Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?
4 q: ^1 S, D4 x: l  N之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖: u  D+ ]+ {$ f7 Y2 U/ @
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:  ?  e4 N& F! N$ k! m
港台e排發生咩事呀?1 C2 g( x" n7 }, I& ~- L# Q
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖! F* J/ U7 P. o9 |7 N
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
# m& G) N$ {4 P2 k
* H7 n6 @5 C2 l0 _9 r- r! e: I特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:
. Q  w/ g4 Y; B% k+ t5 m9 l! k# v6 Y1 P- u: H+ @! D5 {4 ^9 w' i
8 l/ ^. C" l% N2 a3 P! A
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
" C8 x2 e" T5 L% v. K

0 a( P' p- e* ?3 R& z之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:, {( M3 i: C! g1 k" r8 {
0 ^4 C; ?% Z( }- y5 I+ r
, \. O3 X9 }+ @$ s
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
+ L7 f; _; j& N( G+ z0 [
) m2 t9 k9 E: x. {& H( v) ^" T
=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:/ @. C( t* b2 [4 j$ L
+ w1 r5 B* @. I' e4 y+ I
3 P6 B$ j6 d. c
=封港台?
  k. @2 l: _* W, s  N如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:2 ?7 W# W, e8 s0 [2 I( w# m: H
: |: g% D+ d! k0 Y5 ]- M% j4 o
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
( O1 a5 P3 }9 ~4 w9 E, n
. O4 i+ H7 |+ b5 q- d# w! ?
"如果"
* a3 _; [7 u) Y7 \6 b) g3 X8 n5 D3 P; C" }  t+ K  v3 ~6 B
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
% c; \! f/ `3 Z  H
7 w  z. ?; l$ Y8 i4 z* d
2 \" B5 K6 l) ~, c. @"如果"
& V" A7 i+ u, n  O
( {0 E& B3 [3 N3 ]5 o/ Cthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
0 p8 L/ D) _% v4 B
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言( o  V, r4 A4 v) }. H* T1 D
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。8 T, O* b* g3 D& E3 U) K
: d) f6 E6 \- R; p# O: U
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?
2 L( `" t/ j5 m- a8 c. I6 r
. Q3 H$ ~3 u2 @" Z5 Q當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。: v; z! w8 J8 g8 Q- k
2 p8 X. o6 s! e5 _% ^) P% ?
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0