 y$ Y好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
- g) t9 J% d5 r6 ]: T# S其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
  ^! j/ c# k4 K# O4 N
" E2 v1 R4 y# Q: I! Q9 U我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命  Z/ l! b; X9 _2 \0 y
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
4 G, e9 Y, U7 b其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- z6 Y, v# k/ a5 k6 {

  m4 t# ~* s. Y$ E8 mhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣0 h  c# L( I! H9 F1 V# k  `
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
  r6 m  X% {  @" d$ X
6 H! M$ `3 S/ x9 W  r! Jp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child) d' w. X, X! h$ U9 H
yes, my reason is helping more
+ q0 y6 I$ B0 @8 ^- Wfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!: {) \5 @" c; q4 H8 q7 R
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child3 d4 f6 U$ g7 A$ A) W: h
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
; o" o8 M8 v2 X1 ^' X9 ualso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
) E/ H4 p! \: ?5 H* Zmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
1 Z2 W: ], e5 Punder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 ?2 P! M$ E, k) B3 `8 ^8 z
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~& h% i# R* d' S/ T  w! a( {& f
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
3 N+ C* @1 G. h# M. O7 [2 r正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~, L0 g) e" N6 ?
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
( I8 q2 O) o: v7 `% V  U$ E我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
( _5 o5 G9 q' V5 i5 x但如果o係當時o既情況中~~3 m( w9 T: H8 P9 q) ]. F4 f
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）