Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
/ I+ M: J( C4 B  w/ D" V: h佢都係方便各網友啫!  |9 Y: h% K1 {6 }: P/ x
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
8 O& ^8 n  K4 i# D告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
0 D/ t% M9 a8 |0 a; B我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!# B: b1 @5 Z3 y, B9 l
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!# n, Q- `1 k( s* F! l
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
% @: B1 S, ]& U) E3 X5 ]
7 A9 ]* B) g7 |: G; p- v  h[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 ; }5 d* t8 L& H* N2 ~6 W0 @
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
( y5 N* Z# m  q" U4 z, C2 l! q# e( }2 k) O$ ^- ?4 j! w0 o7 \/ @
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
+ L- P& q/ n# B) i# O0 x8 _3 X根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
1 R. L( y! }3 [- l, h* d' [! A"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!$ {- q% m; w, ?: @  m
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!4 [8 r- a& w$ `# {4 R3 @
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!( J! Q% }: [5 b! ~" f
根本就荒天下之大謬!3 b& |' c- C- }" `
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
; d1 z6 n  D4 T: v根本就荒天下之大謬!2 {* y( `8 i% X7 ^
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
( K( {& M% B. L: k" `$ V* v, D8 d1 d8 Z! j4 @1 k
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
+ T2 P1 b+ D$ e0 z. ]+ g4 o( w7 e- Z& N  B
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了./ x7 ~5 r7 `& N9 F5 k. u

! U* Z5 x0 @3 A沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下., v% X' t% s. ]" a$ l
# E5 V# [' R* V# ~
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多1 w5 i  f- R$ t3 q0 Y# R; t0 m" J- A
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
2 `: N1 r$ l( q# X# E罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: ^' {  b& D' J" R* c  m7 [3 ~大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 g. v: A  |; E* d/ Cvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! ' z8 t; h8 Z$ [  i
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!* d( {( M' [' g4 h
既牟利又侵權!
' }1 Y/ f+ ^7 x* b7 S但亦大行其道.....0 d, y  |) y3 R% u
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
2 B7 a7 P/ B- v" ~; C) b: _% C只係香港政府係多重標準!
& f& q+ _. _" M; n同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!+ x: Y8 H1 ]# O! I5 H# W8 u$ [
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....! w7 o! R. \5 q* ^+ ?7 X# j
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
+ w$ ]5 L) [! p但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ v- w1 @# Q$ t6 \: h/ Q大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 |1 l! {8 \' d0 R6 ^I agree you points that it could be illegal8 p+ y& L, C$ @8 E) I; J8 F
but that is still a "gray area"- n( k0 l6 I0 P% d( w; U
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair$ u- Q/ x# |( z/ g% t
) c9 S5 a4 ?( u/ @" T
anyway, I want to say that is
# I( N; r2 f3 k4 K5 Bwho is supposed to be protected by laws
: Q+ h. v# s- U% P# jcreators?2 S& l5 r; e& K/ n( d$ K
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
) S  x( m8 |8 |& xlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.6 ?3 z7 d9 d6 h' U7 z
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
7 \7 n2 v4 a0 z  s7 EWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
5 x: ?, B5 j4 |2 q其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
8 N5 Z* ~  \5 \6 D( ]1 ^+ ]我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' A6 n6 {0 r3 ?8 n' P( `9 P5 f, f. a! L* ?$ g' z
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
3 N5 P) i# I' a$ J! l1 Z2 c1 s
唔係喎!9 f; b$ n/ G9 [/ Z/ D/ H3 p
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!4 j% j6 s9 g. I; G$ g6 ?9 h
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!& C+ \8 {, s6 W# s$ x7 }" ?- e
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, j, o. U5 L: e% W' t: l
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事  I% p: h- u, J
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
: |: U& I2 i8 `6 @1 o+ _$ `, j+ Vdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
/ R" Z7 [8 N0 g* Tif so bad, dun download la, right?3 j+ h/ m) ?" R( \, b
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
; {1 y4 R# I! W: ^# k8 K' u" Vbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
/ M4 ?' r& _  W0 H! X5 i% w# Yno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
* c1 u! T! c6 J0 o+ [so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society7 j. m+ N% R/ M$ a! `: J
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
0 ~; v' G7 e' q* awhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!! N0 ~; F! v2 S! d
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
# t2 I. H& _! ]6 }  Q9 e) i佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
. D, I/ G: M) y8 b/ h政府想比下馬威0的人~~
, d5 w. S$ K. M# S9 o錢就一定罰
$ A7 {' [" G+ A$ [# ^! j3 H未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
, A4 b5 b/ I& u/ l/ A唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?: z. L) _4 w, ]" T+ P& Z8 |
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?, M& t4 @. F: w
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
4 A: a5 g: M+ C: d告得入我切!!!
9 A1 S% q9 L) a  z) S  P$ ^) U我當初都估告唔入," F! X& t" B4 v  V1 l4 c- O! w. e
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
+ c! N% m* z- n, ^) G真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇2 Q2 W; |' H2 V4 z9 g
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:' a& i9 x0 I; Y$ c' `/ @+ q
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
, W4 @9 n4 F/ q( F. l( \* M, ^
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0