Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: ( r! ~1 q P+ \7 S6 ~. r. L1呀....................~~~ n" T+ w* b3 H* q" e! r, h F靚好多/\/\
# k4 |. f0 u$ h, X0 h% I9 v. M( U* z: z1 W
$ N: b# \6 L6 ~
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 + y, T& v8 S6 j2 b0 H2 L1 S2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...( c- V9 d3 c) @1 _
3 }( e! c8 q9 @7 a- J, VSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...' k V3 Y; m+ P" v: W