cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-25 07:38 PM:
2 {" I: ]7 h2 W8 o. v' }. p/ |呢d咪民健聯羅
- d6 J1 u* M; [/ ?4 r# {5 X/ ^
, W) M8 T; Z' K) v5 R8 }* g8 m+ R( Xhttp://www.chisin.net/mov01462.mpg

3 ]9 \2 h& }* b4 I5 q
* w* w9 i. [  }  \. V1 o
6 e; |* q5 H: X/ t2 Q( Badmin
  U- o* \9 {  Y" O管理員  
& N, J. b) s% ?- x  g5 M: z0 @4 h  w" B# L4 e
+10
5 m4 S6 ~2 d( @* t) \ * Z; M* p- W( ?, F4 u& N

3 X% }# R, |$ ^' P" X4 @' Q/ ?3 g. R請看此貼:
! D+ T- p4 s3 `8 ghttp://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=29862&fpage=1
9 A; E4 e* Q  u* L# ^/ j
, O1 t5 l6 E2 D" W1 c8 y* X% g& zquote:FKGU0 V, e/ P/ U( S" U
根本就唔係民建聯D人.......
9 {  H5 w$ l2 G; Q; `5 H大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~
3 m+ c3 ?3 y5 d8 `# \! _% H% b3 x% N
  l3 U4 t& ?( W* O
唔鍾意民健聯係一件事, 但不等於可以故意發放虛假資料% M6 m5 a  t  c, k$ y
管理員還獎賞有關網友, 處理是否恰當及公道呢?
( x1 @# ], }; m) U& Z$ c% J難怪近期經常有人批評現在的賞罸制度純粹係版主的喜惡,而非客觀標準

cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-29 12:04 AM:( K: H- q9 v% r. T$ i; j
+ A6 y+ ?/ U5 x( N2 @& e

/ [* t5 k- z4 [9 B& }* i  {9 f1 @( M5 ?8 s6 ^; {6 r& i4 ?
9 M9 I, ^. {( V' X
i admit i wrongly insult in 民健聯 this time and i don't have any preference on this party. I just want to say that how comes you say i am deliberately do this? pls mind your statement.

% F8 K8 n/ @3 Z1 b. A
3 R* E6 r; [3 t" k
( S2 H1 ~9 R: o6 T0 y) F$ F
近期有網友包括我對版主的加/減分決定是有質疑, 並感覺可能有人搏加分會用d出位言論才有此說法, 有關說法對大大造成之不安, 我亦深感遺憾, 因大大既非故意, 所以希望不要介意

cyhk

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/050320/12/1ak8z.html
& b, {: r2 I) o% S: e
+ I& u4 F$ `& i( {6 H4 c+ M
& |' H9 A3 p' `6 h' u根本就唔係民建聯D人.......$ T8 i! h9 S6 N: H( J7 U$ w4 @
大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~