
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:% C, W6 Z+ N; W. m6 G M
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??' s" t( k4 C: k9 N6 q7 W# f
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
/ o+ O/ w/ {# I( ^0 M
8 q7 s& M7 G/ E+ w
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出6 l/ a& s1 a L) E) `- B
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:9 D, B* \: h+ U( P" b! f" C
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:3 U7 Y+ J9 j, ?" ]1 t5 u4 B h
) g8 C: z; l* r
同意紅字哥part# R, V# H H+ _
( s8 \' G3 Z: }0 s2 Q9 ]% d
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:# S7 |9 b7 \+ I$ s. J" s
* u6 @7 u/ v m3 G& E& {# c) b
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:7 l, x- k0 e3 w$ Q) G5 C
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:) k' D4 {5 z+ {& d$ p7 \0 f, p9 x9 s0 y
# T% g/ j/ d! w# T1 g
7 I# c5 s& }/ Q7 i# x, h9 j8 g0 u
同意紅字哥part5 y3 a& _% m, p* I9 A" P" ?, `9 @ O
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:: O2 C3 `& w: j2 X, b
) e4 P. h; l$ F
/ y$ u. p7 V6 [1 y" O
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:3 ^, B0 c7 d0 h# Q4 [
同意紅字哥part7 C. a# ?5 _ Z1 q; d# s1 t7 Q b+ c
9 C: ]) S3 W. u3 |
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:9 Z' Y/ @: L- a
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:4 C" j6 a7 t, I8 a/ C
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。( N4 `. V3 g2 o* D x
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
6 q, V, t8 `) \% Y* t& |' l
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:8 \$ R# g0 e3 G, L2 w
多謝讚賞 haha
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:# D7 W2 U& P, O9 l: @" a
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了* N4 F ^( o2 R
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |