
Originally posted by Preston_tron at 2005-5-11 08:40 PM:' Y9 X# I. p' y. b( }& @' P
i think 甲 should seperate into two gruops: one group should 救途人, and other group should help ABCDE五人
Originally posted by 腳指o at 2005-5-11 09:18 PM:
甲...救星先..0 ^' q3 u1 I# d" ?
乙...做錯了
Originally posted by 奇 at 2005-5-11 21:28:
可以看看別人意見
Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-5-11 09:59 PM:: Y8 a- d- h1 z1 X
救援部隊甲應救得就救...途人要救,再以極速去救ABCDE
救援部隊乙肯定不應車死途人
兩隊都胡亂去判斷...不是救援既方針
Originally posted by 老鬼X at 2005-5-12 12:21 AM:- p$ f7 J3 \- ?' c. t$ `: b" U3 [' O
全部都係生命!唔可以因為救一個(多個)而傷害另外一個(多個)生命
生命係平等既 救人係應該救急 唔應該計較多與小
我佛慈悲......?!
Originally posted by city1220 at 2005-5-12 12:59 AM:
我覺得甲同乙都做錯左
人點可以見到不救8 V) W7 q( ?% ]9 l+ T- o
生命係獨一無二既9 [5 }1 T/ z* i0 m/ O8 N& x5 F
唔通一個人既生命唔係生命1 }% k$ t8 W' @. A; q( ~* L
而五個人既生命先係生命# h8 X/ a! Y2 n* ]6 A
人更加唔可以為任何藉口去奪去任何人既生命: u1 P C$ D8 P, H) }
那同殺人有咩分別
Originally posted by wolfevil at 2005-5-12 04:47 AM:3 F& P. n+ U+ [9 X$ d9 c
我都同意甲對, 乙錯. 甲因ABCDE 去救...
Originally posted by yuzhiliang111 at 2005-5-12 02:10 PM:
我們常被教育要顧全大局,但公平嗎?似...
Originally posted by waithung at 2005-5-15 03:11 PM:5 Y7 J5 }8 U1 {" {- C9 q
甲不對!話明救援隊,應該見一個,救一個...
不應該再就this意外增加死傷者!!!即使救回ABCDE~也白白犧牲一個無辜者的性命........+ A; {& k# |1 H& v* O
Originally posted by 奇 at 19xx-6-30 12:48:
" x( q0 q$ `& `
人點可以見到不救?* _3 Z4 a/ Z, f% K' }
咁你就放棄那5人??咁你是否見死不救?$ M0 E z. x9 F: [2 s4 a; j& y
唔通5個人既生命唔係生命??


Originally posted by 老鬼X at 19xx-6-30 20:12:, E- ?; K6 x' `1 ^3 y( M6 g3 g
唉!終於有朋友同我想法差唔多!" ~* j4 x- `: B2 c& |' `
生命係無分輕重架!![]()
Originally posted by xthmkn at 2005-5-16 08:38 PM:0 D. l+ U( [8 o; Y" x! p) n
甲既情況 大家都可以理解到 必要時要...
Originally posted by xthmkn at 19xx-6-30 20:38:
甲既情況 大家都可以理解到 必要時要...
Originally posted by singdotcom at 2005-5-16 08:54 PM:
請問"見死不救"是不是結束一個人生命的一種呢?

| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |