Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.* y2 p) ]. G' a* l8 P0 u

9 `8 m1 N/ m# M9 k" V6 U$ u- F毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.% H4 b2 o) I9 C+ O
% b" ^% @$ p  U/ Y
對打人者只作出警告了事.
/ H$ m- X8 t' [2 ^& N: e6 ^4 C) Q- p0 d
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
; q- c9 J- H7 I
  S4 m$ R( C. v/ M% \4 }3 ?http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
0 R; C( g& A0 t
5 j; B1 ^% W5 c- j. O9 q而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.3 b& A) B) B$ K  X

6 W; u3 A( H, k8 w) L1 v( `# ?2 F3 e請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
, R/ q  x; G# p  Y
% p1 ]) D5 Q& c. F& M
+ A6 [& H3 w: |" k- \9 m& c- z3 S1 ~
個人認為.....
8 l1 f4 @- K* a4 h; y: h0 R/ s. x6 [$ h- F
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)2 N3 r! R3 M- Q% k0 T6 K
; \- i  v5 M* d% P" I
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
/ D, R  K  c. n- J) \
; D; O9 ?; ~- {. {- b( b, k8 K3 e
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9 T- h; h4 j! X0 u* L
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
5 i' p: Q: K9 bare you the witness of the incident?0 K; {$ n, a4 R# E$ L. F( {8 B
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..% W8 [. U' C1 G3 s; R
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".  [; F1 ]: Y) o8 s
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:* x1 y; m  E5 o2 y# F0 B9 v
have u studied law or anything rela...
1 ^& G: _3 ?/ \0 L! P* n* j1 ]( e! ]) C
黑字 : 係轉貼
' Z3 E/ ~: N5 l4 e) d- s$ X6 r- {1 d! c5 a* r5 s
紅字 : 個人感想
" H3 ]$ i& u/ q3 T3 V; \8 v( K
; U- \- c" C6 O# A1 lok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval
' y5 j, p4 l; J; H" e- |' tit's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.3 x4 G7 @8 u$ @! W) N$ z
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
' E  O( ?3 T% r% g' ]0 A2 ^just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
/ x( W- P# W3 ?! b9 Kgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
3 d! v: _' C3 C. j+ b- b該警員明顯地想息事寧人...* E3 S) G6 y: {$ J" }( g# |2 R
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得1 M! g% J) {3 R
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間3 V; u+ `3 i* C, E* J% X* f
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
' R1 {# I* q1 g5 P' _# t我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事$ b- w- h2 b5 `6 n4 U) {8 T4 z; t
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當# L- {8 _9 y" z8 ?
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
# \! k! q# ~6 A8 l! L由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0