
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:9 y; I6 |& b; I# N! H
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??" n, r Z+ K9 \! Y5 U
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:8 h( O2 h. M' o
, B x$ L9 n) M" ]1 |6 u1 k
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出; Q J" W K- y& K& U' h
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持# |. K) N- ?0 X- O5 A' e0 k* g
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:1 u7 u* |1 F" ], s6 [3 ~6 z/ \
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??- l4 r' G1 u/ U z4 [
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
' B+ R% R( W- S1 Z$ m! h
...唔係教徒不看..) {5 O( G/ R+ a6 c1 z
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:' w+ l4 I6 Q$ R5 {- k0 w
3 y' n! P+ w6 S! |) M
同意紅字哥part
+ L/ K' R3 E9 k# ]
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:: M" G' M+ L8 K$ L5 ]3 V# S
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:1 ?8 P' R4 d p( P' k. K1 d& Q
0 [+ G8 K/ @/ K6 Y
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:8 i' Z: w+ x! N7 A! R" H
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
8 i0 D0 K F0 P1 ?" A. X h* y4 H: x
同意紅字哥part
, ^$ g: M5 l, z5 y! t+ O8 N) w% l$ t
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:$ Z1 i) K) m, f: L8 B
) k2 s/ s; @- W+ ~6 W3 K8 i/ ^( T. {
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:8 o( ~. l2 h! S% \. F
9 i0 Y" T/ \7 A2 @7 G" ^* z3 E6 k. _. @
同意紅字哥part. F. k: h3 x7 ]% R7 K9 B- S
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:9 M7 i [$ T8 \: {
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:, V2 Q$ @% f9 h }
" M# g' E8 i6 |+ N' _9 F# E
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:( D" N, ^6 O. o, U1 I! I
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
7 J$ ]7 m( m) i8 @/ }9 y9 T
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。) u6 g8 c) l& x
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
) p1 g2 U6 q$ u
8 z4 S/ S0 I# X2 Z2 T: c
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:+ u" Y, b; [! l8 Y
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
/ D: O5 i' s: e0 w
' N. u: X9 e& f5 g# M) ]- H2 ~$ Z+ X
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:) y* x0 ?& L) Z; T
& N$ ]! W: t7 M( T
- x z- H) ~) n3 s( E4 w7 ~! d% P
多謝讚賞 haha+ ~* p7 \5 e* N
/ D6 S4 |5 s& R; D
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:- W8 c, V; _0 P' G
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了4 g, A1 ]; }" x- I1 U
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |