F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
. @8 \4 e. Z: B4 NM is for his pride# ~  d1 ?0 r  s% K& \0 `# L
L is for visiting her lover5 Q6 c/ e0 E* a4 d; ~) [! m/ x
B is for money7 d; p. @5 G. P- X
S is for sex
) Q0 @6 g; f4 _' L0 b9 Y2 Dexcept F, he can't get anything7 l& n. y) L1 W( R5 l9 Z
but he just did something wrong for friends
/ @5 J' _6 |. c+ g. v9 ctherefore, I wound like to support F- w% k! d/ C4 x) t. _
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything1 ]/ [' J' X  d2 w
: v' M6 j) O: N+ Z$ e
from good to bad
) x) h8 L; B2 uF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:  q# |5 ]4 [& g+ \
準時12:003 B) x7 I7 [  k, r

8 p$ V" \( D6 O( L[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
1 I& M% _- Y6 g2 n$ g- A! l  o/ |I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
5 ~+ m# W4 V+ C5 m. M# h) S/ @4 A
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
) s2 }" E+ x  g. K3 I) l
# |+ M: D: V$ ?+ n, g- }- ^I believe this is very hard to be together1 z! ^! D# \# _# N
but I still trust that both of them can be together