if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ , }5 p; N; e. m! f 1 J! m( j2 m# I只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 + r, Z! C5 P) G a8 F0 t% g- L3 x不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ) o7 g4 {/ F) p! W; n: _, z, h4 @* y0 X6 i& a! Z
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！4 U, A, ] v1 z
G" G ]; ?: H( h5 ~+ S6 k* O+ q[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 0 V" o& |( U4 J5 h! z
0 h4 ~4 V5 w# K! `, ^8 [1 F& ]5 {( V# `2 g' B% I) j
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,% H7 `) S0 x( z V* W
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....+ X5 h. G V8 R% Q( k1 D/ k
7 K6 |3 }5 m% mI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. , ]; @0 X" a' nOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. ' x; t2 g l6 UWell, just my personal comments. % t B( V( V: V' v- N5 M5 G1 R& J' B$ I% b6 n
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過... & x' L8 H D0 x+ U4 U. K3 \: O9 ]你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
0 V" o& |( U4 J5 h! z
