
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:: s- O2 n9 d: O. d) B& m: j7 I
點解今時今日先會有投訴??+ z! u% p# l- ]7 I! k
本野出左咁耐都冇既??- t" \# t. ^8 g1 I1 G) A
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:+ ^9 m! B+ Z" e$ E; C
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持: T" z& b9 {2 B4 r7 @% I1 f
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??( E& B- ^& x( J0 P
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:% L) E5 H) S D. Z( F
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:- k- r4 j/ x* C* e/ R6 o4 M
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
# ]8 v, T% M, r2 R! W, q [
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:+ O- k$ [% x4 Y
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
. b0 ?8 I+ v3 Z3 {* N( j
/ M- @. v2 ^7 o3 N% ~2 |
同意紅字哥part7 W; T9 N! E* [0 G2 Z' F
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:( |% e3 c8 E! ~6 U
j- V* c8 P( \' D% M9 |
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
7 ?" B. l/ |( R9 [. u4 b& s
同意紅字哥part
& U2 C: m5 p& h0 Z
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
$ _, J5 Y C; j* Y1 U
$ g# q, a/ Q* J- o( e: A% L
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:; r/ g- R% v6 n" m
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:+ s3 Q* N: {8 b: E
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:6 d0 x1 f8 @& h3 e# ^
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:2 o( j) `) O+ P
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:% a- P* j0 Q& p: L# Q6 R6 J
( P) \ u- F5 {5 L
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM: K6 z0 g. ]. @2 r& g, w7 n
; q& M( s: w0 I$ L- F: w
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:6 ?5 L7 U! G! Q& Z2 B* E" w6 D
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
; Y8 j6 U- @: d5 |" C
0 h& A! b5 T! l
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
6 x& ^; n- u& F7 a. ]& H7 j) f
多謝讚賞 hahaL8 ~: F0 a6 i! z& b
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了1 ]0 u3 t% p2 `! k' r! @
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |