johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:* C' p: |2 f. G) l/ O

& }0 R6 `6 h  f- V' }) `
/ @. H2 {+ i. T* {& c除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

6 N( B' |  V, J/ d
5 r+ S% |- c# v+ t6 e% d; Y
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
7 M3 m  E& H5 a2 YFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:' ]- C- d2 T6 u  K; y+ }" r
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)1 I- b9 D9 U! M8 M& G
; l# z% l$ K$ N$ ^& M
民事訴訟:
) d1 F) P- n$ w$ D5 b$ w  v1 h4 x告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
  o! X0 ^* J' U3 U仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

. y) G  d# @  n8 e! ^
; {6 B" j& t. F) r9 q+ TNot always... like this case..
0 ^1 q7 d. X: @8 uor SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:7 D4 z, U7 g& U5 \1 H8 ~
我想聽大家自己的觀點
% W- R' L# R3 w1 t6 x如果你喜歡
" L$ }' m& }* ?$ H+ J您可以加入討論* d2 |& l$ a5 l! c  w! m. |6 m
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"$ F3 P" r# k3 G4 j3 I. E1 }
已經代表自己的觀點2 u& t2 i3 W0 M0 M6 d* }
您沒有需要繼續吠4 _# s  R# c- v
THE END

1 L* w$ G8 ^- [# |9 a
1 J1 g' A- [" p' m% NBe careful of your wording...* V4 B5 q- L) A! ^1 ^