
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:4 c- Z" |. E$ x- R, Z; T9 a
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:- D. ~1 i6 U( K. M
各位brother
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
2 ]2 p" m. }" Q" z4 r- G2 ?
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
, ?5 x8 [ o! b
6 d% i; _/ U5 n- y% R; ?5 C8 {' }
好認同 !!!
good point !& d* p4 _) }; R9 A1 t5 |
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
; z6 S6 E: p6 m" {) N
一個市場有幾多個廁格?6 n0 Z8 U+ f2 w3 w% Z% C
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事. R4 ?/ N0 A3 Z# {8 n' ~, {
+ o: c8 E9 S( F' Y8 L: W3 |
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:3 \: E8 c3 M H, K# ^2 Y# W
{) C: D. m: _$ K2 n
出猫并唔係刑事的
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:# P" L' j x7 H; g" f# w4 A
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦
點解要出猫呢0 @/ ? [# J# }) N
出左,又唔一定會合格
有機會佢d答案錯既, p8 x8 c& e; i# ]! ~, `* o
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢
咁都會有個網有d會考資料
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:, g# b2 p9 ?1 z: q6 }
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出. [ ^: D& V5 Y: ]
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪# n- x0 ]. B; q4 D% V" E4 H
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限4 q2 s3 B8 p8 m$ Z o5 f( L
, S6 K/ i- w% y. s, |
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:, V; X( g7 F @; Q" e
刑事係要舉證的
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:" a8 W; N8 v, c6 ]6 q+ p
* a& @+ P2 M9 t
) P$ ^; M9 y F0 A% N. f
$ X' `3 W0 F S& [* D
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事( V4 J* B! M1 n$ i1 A/ ^5 V
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度+ u3 j! B) {) t5 q; V: ~% ^
要查IP呢D野# s+ n" I4 x3 h! ^! v' ~: O* u
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
6 w1 ~7 ~, F( c- q
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左9 V* I" r. W/ H" F6 ]1 e
- `$ ?$ Q6 |9 p( _" b) H Z
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平* G; O% q( {6 T& W* |
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
8 j* }* N, k2 r( s9 T
9 P- i* Z* A N' W
取消得一係就+曬
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:/ A# k( b" z6 ^9 S# |( b$ E
: V2 q7 X0 i% M6 S
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪/ W) ^& s, Y& D5 `
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
( ]' A* Z2 k( B5 w
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??8 j4 G" U+ o8 I" m
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
7 d1 u) v5 v# J
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:9 U5 c! M7 h7 ]9 @8 o3 F8 K4 Z
4 {$ F8 ^" {6 s' C0 [
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法
就係冇相關的
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案
- Z, S# i* H4 J% I' i
9 r% b! _7 B7 T6 b
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:
3 F2 ~& b6 z" | w% I9 E) w
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:
/ U% g3 A4 _# Z' Z& ^8 ~2 x
& Y- ^3 v. f/ P7 [$ ]& o& I
偷窺只係作為例# z: c+ O" v6 H3 r, g' M
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例' _1 Y- I4 ^% Y# Q d
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法3 I4 i1 N6 h& J* v9 e0 _: n
% R3 k# S3 c. I' L" E
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:/ E. I+ Y/ @ Z: ^6 }& V u+ M
* c$ m" h" X' L% T
8 g7 U1 O9 D1 O( ~: p; ^* C, Z
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:; ?- W. M0 h- \( q8 I7 ]9 S
' m+ D3 N. n. q' x& v3 p: A- a
我反反問8 i+ Y. ]1 @ S2 i
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:2 v- k9 p" _ C' g( X/ Z
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:
重唔重考唔重要
最緊要收到成績單之後
唔好又走出黎話3 [7 u! k# ]: {- T. L- E
唔公平要重考, B, `' ^ h# j3 o
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:1 Z& i$ Z# ^* R; R( S
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策* y6 _& x" i p( d% G" e/ @- s
各位brother睇睇, m/ ^9 I; | C: e! [
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇$ c* o: R. i- }
有左對策9 r7 u# H% e% \9 L5 N' T5 [
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:2 C( A/ a& _& a
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:; f* e7 Z# I( {* i# i% P, z& H
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:9 R2 i$ `9 h& C- a! z$ f
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:9 }0 S$ ?! Q# V( K
* i2 k: t+ H5 E: D* e& \3 p; @
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:! }, n( o# B- S# ~' \$ _
i retake this year
* h! E7 V S/ k2 R* c
i really dun...
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |