<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
0 c; @. R" ?4 D" T) g1 e! a1 Q# L: a6 E: U6 M" @
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married1 ?: p- u$ P7 E: B7 G( T( C4 a* C
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily( a2 Q4 }1 [8 A7 C3 V  N; g, O
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not2 m6 J1 a9 A, f# \( \
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
0 ~* r7 \# L2 \. O  q8 ?* ^* U  f. ?
$ o* r/ z9 J7 yafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!! w1 d. o0 L6 R# K4 u; }

0 H0 R( M1 V3 [+ vhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
! D2 s( \/ T, F$ g" G/ |living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point7 ^5 z& R; ?' u  O$ p  \
easily getting worse for yr relationship  i% Y: ^! b8 H% W* b7 @
% [  h* n( J* F
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。