Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!  J8 v* ~- r3 }5 @% i- T3 H
佢都係方便各網友啫!
; `! l: E- G/ j1 z之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
7 ]4 }8 p( {; J3 T告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!) c, q1 t2 w3 `$ B
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
# Y3 W8 u+ r/ r/ l* |" X班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
! P/ i! H0 s( P5 U( B5 X) k純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
: r1 l( S/ b- J# _# e, G
/ N" P8 |/ z1 B1 L[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
, z( H4 S* C9 n, A2 s8 ~. Vhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
0 |# x; M+ I  p  H5 H' C! c" A' I; p, k# T
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
+ J' j2 D, ^/ g根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
7 x6 q: u/ l* V3 _; F# }"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!# r: G% }# ?) D: S; ~' I
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
7 i% H4 h% `2 g5 c2 @) ~# U香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!1 c% @  Q6 V. {5 ]# O0 N% C* p
根本就荒天下之大謬!6 v9 y7 ?1 X3 ]; i: ?, O% y
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
5 h: u% W# B7 U; d0 O根本就荒天下之大謬!) m  ^( M8 v% T% n0 t2 \/ W
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.1 r% D% K" V: e- d% m

8 n" t7 W" e8 J) X: u佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.; {0 k) L  {; J) h, t' C4 n

, Z- p( ~6 Y8 d( a; E6 U/ `& I現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
5 b- D& i! {. q* E4 ^# G% p4 P, [: s" C4 K5 `. v' Z7 Z
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.) g: o& c' D4 Y+ p, F

2 A0 }, v. G5 W3 e0 w還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
! K9 v* i& W! g8 A  N要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人4 K! i/ _/ h( L8 q3 W, F  l
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
: W/ H7 R3 A: z; K. x" j大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; j( P+ j; S+ O: L1 \, ?vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
7 L: d5 J+ R7 x" ]8 }7 y6 s然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
2 x: H+ ?( l3 K4 v1 X6 z既牟利又侵權!
: `0 ?& y* a, Q6 h4 ?但亦大行其道.....
- R% a8 k. v5 P3 p: B4 P唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......: Q3 U# k4 J5 `1 G+ B3 c4 S1 S
只係香港政府係多重標準!
+ K. _, X% }( O! S5 o同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!. ?* d: J. m9 S$ x& ~+ h+ A
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
' t" K! O4 M, w- U! ?6 x所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
* K( q- w8 A5 l6 N/ _0 [' @5 C$ h但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:( I: {* |2 L/ Q9 n
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
1 v- G+ g9 \0 F5 h1 q3 \I agree you points that it could be illegal7 h2 ?/ e) N7 J, I( X% P- [
but that is still a "gray area"
; l' r  U& o* Dwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair$ h" ?" S1 U3 @' L9 Q" v+ L3 T1 J
0 |& f$ U* F% H4 ]" t* D
anyway, I want to say that is
" y1 E7 v0 ]* ~who is supposed to be protected by laws& K" f( h: l8 m/ @. l0 W- c- }
creators?9 U5 V6 @6 E+ N7 Q& N2 m/ m
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
" H) M0 P( h! q# }let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.4 q% q: M9 \" E, S+ g4 {
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
. K. j$ O6 O  s3 R4 E( C! e+ HWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:8 g& }# j2 Y8 A# \2 k% S
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
, o5 |1 k; B; \我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
" R% F. E7 v* g6 f0 Z. Z1 N2 ~5 B
& |" o' n# U; c. A我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! q6 k9 o7 N. X" p& v6 F5 U# l  T8 N1 Z唔係喎!) ^$ `% L- N( h- i7 g6 I- V" N6 R2 Y
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
! E4 e3 k- N- C! |, N6 w& y) m我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!4 `5 I- u. K$ @  ?" m
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
  Y' k! J- V  [/ ?8 E就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
* n# h3 A1 f  l4 H, V4 P一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
; Q4 G/ a: H6 Odun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
( F' k# Y9 n% gif so bad, dun download la, right?
+ q3 v8 b& @( o7 L/ {4 _% xi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^9 H) p. h2 h9 h* A& W! @
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct( y' K' J' l4 p" S. R
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
- e  P( G6 b. Uso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society' x; {9 s; M# ^, k8 s1 n
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
  g2 w: V: {8 F  {why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!- S: Z# G! h  a2 z7 e6 y# X
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!& J( K7 `6 j7 C6 v! c
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~, ]/ a# |9 L/ s5 ^/ U: j
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
$ F, x/ A) w, D! d6 [0 }' {錢就一定罰- k; e, u! I5 W% _* z
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
2 W0 t2 w- U0 R$ T2 S! J- k唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?4 `' L: E7 S2 e( B! z( y7 n  u. v
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?$ i7 T) }- T, ~; p
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
2 }  _, o3 x- N告得入我切!!!
4 ^7 Z1 ~& B7 _, e3 V
我當初都估告唔入,' N% o! ]3 y9 a! O- `; q9 L
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
5 u, ~0 L( S8 C0 ~% K/ L真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇: A! V2 Y$ {, w: N
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:7 x3 y! s/ h. J* F% v  a
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
- S$ \3 Q, m$ O: }. t- u因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0