Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
; s) i% \9 _, s& q" E! h港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
' Y. Z1 [1 V! n: v之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖- r" ]2 m  c4 n" `+ W
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:8 T! o. \6 D- n* K& D  Q
+ o' r5 N' C2 K  k

# ?! m1 @0 ?8 e$ R5 q6 n特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:% |& D4 C% R! j0 E/ e, c
1 p3 n2 w/ T0 S1 N
4 F  ]- D1 ?& e9 J, w
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
) B( j* _$ H5 b7 `& Q$ k- ^2 y% K! x# t6 Z6 ^8 |

# t3 H- Z% G: y7 q=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
8 z3 S' R2 y1 S5 L2 @0 j. H" _8 X, s/ z6 N) p( D5 @
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
! C1 K- o! Z2 H5 H2 x5 u/ I1 J! C! O3 _$ b7 g
3 Y$ K( z( D  a7 o8 d: W
"如果"
1 G, D: }9 v  z3 p# N0 j. P0 m; \! ^5 b4 n) w! A  S
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.