Board logo

標題: 原來銅頭像那麼值錢, 建議亦將維園英女王像的頭拍賣 [打印本頁]
作者: bwk0317    時間: 2009-2-26 12:30 AM     標題: 原來銅頭像那麼值錢, 建議亦將維園英女王像的頭拍賣

1860 年英法聯軍當年入侵中國, 搶劫得來的圓明公園12生肖鼠首和兔首銅像，輾轉流落到已故時裝設計師聖羅蘭（Yves Saint Laurent）手上。他的同性伴侶貝爾熱（ Pierre Berge ）決定拿出來拍賣。* l' i7 S( z& C+ |% @# E, x( U
7 |# t% @# I; F# s* S
這促使中國的「追索圓明園流失文物律師團」委託「歐洲保護中華藝術聯合會」，向巴黎法庭申請禁制拍賣。 結果當然輸了更加要向法國法庭支付罰款，真 on9。 3 s1 o( H8 j0 H6 g7 P' M

, K" `2 R$ l# a! |8 A9 X原來公園銅頭像那麼值錢, 建議香港政府將現時維園裡英國人最尊敬的'英女王'銅像的「頭」亦切下來拍賣, 增加財政收益 。
2 `$ F+ A3 T3 ^: z1 ]7 l/ v# r! m
http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/apple/20090225/small/25wh12pnew.jpg- R: b' G+ F8 j" i, W8 M5 k
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/Victoria_Park.JPG/250px-Victoria_Park.JPG" K) z( O$ z( @3 R6 J- O! u* {, S
4 I! T+ W& [! F$ z7 H. A
[ 本帖最後由 bwk0317 於 2009-2-26 01:00 AM 編輯 ]
作者: dawander3r    時間: 2009-2-26 01:49 AM

haha....good point( @8 J# s0 [8 V6 _# Q* z
but soon, i m sure this status will be gone for a specific reason
& H5 F% l7 c, K& a. h# p' x
8 T: q+ p) I# m/ |2 U0 |5 shonestly these status r nothing special in my perspective( |- a. C$ Z4 a5 j
- U0 F2 y8 k. A9 E7 k
1) they r recent creations, how many years is that? 150-200?
" c) ~0 |& P: o! X/ k( \2) since they r recent creations, i don't see much valuable skills or knowledge applied on these creations+ g+ ~$ R% {: }0 f
3) again, as 2) mentioned, it seems like a mixture of Chinese and Western art which doesn't really represent Chinese arts' K7 w7 m: u4 W4 D4 P
4) they r just copper from recent periods1 d4 T9 m" B4 S8 ^$ O0 ~. |/ F; L

; ]% }, i1 o0 cjust like the porkchops we dont like, however, they do like them very much, otherwise who will take Yan Yee as gf# o* a. p9 V! a6 d. U
i wouldn't spend so much money to get them back which is definitely falling into their traps of making money as they know u wanna get them back for dignity
# ~3 G, I8 X8 j/ |0 v
! `' w: R; F: i/ J: h4 s9 V/ S  K1 olaw is always so stupid
' E5 `$ @0 o- K: {+ u; W8 T' ]apparently there r lots of evidences suggesting it's property of Chinese even though they r not strong proofs
. `8 f" w* o& k% L. |) Ehowever, the current owner also can't even claim they r the legal owner n acquired them in a legal way either, which is just same as the Chinese cannot submit the same documents as well, how can they have the right to sell the status to public in the auction. y- B( P$ M! K6 p

! `% t. ?9 N- Z# D: p: ~law never protects the right parties in any way0 s  ~9 u: p4 L: p
sigh.../ j$ ^2 L/ j9 Q1 S  H6 h! [

1 G: k4 |. b/ d4 U6 o, g0 v: {[ 本帖最後由 dawander3r 於 2009-2-26 02:05 AM 編輯 ]
作者: skyhookii    時間: 2009-2-26 05:58 AM

Well, the way I look at it, the French should just tell the Chinese to make fake ones for themselves. Surely the Chinese won't mind, seeing as they already have so much fake stuff in China. And the Copper Heads aren't even the current PRC's Government anyway. The current PRC Government didn't even exist back then.
作者: pkyon    時間: 2009-2-26 03:49 PM

哈哈....打仗都似...到時歷使多左個''歸''頭戰爭...3 B6 L& t+ }( v" h
=================
& @) P: g% Y9 q$ B; g: e其實點解中國唔去投返返來
5 c- O! U; Y# o5 e6 e8 d5 l- O
# c1 T8 w  O3 g[ 本帖最後由 pkyon 於 2009-2-26 03:51 PM 編輯 ]
作者: benny1219    時間: 2009-2-26 04:31 PM

原帖由 pkyon 於 2009-2-26 03:49 PM 發表 http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif8 n9 @4 A, i5 B  U
哈哈....打仗都似...到時歷使多左個''歸''頭戰爭...
  j  u5 l: ?5 l& [, L3 u=================5 g2 i4 s, ~2 j1 o
其實點解中國唔去投返返來
; O0 R! n" I$ b' V' L4 Z$ D  L7 k, `4 B6 t
中國咁多財物流失世界各地 怎可能全部用錢買返黎   金山銀礦都搞唔掂* X9 [  ], s; v" [

/ W$ {# W) R8 ]+ x
" I0 V2 f( S8 E9 K5 N/ p8 V同埋明明係自已 用錢買番自已的東西簡值係一種侮辱
作者: dave14    時間: 2009-2-26 05:40 PM

原帖由 benny1219 於 2009-2-26 04:31 PM 發表 http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
! x3 ]& t, ^3 Z6 Q, i" y0 N7 y: F, f$ u3 Q0 N
9 n  G; n5 P4 h8 r6 M8 ~
中國咁多財物流失世界各地 怎可能全部用錢買返黎   金山銀礦都搞唔掂( y0 F0 T6 r' ^9 u0 f

9 v# V; ]( {) S# c
6 J9 v6 q1 r9 B& N同埋明明係自已 用錢買番自已的東西簡值係一種侮辱
, U5 R) F2 \$ D) j
$ A! C1 K6 W7 ?& p搵人"拎"番黎 - x' L  U/ }8 c; t/ k) g) K( T
d野原本我地既.."拎"番黎之ma...  d' _$ }* L% p
人地吹咩!!
作者: 人狼王子    時間: 2009-2-27 01:06 AM

好提議!!!
8 E% Q8 f! m4 l9 {; E# f人哋黎中國搶野,都可以大大聲拎出黎拍賣...仲要干預埋中國既政策先話"送"番俾中國,咩道理 ) J$ e* S" L. j! a; w- M
英女皇像係英國俾香港,咁就拎埋出黎一齊拍賣下!!!% Z9 J& ~$ g$ F; W" S& q; q, [
人哋以"中國圓明園文物"既名義,我哋未用番"香港回歸前英女皇頭像"
( i) C6 ?. {: O: [; Y
作者: hamsubboy    時間: 2009-2-27 01:19 AM

樓主歷年來開的話題中, 這個topic是最搞笑和最不令人反感的一個!
作者: skyhookii    時間: 2009-3-1 11:58 PM

Think of it this way. The current PRC Government took over from the Tsing Dynasty just because they wanted the assets of the Imperial Family back then. The statue doesn't even belong to the PRC Government. If it has to be returned to somebody, it would be the descendants of Pui Yee. And, if the PRC Government can just take it back, then the British Museum would have to return all its exhibits to Greece, Italy, Egypt etc and the world would be chaotic.



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0