if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 9 |3 s9 `# n/ I( w( S/ l5 g6 y, n; [/ p- P: k% X+ I
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 % b: i. K+ W- E; S: D$ T, C* u不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 7 ^* h4 l. l; V: g- a0 _6 h j $ ~8 x5 a+ i4 _ J9 q1 x" f2 q強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！' n5 G( ^: ]. j+ i, W) n# G& l
; W. m5 O/ c5 v% f1 d# x3 E! ?9 d/ S
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 2 n3 h* L* E; p7 X
: _* f9 \0 p& N; H3 C5 g* |+ G: f9 Z. z( q9 }: f+ i
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,: U" \5 S# a' _, [7 E! W& b! V
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....# R, g1 k7 ?' f1 K5 W
+ M$ O) j2 g: jI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 5 _( ~% z* h0 L0 {: z: hOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.9 U/ a& {0 C$ l# P: f( }$ `+ c' G9 k
Well, just my personal comments.7 \! n7 u0 x4 C
3 _* a! |; m& K' W# }2 h$ u* N: H
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
2 n3 h* L* E; p7 X
