if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 3 x; }; J& S2 G: g7 T7 z9 m7 x6 N) E4 z) A$ i$ g7 j# c& h
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ) M2 b. k1 p0 ~) L* Q& D不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 2 B2 ?# k$ M# } % s( m! x3 ^, W; E+ @強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ }; C$ `2 E+ s( d! w* x ; O g3 g |; `: K0 p[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? * q1 O5 Y" E$ R5 P m% Q3 `, K
: a q n& m3 Z* l
0 Q0 ?$ C/ J# _( JI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ' e8 g% f& d0 R' j% k9 [and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....5 ?: o/ A7 t1 G& t7 n+ U
, k& E. ~6 Z2 M) P$ ?+ l9 W
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. / a* ~2 z0 N, x4 n: e9 w, XOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. ' i" q1 u' l) D' a$ C. GWell, just my personal comments. ! Q: L+ J$ |# S7 X * c5 B/ X; G" U7 E+ FHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
* q1 O5 Y" E$ R5 P m% Q3 `, K
