F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
% ~; L' o7 |7 U8 p/ ZM is for his pride" O4 W7 ?9 B, }9 Z! ~
L is for visiting her lover
; \. O1 r: ]$ E' S- gB is for money2 e9 ]! I4 R$ Z  l
S is for sex' B- [- j# T4 Q, u3 x4 J  [
except F, he can't get anything
' U% [& N& k$ J/ D0 m: Wbut he just did something wrong for friends
4 J, B% {; c2 otherefore, I wound like to support F
4 j) t' l; O( j# GActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything- n; X1 C3 V; ~) S

( I6 e" y# t4 yfrom good to bad$ q, u3 s) K% R& [+ ^
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
) U! \; D. c! Z* y- Q準時12:00
" ]9 @: O8 \' R# [& J7 \4 F
" p! O8 ~6 W2 R5 C& D; n+ V[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
/ y& y3 s; Y3 T- q  E# cI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
: Z, ]7 A- [& E5 b/ ]" H; A4 U- J  ^0 v" O2 @1 m: N( l
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?/ M4 I. C9 r% M9 Y& p$ x3 V
% A0 C& o4 V: e4 B4 ?* l) Q* ]1 F2 t
I believe this is very hard to be together5 z  @! H- b+ S
but I still trust that both of them can be together