Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: ~4 a- j6 w' _3 W4 P5 b7 U, S1呀....................~~~ % g2 U( G7 _) p8 L) @; a靚好多/\/\
" A0 X1 X8 R$ K7 C/ U2 Y9 Y! w6 W* I& p- |8 H
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通5 b2 ~% d/ o" r2 K
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF... 0 r3 v% ~; g( v" I' X" i5 w 0 P5 g( x7 U5 k' j" N4 y. wSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...# O' }7 B# U( F1 m
( h$ q. t* i0 x3 q
! u6 C0 d# U$ Z" A. {' y' b& z' L( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地6 e0 ~% |6 a6 C# l5 f
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel... j+ U3 \: a9 }8 o y& ~& [- y第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. J. b/ X7 ^. }. ]3 X [
sorry...