Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
  W# g  l3 z! r. j- q4 g9 v: N佢都係方便各網友啫!% M6 A! R* z$ `" F* J7 G
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.# y+ w1 C3 J1 k; w. ^4 U" k6 q
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!  r: C" @. G8 M, m8 K- X
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
9 t- R' K; S% f# \( |班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!: m1 J" ^: f: |: i. G$ v$ X- R
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!8 p6 E, b7 }3 s2 P+ c! c9 }* f
% F6 e* X" q. @6 A. ]
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
+ D) N: Z; Z/ p: xhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif2 \5 y; h! |- N  S# z" u+ M% r! B# d
( m4 T! @9 u5 K$ J
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
; W  {$ ^2 X% K1 n0 k% }! X根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?8 j/ V, l" u& ^5 x0 Z& i
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
  d/ e9 B/ o: Z: ^% [* R& h  @2 }講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!1 l. G# t3 L+ @" L( b) J' z9 V
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!2 [9 m( j  X# O8 `
根本就荒天下之大謬!
' S' h! f5 |0 ^7 h; b1 A不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
1 h  Q; l* r4 x根本就荒天下之大謬!
( B( [7 k: @4 t' c% {/ I3 D/ d# P不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
% ^  L4 W/ k* D9 G2 w) \: z% T1 J" r+ m! _& `
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
0 k; [( a  y% t1 I  W/ o
7 i: ^8 X. [$ x0 p/ E4 E現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
6 v/ Q  _3 |( a6 p0 a8 `; Y4 R% t- q: J* {! @7 t3 R
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
  [( V( z8 j7 y% j7 f0 f, G( U, N5 ~1 V7 T* T9 K/ v, J( b
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
! a* {9 k# N& S* V$ F* \要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
9 f3 W' ]. C2 w4 E罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 f# m( e& i( `% t" R  M: N大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" e. |9 L" @6 b2 }vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! & y8 O5 n. x8 Y3 l( ~' \/ u/ c6 R# {8 H
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
) V6 }$ T# E, {既牟利又侵權!
2 ?# L5 \2 i5 d5 p7 L6 p% V& P但亦大行其道.....
8 \6 ?' q8 ^6 u' r. D唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......0 N( f" g* E4 z4 @: H# ]
只係香港政府係多重標準!% D4 k/ @4 h: T. q# u7 c' N
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!- i. l$ b6 M+ F3 w$ _0 V
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....# \" e# R* s% _* o5 L/ J3 A
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
$ r% B* n+ Y. R8 ~/ A3 y+ i. C2 S+ {; n但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ H$ A: T' O7 d3 h& [5 M1 g大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 l3 [( ]4 |; p, L0 j7 o2 H. jI agree you points that it could be illegal" H6 |( j+ ^7 W8 p( Y
but that is still a "gray area"
$ u3 G5 ]4 o% Y: twhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair1 m% b2 |9 m% x3 z/ C6 z; Q: j8 r
& H  g/ ^4 p' z: M
anyway, I want to say that is$ @8 O+ K0 Q5 q; b. f( P
who is supposed to be protected by laws
& J% d7 q7 p4 k# {9 Wcreators?
& U0 l+ t/ i8 M. O' a" B9 v  B$ ubut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market8 y4 {. F, E) L$ ?0 {1 @. B  A, S
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
6 |8 @  E: x9 D9 S- L( Fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
; a  u* H2 s' @/ P7 R3 G2 K8 a8 RWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 m2 V; g( y: f! l* o) T5 h  z( ^  u其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
! E1 T+ e0 _+ Q我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" H1 S) o) O5 x6 h1 z) o- `: S

1 i1 P: W- f* o: K我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 ~/ \6 M- u- @0 {9 C
唔係喎!
8 O; G3 Y+ ]2 S, }5 T2 x古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& l2 \6 A- D, n# R. H0 S6 m我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
9 q* e: k% o" r9 u佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
8 Y" N( E$ ~; J" ^" c% |# U就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事* i$ k# r" B* {$ n8 t
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!) a2 j5 J; b$ U
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
4 h" Q! [1 [, J7 r" A7 r2 {) i) jif so bad, dun download la, right?
( Z8 P) P% r) v9 ji am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- H. C) E, ]5 Z7 a
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
+ Y- q9 J- k: r, ^& sno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
% K  ?3 h0 b% h+ \; x, Kso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society; c: i; Q; h" {) A8 p5 m
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........2 D0 d$ C+ m  @% x- [  Z8 }
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
  w( a% y, I6 C+ `so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!( C& \9 O6 i0 x
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~8 w1 Q6 I) y' Z& Z+ t+ V; t& Z
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 z. R" t2 C* _, G. v錢就一定罰$ P5 T: F6 ^# `  Z, y" {
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
/ P7 _2 C& w; M2 G7 p# Z唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
9 @2 h  }" R: K% ?1 [% [佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?3 m; I) U) c2 h8 t1 G* m/ j; c( c
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
# `& S1 \0 @3 j" n" q) ~! Z9 j: B% a告得入我切!!!
- f! N7 G7 D+ j/ B- z5 l7 D! z我當初都估告唔入,
6 i9 }+ G- z& }0 o: f; P9 V不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,! [" U- y- L7 e# I# B# @8 g, v/ o
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇+ ~7 s6 ^0 [8 \; a
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:& R- l# w' C, }1 R0 u* d
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
7 \7 j; P# a$ R
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0