cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-25 07:38 PM:
  n; T; ^+ M- d& e, U8 _8 G2 w呢d咪民健聯羅
! X# B1 _- j7 p$ m( q, F
* }1 L7 W/ {5 u* N/ h3 F- D; i, jhttp://www.chisin.net/mov01462.mpg

) W/ ^) u" e- X# y
$ q. j7 S( p  C) C$ w" Q
2 U+ K% s1 W( G+ x( Q/ \+ _' _! d
admin( N" M4 \0 ?) p" d: L+ T, g4 U; C) u' b  v. v
管理員  
; ?  _) P9 H5 C1 r& |' [  c2 i0 W' }/ \5 L
+10
# Y. B8 }5 R8 k9 t0 ?2 f& k 1 n+ l, ^, t7 K% A9 g2 V( w
2 m  s+ P0 r) u! S9 y
請看此貼:$ r2 O" M, a6 m2 e% f+ L" O+ j0 l
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=29862&fpage=1% O. m6 |. ]7 `1 g& w1 s: X! k: o

$ G) M! `1 z' `quote:FKGU
. J+ N" h* ]; D  J! i5 }0 j根本就唔係民建聯D人.......
: p" D/ S& Z  e& a/ Y5 _8 {大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~
( `# G1 V$ ]/ j% ~: ]( R
" l3 y* Y* G6 ?$ l$ p8 l# |0 v8 y) U1 h) W
唔鍾意民健聯係一件事, 但不等於可以故意發放虛假資料
0 V7 w, K8 G( j" O% i& m管理員還獎賞有關網友, 處理是否恰當及公道呢?) p7 @- N% Y: K% M# S1 ~) `9 X: u
難怪近期經常有人批評現在的賞罸制度純粹係版主的喜惡,而非客觀標準

cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-29 12:04 AM:
, F3 f6 I# ?9 c2 x$ G' C! C2 _; H- K! T3 H: y& n% g' v# M" Q

2 P7 e2 r# y+ ~$ c4 ]# Q, l& `
  G4 W% `+ S) u" V1 w
5 d) {: z5 B- [) H+ ^4 Ni admit i wrongly insult in 民健聯 this time and i don't have any preference on this party. I just want to say that how comes you say i am deliberately do this? pls mind your statement.

" C' G) z1 C1 _# O4 R/ A
, X/ @& `, l; V* s1 B1 k9 y5 {  \" _
近期有網友包括我對版主的加/減分決定是有質疑, 並感覺可能有人搏加分會用d出位言論才有此說法, 有關說法對大大造成之不安, 我亦深感遺憾, 因大大既非故意, 所以希望不要介意

cyhk

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/050320/12/1ak8z.html: j$ t5 u1 T( e1 {. a4 E6 z
  ?! R3 \* W5 ~4 x: N6 G2 Y+ ]3 m

# y, b$ Y0 f/ C& j! i. _  I根本就唔係民建聯D人........ _4 b' V; B: E( u
大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~