if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！$ I" q K5 T9 j
4 x8 u e8 t$ R7 o% x4 T/ v只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟# ?# G% C/ f* {# R& y! i) h# ^, \2 \( R
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 % R- N c# s1 ~9 T( g- x& K" v; I6 C) H0 x/ h% Q# B5 u( l, O* ~
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 8 c% o0 g: i5 e( e$ \! E . K: J- T" [% T7 C[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 5 |5 a. G: K- t! B
" F! n, K+ g9 H: U0 p. U
2 l; a7 C+ |9 F
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, , R: t. e" [! k# W9 M. t. xand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 9 D% }& ^7 p5 o/ z K- P$ u ' N2 V% @. w: i( N2 X. _I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. & t9 G: r7 i1 c: Y: E i
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.! k( l- \; }* l2 K6 X7 f8 W3 W
Well, just my personal comments. % J0 R( M7 W, E! R7 y/ p! i0 S, H
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...$ a/ h5 S' h2 F) N7 o& h
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
5 |5 a. G: K- t! B
