<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:7 x8 Q+ N9 a; J1 [, c. u6 r
* d8 V0 t- |) m( p6 Q
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
  t6 y- h8 c! n- U  W% Qbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
9 [! n( i$ h8 X+ J, h/ [2 V& Hso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not$ D3 c! Q1 R+ h* @; M1 w2 L
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!( W5 T/ t3 E) u$ v+ x- z* m6 \0 v! m% o
: c- K, S. S6 T) F9 ^4 J& Y6 B' q
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
1 X+ G3 c4 |; k' @( A
2 q- D4 A3 Y3 A/ ~2 @* whowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
/ n& I5 G# r8 R. G& V+ G  |. y. iliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point( t8 Q' O3 [# w6 P
easily getting worse for yr relationship1 u4 I  W- ], b! F5 Z' h, P

: G. ?1 `- f4 A6 ~6 P. k: d[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。