版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. , q, R5 \) L( Z& t( A4 B4 w2 [1 h1 s& C: {# N! s. ~1 n- c* G/ |
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.( }5 E/ x5 i, T' j, Z6 R! A
4 A. k2 C9 e$ A" n- b# k ~
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 4 V. q5 w& l( B k* U1 B # W% G+ R. K j只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟& m7 `& S: c! s2 E; A5 M
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 c b' V6 n x( E9 a# l ' t P! s1 o/ {( {7 Q強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！& O3 j) Z8 ~5 ?+ {9 t
) |- ~: A, f! I% |) S, D+ x[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? - i5 P" ?& @ q' I# X8 y 7 B7 O- X S8 @) K6 N0 _ ' J# P" w. {9 R$ c4 e+ QI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ! A9 O" D2 I$ b0 Jand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....( r+ S/ C; _, Z h5 _0 X
- P4 U' S: w4 p) T8 P+ |/ KI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 7 n0 T; E: b, g. p6 a: r( n. cOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. ' g" f# i+ J3 M3 Y Y: JWell, just my personal comments. $ v+ r M3 `1 S! j. S% m1 F8 L J; {* F: W9 A# I: p7 C
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
