<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
; C2 n9 k* ?2 h- }9 |# R( e0 ^' r( ]+ |. i0 m2 F; Z* j
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
# j/ q+ x: N' Y7 Fbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
9 m& v# @2 g  Vso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not; N% A5 u9 O6 G+ D& s. k* K
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
( o! u  J" d5 }, G5 J1 c
5 ~5 ?8 N% h; X! }0 L0 H$ Z3 Uafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
# |4 S  M! H- a$ b/ l2 W2 m
1 G& J0 ?0 W( W. M2 phowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall: l8 ~% J# [/ f
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point, e- ~. z2 ~% Y( X
easily getting worse for yr relationship$ M* C5 D4 A  L2 G; C. i" B
1 x1 W! g; c$ W& P% U& l! H: g
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。