
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2006-1-30 12:38 PM:
ME
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-30 13:22:) G& S% U$ k" q5 v$ m
姜維真係咁勁?
佢輸俾鄧艾鍾會幾次ga bo...........
Originally posted by 托迪仔T at 2006-1-30 06:01 PM:
羊祜![]()
Originally posted by hung414 at 2006-1-30 21:08:( n ^* V! r6 y9 Y3 m
. L) F1 O: F/ S! L1 l: F! ?
yes...he was the great one to unified Chinese
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:22:% l, q+ R% E' o( `1 i( H
司馬懿
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:24:8 L# f% ^2 a$ y/ [0 G" E
0 \( D9 M5 d/ t: A
! M- Z/ i* E9 p
唔計司馬懿呢?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:25:* M9 ^5 i" ?& [+ n" d' e i
! T7 t! j- n0 C. b" P9 |% }( X5 y
why?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:28:
# L8 O& ~! m2 I2 N' T$ E/ U. e C
智慧高之餘﹐又打得
) H. q8 b" R8 k" x( B: j, i
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:32:
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:39:* Y! y4 \) o" p/ L& S
Just I think
第一五分,第五一分
諸葛亮:5+5+4+1=15' S0 m& }4 m7 k' y9 ]
司馬懿:4+4+5+3=16 T/ S) o0 q6 P6 ~+ u
鄧艾:1+2+3+4=10- r4 u) V7 f7 t* I4 t6 q$ z6 |$ D
姜維:2+1+1+5=9
陸遜:3+3+2+2=10
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:
( s* U- u, u2 E) u ~5 {
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:
; h8 ?5 W' _. T. L
/ S5 f. Q6 O# q! e; b4 }% M# C3 ]
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?1 P8 D |% p- B& B+ c% Q$ E: F" A
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較![]()
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50:2 S6 y! i9 [% `: X- c
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:
他比孔明更偉大
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:$ d0 p t2 _# z: a9 @% a
- h% u _2 {: i G3 k
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:
yes, that's the point.![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 22:20:9 G" J: z6 c" M; u- A# j
1 [' e+ E' n/ V, q" k4 ?
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終......
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:29:& |; w: K4 X# S5 _8 u
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006/1/30 21:32:2 q' W# b- I" M: ]. O8 Y
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:* J" ?8 Y. ?8 Q4 {1 o
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............5 `( r7 b9 [6 i7 A9 @' w
6 P7 g& A2 P0 p3 b
係咪如此?
Originally posted by benny0105 at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:! \- ~* W6 R4 K# K
$ D4 v! ~' d t1 n# U
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...+ n' a8 z* w5 u% M0 G$ x `
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........& {6 J6 A& t2 l
佢勁係勁在治國能力............! w0 Z2 p# S- E. f' ?0 W
係咪如此?

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~4 t6 m! P7 \3 W% s
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm
5 `; m. S2 m; F2 n7 C* o) h; I; dOriginally posted by step025 at 2006-1-31 07:13:
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
...



Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 12:56 PM:. m6 p. r1 x; w/ N# V9 }* v
P.S 曹魏後期頂住蜀漢姜維主要係teamw...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 12:58:3 e, Y" _$ N7 B/ A2 o
. W6 ]% ~" H9 c* W) \
我打機,姜維係最勁
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 01:02 PM:
4 i" h$ Z+ Z$ T
, _# Q# ]4 g; T5 h+ B& L8 F
打機鄧艾都唔錯,但正史中,我認為鄧艾勁d
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 13:05:% Z) b7 D1 y( g* E5 n; a$ I/ r: O
點解咁講
" I/ ?2 H6 l7 v! V5 A. Q
[ Last edited by abcde1918 on 2006-1-31 at 01:06 PM ]
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-1-31 02:05:8 b* C& B8 v, q1 V# V
. i! N: Z% G9 A: X! i* b. j
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風![]()
Originally posted by 下......... at 2006-2-13 05:36 PM:
姜維智力夠高, 諸葛亮又將兵法傳左比佢,最勁當然係姜維啦!
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |