娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ? [打印本頁]

作者: shehboy 時間: 2008-2-1 10:44 PM 標題: 問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ?

版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.
+ C0 w7 @5 p4 s/ ^( {6 N9 e
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.2 h0 I4 A, }8 [8 c" i9 ]
( o' z) E. |& f( h8 L
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.

作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM

完全沒看過

作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM

if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man

作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM

抗議！
( c4 t9 F( e6 {8 ~
只許 谷德超 商場買翻版鹹碟8 d8 Z% R( G V- C
不准香港人網絡睇自拍淫照
3 M6 n3 F$ g# }* `
強列要求香港警察不要選擇性執法！7 [" E+ i- J) i, n9 x5 j+ I

[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]

作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM

What is the definition of "原圖" ?

$ Z. r3 p% H7 N/ m
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....

I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....

作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM

I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. - k! d* l. o& K! ?
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.! d' T6 e( h" `2 d
Well, just my personal comments.6 b3 D5 Z0 W& E: B0 A
/ x; l! E q1 x% S: A
Hv a nice day.

作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM

完全沒看過~~~

作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM

未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =

作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM

我完全沒看過...
你信唔信ar?

作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM

暫時都未睇過 ><!

作者: chan525 時間: 2008-2-10 01:39 AM

看過少少......

作者: 大家樂1234 時間: 2008-2-10 02:56 AM

秘密~唔話你知><

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/)