F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
2 M0 ]$ o5 u& }0 U, y0 g) BM is for his pride
3 C# f/ [; v; [, d: ?1 a6 ]L is for visiting her lover" N( N- W' K: f4 M( f6 `) G- f$ g
B is for money
( x- r! R, B* J6 bS is for sex- u4 D& f, w7 Y
except F, he can't get anything
. O' {: G5 d) X5 S9 sbut he just did something wrong for friends
# I/ [( s# z( @2 Ktherefore, I wound like to support F
. u" D7 [/ z. f& h8 K3 l( ]) i( fActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything% L, M: U' m( \- D: [
' A: T& T( a4 {* E8 f2 z4 h; h
from good to bad) c3 A. R9 B0 Q( R
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:  n, o1 E* l7 C
準時12:00
( h5 f5 E2 i  j0 @, b8 T, B2 e! p4 s: o) P
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me1 K; n1 ~# X& U* ]+ ]8 S% g0 w
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case) q: r6 A  [5 k8 C
( t( B0 I! z  |3 d$ N6 _
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
" g- Q% `% w/ {8 S, `
  t6 j+ J# m* n% h( S4 II believe this is very hard to be together1 ]/ C0 ?  U5 C& a7 |2 T6 Y
but I still trust that both of them can be together