Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!) ^4 s& g& |/ o/ O: A2 c  N* _$ a
佢都係方便各網友啫!
3 k* ~% F. e3 r* E1 J4 G/ r之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
9 v5 {3 B7 f- E: d告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
6 v3 b, [2 I; k: ]2 m. K6 Q( o我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!) j/ u2 ?( Y  Y. W* F
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
% U; |# O- S0 Q; w純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
, m6 o0 ?* W% A- j- {) d$ `* s. r5 s2 ]' ^9 ]9 |/ W1 ^
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 # p) T6 j9 N1 ^6 F% e
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif( L5 t8 b8 ]: A" ^& g
5 K0 \1 Q  Y0 j, J7 f
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!$ ?) O- T) @9 `0 D; D
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?9 ~; v6 ^, |- \6 A
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
3 E7 w/ U: W2 f; \9 b) i講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!2 ]: @' s$ ]1 Q; s! t
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
7 W  T; v1 C% h) e2 t根本就荒天下之大謬!
0 B4 T* `' ^: R: _! R不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
3 t7 P6 d7 d; o! Q: L2 W9 K根本就荒天下之大謬!$ v) P# g2 [+ k4 d2 d! ~
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.: F0 I$ R- G/ O. T/ Y! B

. C7 b, I# b7 M( w# ~佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.0 L) N& k- V' n0 s, K3 ]
  W2 ^2 \: f0 h2 y# C' M
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.9 ~# v! {! v+ Z0 d3 B" |2 m
- r; c5 M: ?4 o5 G: `% m' y; x
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
$ U1 ~/ [8 }6 q  E
3 c3 }; `4 |/ Q8 a, o還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多; V+ Y# {: E4 m; B% O/ M6 k
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人9 M! f# ^5 V! y+ }
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
0 S+ O% W) @, {1 d大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# d8 z  N, k4 y+ n" Gvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 3 ^1 b* P: v5 V3 T6 Z% R
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!5 C: {( D$ q4 }
既牟利又侵權!
0 {( }- V/ t& o8 [但亦大行其道.....1 Z- e8 T6 L: l/ t0 ~# y
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
5 _+ J  C$ @. l7 A只係香港政府係多重標準!; g$ {/ T4 u' d" m$ Q
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
+ s% i  F( \1 `難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
6 [  g' Z2 C4 B# C1 I$ X所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
& }2 H, i, `2 z/ c, H# W: L: G; k但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:( X6 W/ S( T2 a1 J; P; F) d" U
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 F1 N" w$ _) @% g0 w7 s3 K
I agree you points that it could be illegal
4 @( E' @) V0 W3 jbut that is still a "gray area"
9 A% F8 v' i' o6 Iwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair, B& }/ j! X. P! o  B8 S' O0 ?

& B! V; K# i; e3 ~4 N& f. B: B' Eanyway, I want to say that is" z. y, R  C9 H; G0 v3 s
who is supposed to be protected by laws# T! Z) K6 n; Z3 I1 R/ _9 Z) X( J
creators?
  q# t; ~7 I5 D; Sbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
* y& {3 ^0 K9 p0 ilet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.# f# M4 z4 Z' r) j* b/ N$ t5 S
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
8 z. n, Q0 S; T8 ?2 J2 O9 qWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:- R& p2 V/ P+ w/ E' h& g4 F
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' J$ T- d- A9 r; k7 }. U+ l
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:5 B7 O& W0 N. P8 N& S$ H
, U5 q6 X; v. Z$ H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
1 m1 y; `% l& m唔係喎!0 Z; m2 W3 f0 E; u" r0 Q+ B
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
. e8 e% t9 [; k0 A3 Z8 ^( j我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
) x+ ^, ~  k  J- h# ]3 R2 |佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!8 U; C: Z" t8 Y! u
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事# O7 }) ^2 ]7 G- G- G$ W" A) C
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
) G) R+ Q# S3 X8 Pdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......., ?9 s. Z, M9 l" x$ D, w
if so bad, dun download la, right?
8 b6 C5 g8 X% d: d, c3 Y" Ii am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
& ]0 `8 v- m. _& K9 hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ }. Y$ A: W9 x5 h% @2 B/ z& n
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
7 V" ^" _2 K# m$ fso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
- H; t( O6 c5 n+ t& G* V. Tusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........., Q: y# `" Q7 a
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!- V* J% F& X1 j
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!7 [% ?' N- i- f5 i' t) }
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~4 r8 h0 g' l% S* w$ n- y
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& Z2 u) U+ q' B) \錢就一定罰5 d6 M" r2 T' F* Z* E% y7 C
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,% m" @) b3 @! `
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
; d0 _+ d0 O- n. Q2 Y" Z+ J; A/ n1 Z佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  D: Q( f. z+ D7 \% e
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:6 j# P- y4 A* X% N; p5 K
告得入我切!!!
- p1 P: c; n3 q/ [. O; l4 C我當初都估告唔入,9 T( {8 v" A/ g; r, ^3 ~
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
9 S2 B7 q- k# {5 |+ J真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇  E9 v+ M2 m+ U1 ~
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
5 R. @6 A* v/ m: T! `) S) u0 J, R美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
  a- Y) t" W8 w1 |$ a因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0