F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves  @* f' {/ i! U, \5 p+ W5 X
M is for his pride) i9 W1 U% v8 K% d+ w" k+ K$ _: Z7 r4 W
L is for visiting her lover; K0 i7 e' J4 {! ]0 X4 Z
B is for money
+ H. L% ~  r3 G; h# D/ Z/ QS is for sex
0 b) [' a: L( vexcept F, he can't get anything: K8 A) a$ \# C8 b' I% F
but he just did something wrong for friends
) v$ t6 M" y  ^$ X% Stherefore, I wound like to support F  k* N, h8 |7 D0 J: L) ~
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
' v, H/ V8 \: Q6 g) \/ J% _% S1 _) h1 ~
from good to bad
  u1 k2 h. h9 x; ?4 H' o, ?' hF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:0 M" {& I/ y/ \7 h
準時12:00$ n. [7 P  Y2 L  u

5 m$ j4 C* g& Z[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me6 w' }6 N) y2 Y' o4 C7 z, d
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
2 v9 f: p4 J4 H2 M" r1 N$ c1 T  k6 j) r0 S
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?" F' z9 g/ ?7 r2 B8 D9 c

9 T* F& }0 Q* K4 X; v( RI believe this is very hard to be together
' T5 ]8 r1 n( l' k6 i/ tbut I still trust that both of them can be together