F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
( {$ S5 R( s/ R5 G' K# C! sM is for his pride
9 R* U2 `( |; x5 G9 _# }& UL is for visiting her lover
$ {4 ?$ r, |; r3 Y( mB is for money* I! H6 H) M5 L, W: j& a+ l2 |
S is for sex
; @# ^1 e$ \, w5 D* s0 ]except F, he can't get anything
3 e- S( D  Z" Jbut he just did something wrong for friends
4 o7 v" X% ~" m. f# Ptherefore, I wound like to support F
. M+ q3 `* h* pActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything+ c0 f8 R2 ^/ `7 H2 o
2 K; M: n. X* O. l
from good to bad4 }, K/ _( l- p  z
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:- ?0 W$ q6 S  W$ J7 ~- G9 ?
準時12:006 E7 d% R% H2 k( Z/ I
" M1 K  L/ `5 {1 R9 o+ _
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me$ A# o6 Z8 ?6 J& M' M! Y4 w
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case$ e" ~/ M6 N+ y$ W
# |4 b) c* M* I) c% Z
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
* k( S. U& j+ s6 f0 ?/ d, O# `0 C) ?" k" E: i" P
I believe this is very hard to be together9 r) k) x0 h' v6 r! r# b; q
but I still trust that both of them can be together