if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ # v# j4 w1 Q) H ' ?$ b+ p+ T; o% g只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟- l( {$ b% y* K" J: D- e
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照9 f: ^4 D/ F6 [& R
' U/ V7 o4 }, \6 z/ M; K
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！: G6 t, q a* n/ Z
9 \4 A, i: a- n
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? , k7 [- j4 ~' u5 k$ E6 ^$ W+ s
j# k+ ^, ?- Y) {
7 J$ W: K4 Y7 ?4 G0 m
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, * [5 L7 l' e) L% p+ k3 ~" Q- E7 }and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"...., R l) e1 ]7 z, e8 m4 s* C
; J& F/ u! w9 C. g) z( d; dI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. - p6 B$ J2 y; I* {3 bOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 7 c9 L6 G6 M/ M$ K- I0 Y6 a* |& ~ r }Well, just my personal comments.% [" F; J# O- n4 ~# [
# v0 N- i1 j5 G) ~, {8 p
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
, k7 [- j4 ~' u5 k$ E6 ^$ W+ s
