
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:! U9 @: b9 w1 l% n7 \: w" ~ n- l
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機.........
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:* l/ z, s @9 l6 h1 }* H
7 ]/ I% [/ ~- I
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????

(新人除外)Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:
; O+ B" w6 u5 v6 Z" K
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.

Originally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:! a( q! U' j, g6 r i( R# V( W# E
& I0 z8 a/ a d- f
" v! F! G+ @7 y% Q( S* V9 L
6 m1 R& f2 @3 W1 k; Y( s- e8 q5 G' [
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:( c e$ u3 E, G" h3 p
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:
我其實有一個問題?1 w" g+ F( h" A, h$ g$ L
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??9 D+ [9 P( W9 X
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:
1 ?3 L a3 p2 A( I
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()


真係唔係好明
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:7 d$ N% Z5 W# V7 d; Y0 h
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
% `9 s& y/ W: I. a9 k3 b2 [
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
; W) S8 M! e2 E3 N. ] P
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
1 o" ?' a9 r$ r! W: r
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:; y/ H+ H) m$ C! d" i
' I& T8 i% D U: _ ?3 D
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:4 Y7 a" H% } H0 B/ Z J$ s
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...


1 S, ]' l+ [: V: H


Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:
3 l( T* Q5 Q* U7 P
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:
5 e+ w5 P k; B/ j
明白晒! t7 i8 [- S8 n i7 F
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:
8 |$ @% j2 J( |2 K, h
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......% O) Q( ]; S2 G. `9 ] K
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点



4 s0 [8 y5 q; b3 w( O U

(雖然我知道自己經已答對了)Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:4 n% K- U& Y" ?# A
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
/ o K$ L; j- m& y& r. \$ }; \
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:! v' Q- x( @8 f2 R9 x
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...


8 c$ M4 r" X7 b



Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:
哦.........原來係咁r& z$ h* i8 m+ I
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:
# N8 Y1 }) E: \; [; R! v( ]- X" h2 T5 @
冇嘢![]()


0 I6 J- w6 a) M- t4 g6 F. VOriginally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:3 F! A0 Q5 J+ F6 ~. Q0 Q
& T) ?& [: _9 J1 V0 I
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296: K. A+ Q1 K5 Z4 i9 h, b5 G( m1 O; m$ _
#8869
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |