
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:32 AM:
! E1 q% P. x& f
oz2, Great Topic
我幫你張呢個主題: (1)Move 去吹水版? & (2) 轉做加分題好冇?
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:) y/ i2 P( `1 C
那麼方案(2),ok?
+ r( y9 I0 m' H- e+ zOriginally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:37 AM:
, q0 O3 p K9 | }+ [1 C$ w5 E4 }
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的,我都會加分
Ok?
) P$ U4 w- s5 N; F


Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2008-2-5 01:59 AM:
你係唔係有D搞亂左啊!
上面發表嘅文章[不好]AND[錯]係有連貫性架!8 l& ^: c& r' S* I! U
你嘅舉例根本就亂晒龍![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:$ h+ t) x; i' r6 C: i6 L M# p" a* v
8 h# ?( ]5 D) \
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11: C* j* K9 S; V6 V* A
3 {6 p! H- j# P( R: Z2 l0 u
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()

Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:27:
6 b, I1 H6 }; G/ d8 f# F
; o1 H: y( a( S$ H9 e% d8 h
應該係:【格硬黎】, 唔係: [格硬理]![]()
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
0 J+ H$ [ b; ~5 e* v: }3 t
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:
' P. f% I) T6 ^
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:
* x, [: y* ^+ |1 Q+ s" T( y( ^2 n
不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
...
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:47 AM:
' D7 Q1 y5 l2 B; d; e6 U: X
放心,我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:) O* m& P2 z: o6 S- g2 L
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......# p( Q3 G4 H; q# L
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...
還望大家見諒 a0 ~2 D3 @6 k. Q" U3 F
Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:5 l) D' ^* K4 F8 A
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...
Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀
但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |