LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢3 e' W# _  h% U& L& Z) i" A
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權! t% Q% L  S- L
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
0 {( a* }1 B' E( m4 ?  h所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law. \6 \) c+ ?+ n4 c

! |  W& ]5 c. R7 ]5 m, ~! F4 E(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

: V4 Y2 Q$ P, C7 k, S  }
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
% M- Q$ e' ]' O- P* Q# _咁就好正啦...
& o# ]* {1 i1 {/ j  b咁直係話個個出街攞住...

3 l  d+ m" h* i5 _
所以我先唔明
+ \6 d& k5 r  v( l咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜4 i5 R6 \) N: Y. V
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:9 M  E2 C1 I& W+ a9 `0 o
這是兩回事，
! b! r7 i6 d" O+ ^# c: p2 YMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，1 K: j  X+ Y4 t: Q
正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，. f( O8 ^2 `# L  u: ^$ I+ V
與商品和商家無關.5 {& M5 c' u7 a2 T& S
雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......
7 L% |- V! `& [! ~, Y: R8 o

, H! X- W7 b9 S3 R1 Yd公司全部都利字當頭; C$ O; M% P' a( z/ }6 ]- C
佢真係睬你都傻啦..1 J! g" j& ~+ Z1 R# ]
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:* M/ L6 O7 D" I* x: U9 _( p
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

- G# r9 S6 y5 E* N1 k( K0 n
我有兩部喎
& o, z9 d4 e6 n, M咁我咪double懲罰??