Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機......... : a8 {9 K' u4 F7 j
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:2 D" @5 Q" i1 Z$ T) `+ f) i, @% M
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:
# o1 p* f) I- k
1 m* K* d8 F5 T& L' Z6 A( h6 ^3 D
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:' Q! e1 k" z! {% k8 `+ z9 G
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.
Originally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:
, L' L1 [( w: F/ s8 o6 a
; Y- I& R5 K5 p3 Z8 l X
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:" G6 S8 W8 m# X. v$ ` [) y9 K* I- z& k/ ?3 m
我其實有一個問題?( `6 `" W m) y, ^/ k, z
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??0 e: ^1 r' S4 d' e8 v
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??" B6 x6 o3 `2 _0 y# ?
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:
8 E. F. f* T7 H( N5 W
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
$ o3 x4 H, Q% P0 o3 ?/ U0 y
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
% E% G# n% z; ~% n$ \
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:7 _+ E; f/ S' n2 g* _! ^" Y T0 o
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:
$ w2 U. q( _3 a8 B
4 N& N6 H: A7 g! X
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:# n' ~8 j9 A5 n0 f e5 y# n& B& v! T
& b2 ~% ]* u9 ]* n, Z
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:
1 r& [. A# g& L
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:7 B- t7 C1 \ N, `# n1 |2 \
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
1 }# j) q. W! y1 e5 C# W
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:* L# x! i3 ^, p2 r T
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:1 x7 k' `& b# a9 [/ P+ p
* J+ v/ q' N# i: v6 ?6 {, {
哦.........原來係咁' n L# l% y$ L m1 q
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:8 V) j1 @0 K1 p
% @9 x! J% X' t
冇嘢![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:/ s6 t2 B; J, j0 ?" U- p
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:
; i( Q: x, X7 }5 j$ d/ b* O
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296% i3 ^4 @& Q. E) e
#8869
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |