Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:' ]! a/ K2 \/ e# X8 k: I0 o2 @
4 G7 j% C: k* T& Y
, j/ L/ ~/ Q' \/ f0 o' D
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身+ f! E0 E/ ] F) F' h; x
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出+ @1 h: g9 p) }
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:0 x) A% H9 [1 l$ D) ]
點解今時今日先會有投訴??5 r1 k) n$ G- A* h
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM: H9 w: E) U3 d5 ?; C- R
" G; p1 B8 w1 C1 L
...唔係教徒不看..4 X: [ D k; U( N5 v% U# i3 n
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:" W$ E5 T! A6 M5 `* @) P. J
8 t1 V+ i" k: g2 C% _& U3 S
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:1 h* b$ |, T W: O S
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:( |7 m/ q5 W) D" O
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM: g8 x/ W- H9 e7 U8 S7 q1 G$ }, p
5 e G* n. U8 f9 o. C% k9 T0 }$ E3 f
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:2 Z1 S ]- q( @8 V3 {
, w2 x8 v4 a9 \/ L7 j& D
4 E0 R- R. n# R+ \+ k
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:& b6 a3 {, l" E
& w( H% u( K) H
同意紅字哥part
* G4 _/ S7 S9 ~" p, x
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:. f9 @' Y% n* |% d W& `# T
# a" K0 m5 t% X. F
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:/ H z2 A/ h6 T
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41: R C& R' T- \5 b
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:0 R7 `5 r" b' F
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:1 A: W0 k+ ~1 R- J% E
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:. N! v0 Y: N. o, e' ^6 S. y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:8 S* D# Z! u1 b$ ]
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:4 @8 r7 x! s8 F$ X: g7 z$ H
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。9 w: Q2 B2 R# B) C0 B+ g$ \
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:$ i2 U% q# _- J3 G
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:1 v$ b$ b0 P! f, @
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
+ v0 Z8 D) {% t4 Z. I* ]! j
8 a; H0 V! z% I: ]1 v1 p+ ^
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
! i& a3 c5 K2 |8 d% Q
多謝讚賞 haha
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:0 U: W& w5 }4 G$ Y7 d
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |