
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2006-1-30 12:38 PM:
ME
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-30 13:22:
姜維真係咁勁?
佢輸俾鄧艾鍾會幾次ga bo...........
Originally posted by 托迪仔T at 2006-1-30 06:01 PM:
羊祜![]()
Originally posted by hung414 at 2006-1-30 21:08:
yes...he was the great one to unified Chinese
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:22:
司馬懿
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:24:
唔計司馬懿呢?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:25:8 p0 {. ~+ U5 m" p2 o
why?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:28:
智慧高之餘﹐又打得' @6 C4 _1 Y. d3 R$ L; s+ {1 v( ^% g" e, z
' n" G& O! q" R0 L4 H$ N* F
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:32: W4 ]. I; _$ K M1 `4 N8 g. T' i. x, U; R
8 z/ W4 r$ g6 h( d* E/ b
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:39:
Just I think
第一五分,第五一分! O" N, a b. G+ k% @ L* v
) {( ~, n9 Z8 G+ i5 m6 q/ a7 r
諸葛亮:5+5+4+1=15) Y* R2 j! \% k2 G
司馬懿:4+4+5+3=164 w2 b* r" b2 L- V# |4 K
鄧艾:1+2+3+4=10
姜維:2+1+1+5=9
陸遜:3+3+2+2=10
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:
! }$ P: K- m% q9 @- _- q( H% S
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:
/ j5 q5 u( {* ^' `1 M$ d
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:, B6 }+ K1 ^- g4 p& x% {( V
6 V0 J. g B2 o4 r7 J% S3 A
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:
5 z6 n6 k: H2 X2 Z' [" W! p
L [, V$ `7 a
why?# H, o P) U' E8 k" Q
% N% J) m; ?5 A
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較![]()
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50:3 ]0 ~, t0 N( I* s
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:
) t" a- B2 B5 v, F$ y6 Y/ a
* P: h( k8 L3 e' C) z
他比孔明更偉大
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:/ N$ C- y( J' X, ?
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:
- o' W+ O) Q/ \# v
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:
yes, that's the point.![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 22:20:
% o; Z0 a) N( k1 J5 [. t" `3 y6 C
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終......
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:29:
+ V: B) _$ H8 |$ `. i- n6 {$ V- B
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006/1/30 21:32:$ l/ n- |2 C) ~ S" N1 ~! G/ J
; t6 _0 g. O: C5 x
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:- }" o2 J7 _# Y" s( A9 N7 T
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........* Q1 R1 V5 ?$ e3 @
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
Originally posted by benny0105 at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
5 r6 J* Q5 d: U8 n6 F" w; K- p5 l% g
5 d4 u0 T# z; u
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫... H' N1 g, Q% p8 o! z
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:& a/ J8 }+ C& W; i/ s6 P$ d N
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~# b4 b; f4 B* _* x
http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm
. m2 T, A9 [8 Z/ u1 G. v# l3 {Originally posted by step025 at 2006-1-31 07:13:. J1 H* h: { F' g0 M
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
...



Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 12:56 PM:
P.S 曹魏後期頂住蜀漢姜維主要係teamw...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 12:58:
我打機,姜維係最勁
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 01:02 PM:! d" l4 w- e+ q2 _+ N
4 {9 |7 a. Q8 }# J/ c& k
打機鄧艾都唔錯,但正史中,我認為鄧艾勁d
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 13:05:
點解咁講! M$ D3 z; o. m: D, L* w
[ Last edited by abcde1918 on 2006-1-31 at 01:06 PM ]
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-1-31 02:05:6 t9 m- d+ H5 }4 F } }# I
9 v. r; M* d6 g N5 S& }
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也0 m- c H# j$ d* L8 q2 y6 t
沒有佔下風![]()
Originally posted by 下......... at 2006-2-13 05:36 PM:
姜維智力夠高, 諸葛亮又將兵法傳左比佢,最勁當然係姜維啦!
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |