LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢* _$ Y' ]' d$ s' K; a2 j( s* U
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權$ }! @: S( V8 f4 Q; q
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:! g# c* C7 L. `5 o' x* o8 h
所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law
( g* a( n8 r6 P; R6 ?% ?( P% n* k/ {6 Z  Q8 W6 I  S; g
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

7 K% z4 p" E3 z) W- |& q' f2 F但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:0 g$ d( j! C) Q' V' p
咁就好正啦...  r8 @4 W: J( k' k: O
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

3 w3 `6 I0 O" z! n+ g所以我先唔明) X! W& N8 i) _; M: Z0 P7 T
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜
+ b9 ^+ A, l7 I0 n, U7 s; b7 ^0 E棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
, M1 r3 ^+ \9 ]7 [這是兩回事，
( o6 f9 {% v4 e4 L4 kMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
- F" q* v( o- L正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，/ _8 }' S3 K& S" Y8 X
與商品和商家無關.
. U, T9 x% C3 ^7 u, r6 X雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......
0 b+ `$ }& V# U% a& v. X+ j

& Q( \$ Z3 W$ `d公司全部都利字當頭
9 T! b- \+ U# }+ D) _& v, F5 P& @& K佢真係睬你都傻啦..
  i" u( B6 ]+ O9 M! m唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:' Y  t) o/ P7 s# l" w  K( W
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

6 J) g. P7 A, [6 q* A- n/ M我有兩部喎
( S) v7 S0 f  L; M咁我咪double懲罰??