1呀....................~~~& [- X. O" P/ _, v6 i x
靚好多/\/\作者: 151515 時間: 2005-12-20 09:23 PM
Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:, L# I# z, D4 |% _; `, O0 ~/ G
1呀....................~~~ ! d% }& ]+ `! J+ X$ ?& C8 w靚好多/\/\
1 m/ H: {! X! H
3 v7 r0 I+ J. [4 m+ ~6 Y& C
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通5 b3 I- r: M' J
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...1 X1 A4 T. H& X3 D$ K
+ r$ `- d* ]# {1 p3 LSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... + E" d5 ?) P/ Q/ b z: R% e/ m6 x- U. P: k" z& g; M. X5 w
0 j/ r5 h$ a [; O Y5 ^
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地/ O' X& s' x4 k. D
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel... h- V' ~; O* e5 D3 m第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. ; ]+ q3 I: e2 @3 Q: y/ A4 ~sorry...