F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves* k1 P* }) C. p
M is for his pride  K  K  a& l9 o' z) I
L is for visiting her lover
9 @) a6 t5 R0 AB is for money  A  q9 S7 F) f7 k! v. z& \- Y" x% n$ _
S is for sex
! M- S  v" ?( _1 V3 l2 p7 Texcept F, he can't get anything1 O$ _3 q" Y  H5 o; c1 p, [! ^9 c
but he just did something wrong for friends+ N2 l& J8 T) S7 G
therefore, I wound like to support F6 U) {. i4 x6 O! P* a! I
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything: }# k) X4 y5 k; r% f

) R# j: |8 z$ z, H/ ]2 B. }from good to bad, n" H$ f! L0 A  |$ K$ x
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
$ ^& n0 R5 n, c* d8 j4 k8 K4 v, ?' r準時12:00
' s( s5 V% a+ x. F& p+ z# p+ i. v
+ {' _4 y+ ?4 V( ~[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me* z. ~% b; R: J5 S" a* W2 v' ~
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case: m. s2 \; Q5 y1 _. m

" j, B  K; b' f7 P0 e2 N5 Z) B2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
6 |0 p$ g& y2 D4 P! I& {" {1 V* Z8 B4 t
: I) v; x; z2 L3 _I believe this is very hard to be together
: B+ ^8 Y) _4 s3 `& p! g' Hbut I still trust that both of them can be together