johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:& N% [# e% z- v8 B

6 J8 u+ i9 \- j
8 X" H& x5 x% i) b9 W! D& Y$ d除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

) \6 ]6 I5 Z. y% p; l( [; N1 Q, b

& H' F4 X* @0 w2 VThis is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
  |( L' r3 s" J+ G+ h  h# i' n+ S+ uFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:& B" O7 ^# ?# _7 O
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)) t+ F6 c& `. j) }2 I

2 d1 T- R$ r( l! O. Z3 q( G民事訴訟:+ `" j/ u4 B4 ^* r: _1 v
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:3 {, I7 {! Z5 j  c) u" K$ Y# q/ ^9 Q
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

2 _7 t' s. e+ Q6 Q* W) I/ f% c" A% F$ d+ |$ n6 o1 r
Not always... like this case.. , m8 l- ?6 V5 t3 s9 T
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:
& ^9 c6 M+ o$ h% U. @我想聽大家自己的觀點
( a+ i+ W3 \. e如果你喜歡4 X1 I9 N9 }' A
您可以加入討論
) P5 U, G9 L( q* C但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
" A5 \5 v2 s% S已經代表自己的觀點
) c. Q7 O: W, ?6 R4 p4 W您沒有需要繼續吠6 X3 G* ^" u$ @
THE END

- ?3 B/ I' b& q8 o- {2 R

) C- n; P( [1 V# a" S; jBe careful of your wording...% _: ^6 o% v9 @5 Q7 m# I5 ?+ Y