<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
& t. ]5 {/ ?" H+ _2 e$ M; M4 [  f  f+ n* ~2 o( l+ `! d9 f# ]
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
1 s; L" {( X( e; xbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily3 `8 i2 \0 e4 r; D" e, {% W+ C
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
" C# H3 M  A+ G6 l7 M4 X. a" Oavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
8 L7 m7 }; R4 h! ]! S
  q5 o' i4 ~6 n* ~) Aafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
! E" Q! C  h' o! F  Q+ u
+ t& b2 Z: T; ^/ K- D" W2 Lhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall2 N9 F, D1 z. V& O" {; s5 C
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
3 i' d1 y& {  A  H/ B" n+ peasily getting worse for yr relationship$ U# |; f9 U. i* u

, G, t# U' q: S/ X0 J; M[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。