* @ U h: s) T2 B4 o版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.( l* \+ T7 d* ~( [% r. I. H* b3 W
9 R1 E1 q: U" S
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ " u k$ ~* W# h * E+ Y4 c% V+ g只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 5 m7 X. Z7 S: y6 U4 l不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照) I' W. @, f0 Z j" v* z, i
5 }7 M3 L& p& X* |# D( u$ Q
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ' N' C1 i' x, T! x+ |% ?, K) O' T! b$ R, ]% f0 h
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 9 R2 `- N/ {6 j4 h7 e% E & q: W: j# i: W0 J1 A: r" N+ n' { O& X- i
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ) x$ ^, f( s" T# D* s8 T# u/ nand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 7 Q9 [* H+ z' b3 D) {( j( j1 ]6 F% v# `: b, s0 h
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 2 \) l$ x# T5 b7 Y: b" n# M
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 4 g% V3 d' s. p- FWell, just my personal comments.& a6 i3 j( p+ {/ Y
+ s6 n; e7 Y% s" S/ l: [
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
