F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
/ G' I$ {( Y; f  @6 Q7 b/ ^M is for his pride
- Z2 S$ x1 s$ u  w$ V9 IL is for visiting her lover; h6 v+ p4 j  l4 U. L2 M$ b2 Y
B is for money
4 B( t/ K* Y. s/ j! x6 ~7 PS is for sex' _, ]$ U$ m% h9 |: }# l- C
except F, he can't get anything; h7 o/ o$ z% t/ I4 h# U
but he just did something wrong for friends
- s" b! T( |4 G- Q% b/ A8 ~therefore, I wound like to support F/ s5 \! Y. i- E0 ]% t1 X
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
0 d& s5 f  S% C# |
2 s: Q5 M$ y& _from good to bad1 V2 L  N/ {6 U2 P5 \& e4 d
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:0 D3 U% ^( D( @( b, Q
準時12:00
+ f3 V0 v) x, k( f! i$ W
7 X$ n; o. z, r* r+ h" m6 q[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
% w2 o: k& a" \& k! aI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
6 [2 p7 m5 E% n: K( m7 i, f* ]+ I/ D* p. {! c1 X2 J
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
- q( z0 d2 N9 [5 g% K# b* E+ ?9 K4 k, M$ c1 P+ Y
I believe this is very hard to be together
7 z" G' a4 b3 jbut I still trust that both of them can be together