Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!' B1 X- d0 U' U: u& V2 B
佢都係方便各網友啫!
* e& P1 y3 s5 F# @之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
; q" J# b5 Z7 A, z& f9 b告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!$ d6 c/ y3 A, i( M# y: w  b
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!9 j3 m" k! F" F! C  V
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
# h! ^/ U, `  O* H純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
0 z$ }: @' @  e, J/ h: [4 @
6 g& w; z3 _7 ^* G9 S- m5 U[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
7 F+ s' A: \& O7 hhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
4 S/ ^6 \: S- Y' d5 i: r# |: Y+ F" d
) i) i7 w) s. b( [# Q[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
+ r8 Q5 R/ Z0 x+ B根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
# y. r8 u& N% i% y1 S  i2 e"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
5 X: ~( \7 b1 [% C講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!* V4 \0 a$ W  J2 [
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
$ p: o3 T' G6 s: L根本就荒天下之大謬!4 b& B1 l5 {: z+ {
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!* m" E5 R/ Y( j& y1 b; ~6 y0 r* @
根本就荒天下之大謬!$ d* g1 m7 b0 X! r8 N" o; y  U6 F
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
2 ?8 E: I+ u2 E  [8 f: k$ O9 s+ _, x# U( Y& O7 g
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
6 p$ q8 T8 E; @' g9 c0 d, y  W7 f( k- K" T$ R
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.0 a7 ~1 U- R$ D/ O8 S' C- r

' o' g, r; R  x- [' k+ ?沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下." P! ^- ^2 e1 m6 f( }

  G/ k, q  X4 N6 D6 \還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
# [8 z# c" n3 F3 W9 M' r9 ~) b要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人- h+ D% P, B) z
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:6 E8 n$ _4 D( M7 m  G
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 O5 w/ r; j$ Xvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
( C0 R8 j7 T$ u) f* P7 r( X! ~然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!) O6 z" O" Z5 B+ O$ }) Y) D3 P
既牟利又侵權!) o) {& u5 Y) |2 u
但亦大行其道.....; w: L1 x( n; u% O8 ~; [
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......7 R5 b+ ?; |% Y8 h1 c
只係香港政府係多重標準!7 e4 Z) \/ W' D6 J+ `
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
2 g& v  V: S) q, L) \4 T+ ~' g難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....9 k: x: M( i$ {3 {7 a
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
; E' r' ^9 }2 s0 s1 }+ c但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
" O  r4 P$ @* V, A. ?) |大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- w3 j, y. g6 M2 j
I agree you points that it could be illegal
/ m0 A5 Q. k: H; P9 ^4 hbut that is still a "gray area"
1 r; r) H, [+ _8 Y* o$ a- J, Bwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
& o$ j5 ~( ]" u9 X6 ?1 L0 j' w; x8 s
anyway, I want to say that is
# }; T# l0 q. k! {! \who is supposed to be protected by laws
0 o$ |5 {. Z; D" B7 g4 h! e/ Fcreators?$ j4 l; ?5 S% _
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market' t2 f) F$ F% G; Z( i/ G1 ~5 v: ~* c
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ B( I7 K# n, [# b! d0 K$ L
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# b  t! b0 B; {1 j" X3 s7 J
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
8 t1 a. n$ ?5 u+ B8 s* h其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 f4 O. ^1 q" ?- s我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
" v5 w. K; [& d. J/ v! i# {. [3 r( B* i% h: C  W* e; |
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, `+ w( w/ D) U! ?. J8 ?
唔係喎!( M8 s/ y3 d5 S$ l( Q+ f! z, @
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
/ N6 i- K# p! f1 c3 G6 c2 Q/ h* O我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!7 l" g: a% i) A: `. I% t
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!. @! ?0 I7 j* X9 z
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
  |  Z5 F  A- N/ Q一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
' [! k: j6 k/ A: E; B2 _+ Wdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......% i* ~) v! V$ T
if so bad, dun download la, right?& e4 P5 O8 i& v8 i) u/ f
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^, p8 U) c7 ]' n
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
1 {( d' P# @' @# Qno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la6 x* I  X. m4 B" ]1 s
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society# H* h; ~* M5 U; @
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
3 k& `  ]( K9 P% r: @$ `8 m4 bwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% R% r$ I9 x- ]# w8 N$ w3 X4 i
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
/ R- O, E/ P+ J, J: }6 M; @) e佢又唔係殺人放火~~~6 K: V; ^9 Y" E/ d
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
  k# H3 Y; Z$ y5 Z6 T& u錢就一定罰- _. c, q; V# ?+ M
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,5 a$ N! Q7 E- D" _: t; |& Y
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?% d9 o8 Y: E) n7 n2 ^% @/ O3 t% f
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
4 ^9 L& H5 z! L9 Y7 A到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:' K# {( r, e& Y& h
告得入我切!!!
3 O: ^3 B- y& y, i/ s" A# l1 ^( V我當初都估告唔入,( i& x- `+ ^: r" ^
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀," j5 m5 }1 T0 H, n- x3 x, h
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
/ u# T. K, F- c我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
4 o9 B  z5 G/ j/ m. r美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
8 }) u0 z9 ^$ ], P  U, E$ O因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0