Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
0 C) O  _$ a" u( N4 h5 H* s佢都係方便各網友啫!/ f# s- T" O. H4 B& v' m. W% {
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.: z  l  r, K: d/ Z$ c+ C2 h
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!/ W! M/ D8 B/ T2 ]
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!$ f( a: |- _$ j2 ^! ~
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
5 k2 m, z' C' y: c) e: T純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
$ i7 Q# `" y, @* d' T! M% k. n, l
( u; T9 _1 I8 U: c[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
: m- _3 e5 I1 a. M) V$ n& ghttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
5 S* g3 W. Z  G0 _; o
7 I& M6 x1 E" b! |  M[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
5 i; m8 [- E8 f* ~3 g- u8 E( f8 T根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?7 D0 l& S3 F6 u# ?
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
* E! z1 z( y! `2 Z講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
3 L8 n& B6 u2 w香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
1 M. t5 _8 D2 {, V9 m3 M9 o7 y根本就荒天下之大謬!+ D' h$ I9 L0 i& [8 d8 l0 d
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!- Y5 V" h- m+ l. }9 s4 r
根本就荒天下之大謬!! \( o) y2 Z8 J4 ~$ A2 G3 P
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.& ^' \; K& \! [% A6 V

- x; m  V8 v! g佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
, i+ s5 X6 ?; D; J. S' ?" A0 ?) j+ H; A* N
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.- ?# R, ~  j) C5 [1 g0 \8 R# I2 S
8 W" p1 Z8 U* @2 Q! O$ e
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
$ f0 _0 l) Y* c! B. y  I8 m6 l+ ?, @5 ^1 a2 e
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
5 q% t4 @6 P+ e要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
; _  N6 s" i9 j, {4 G3 W0 H罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
; b! ^3 ?& A3 E6 G大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ p2 l% l! f2 A# A( v$ W
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! , M$ [% h# E6 R$ O! s0 t3 e
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
, R- S7 q) _4 l6 h  M8 E! o既牟利又侵權!, q6 w* [+ x. s" V
但亦大行其道.....) j0 Q6 v, @) [: d3 x' U: T
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......7 k% d& H0 z/ |( @; i- c' W
只係香港政府係多重標準!
( N3 Y1 d/ g4 N: q9 F' T同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
+ S2 u- U1 F  b$ n難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
& B/ P7 P" ?/ L7 F* n所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)% @* S# _9 k; p4 H
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:5 x7 G/ z/ d: G: H
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
0 ]& w# T) v! ?- b
I agree you points that it could be illegal- X$ b3 m0 P: E2 Q
but that is still a "gray area"5 a5 X4 G5 z( x2 [
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
) k: Q. n, \6 ^% C
( J: i' v5 [$ p9 janyway, I want to say that is
7 S7 U8 h; c# y+ j4 D3 Z4 n. xwho is supposed to be protected by laws
: o; Z; N8 S$ u! h7 j* \creators?. T$ r8 L2 t6 @; ~4 t
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market; ~& w2 D& z) j
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
  K8 K9 B# W# W* ~; W' q! n* \when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those: I- b) B6 l6 }" f4 Q5 Q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
! c3 j) X, }3 b' G6 u" N  q+ q其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 }6 ^4 p1 L8 d: e. {, q6 _- S# H我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:, D5 W2 ?9 Z1 }1 Z$ N6 R$ S
1 R# g' @; T/ n; W2 T, I
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
/ h8 [- u$ i5 J8 u( L$ s唔係喎!: H, P4 r/ e; R" A% h0 A
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
% X0 f) h9 ?+ b7 |' I+ k6 I+ ?我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
! h& ?" s: r2 P7 |0 G8 Q  R3 |佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!( I5 T8 O8 ?+ {6 V$ m
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事5 ~" a6 A3 [. ~7 ^
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!. y0 T- c, I* p; h* w8 i
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......7 V# z( \! v1 h/ j5 s
if so bad, dun download la, right?
3 p; K4 M0 |# Pi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
$ M+ I7 W3 O  w2 N& |' h( Abut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
4 C$ c8 D- W8 M- nno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la- O( X! b, N/ a; T* w6 S: L
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society( R- Z1 L: ]( Z8 k( n
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
8 d7 C- R0 t7 h8 s6 X2 c* @+ o7 S! swhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
5 u' L6 j, ]8 J  A3 I6 `so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
% D$ G4 ^8 C% P# I佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 i7 @4 @: @5 W6 ?  y8 V2 k政府想比下馬威0的人~~
, e8 Z, z( L' {) [錢就一定罰7 d* x7 l4 p# g  V
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,$ v; h" }  M7 q+ R
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 d1 \' ~8 A$ J) b' v1 ?2 a0 G0 F佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
' J/ B2 F5 a) z( u! i; U' e# r到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
& A+ T  |0 A3 e6 U* }7 ]告得入我切!!!
% _, K  j4 ~# f  O
我當初都估告唔入,) X6 D) \( d! O! @2 V, C
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀," h8 v9 j; s% h; u  o
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇* \2 d1 Y# }: b* b" K$ x
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:2 f9 |/ F: U) I5 U% b* C( R9 u
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
; O0 V4 w8 v  R% N2 a: }8 p
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0