F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves, b( h1 Y) \" m
M is for his pride
- u4 D5 p3 Z( z3 i& aL is for visiting her lover7 \9 |& M5 h* r' E2 u
B is for money
; h2 b$ x0 T# ~S is for sex# f. s, A, U9 D# ]2 L
except F, he can't get anything
4 L; K( H3 v* J2 y  `7 w/ e( A; Gbut he just did something wrong for friends$ T9 ]- ~: J0 z5 o8 X/ H( a  _
therefore, I wound like to support F/ x5 C$ C# s8 b
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything8 E0 j* P3 D. _# q

8 P! U. }* }( w1 U4 ifrom good to bad) H9 a* e$ {* n; O, I5 ^5 H
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:, Z9 S! T/ {# z$ c' ?- _. z
準時12:00
" o6 N4 i6 C! C% C4 l' \2 w& _
. x7 h, X1 `! b6 D% r5 F[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me. a- r& O( @7 N7 w
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case# f% b1 P- {" C' B, N: G1 o

/ w3 G5 J/ }  Y7 V) P8 H2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?9 o$ O* U8 W3 ~: I

6 m; s1 J$ r) p& M. {I believe this is very hard to be together
/ z' V: O# J; j1 v3 Wbut I still trust that both of them can be together