F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
3 l" B/ t+ p. h. z/ D6 OM is for his pride
: ]) z* u" d  ]L is for visiting her lover
# i  E5 f/ B/ L# m' l1 mB is for money
: V5 H- a/ [: U; r: }! z3 }( ^9 P3 m5 ZS is for sex# n; i: ]6 |# c& z' |& o
except F, he can't get anything
: _; m3 \5 g- D" fbut he just did something wrong for friends3 y6 G4 L& P4 X
therefore, I wound like to support F/ H/ W5 W' @- N9 F4 \! d2 ^+ f
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
% f3 h& V( o- {/ l; h( G% i4 h
  I, y) D5 k3 Hfrom good to bad
9 f, w% Z4 t  b0 eF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
; ]2 o4 @0 D  l8 V準時12:00
; k9 s8 ?5 w& Y  w% S% Q: a* `+ U7 L$ _/ H
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me  m/ {9 G' ]/ N( h
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
" G, K3 h- X0 J" `- b( J+ W9 m7 S5 y! H4 a( e& F! m
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?+ d6 w9 ?- ^6 W* L+ h
. X2 d0 R, K& D3 n# u
I believe this is very hard to be together
: J' B+ k3 P6 n, @but I still trust that both of them can be together