F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves1 e$ V7 q: w0 e, ?) [6 V  ?) ~
M is for his pride
' b; e, j3 f. R- ~. B" O4 d5 f/ RL is for visiting her lover$ H; Q6 d- p6 f9 G  W  R/ _" j6 R
B is for money
+ ]! q* q1 y: j7 v+ n5 R# Z: J- jS is for sex
6 Q3 ?2 {) F, o: n; q/ w# ^except F, he can't get anything, m6 p4 K$ [! P( m  ?) w7 S  L
but he just did something wrong for friends
( m" L5 \& e4 L0 W- {therefore, I wound like to support F. B, `/ R1 T1 r4 e: U
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything& Q* k8 ?& T- A6 I* `) d
& \# ]- c! n6 X+ v
from good to bad7 J% y" s7 X3 |: L- v" M; t3 K5 |
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:. V7 I* _, \! Y- v
準時12:00$ C1 q4 n& t* _
6 n- r- I* b: ]9 {" A" l8 Z
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me/ y) ^, F  h3 T. ]* v8 G
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case" d$ y% e% ~( U) s( ]
9 [1 Z! R0 y/ t+ j) q4 q
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?7 w" H2 w( z" w/ r
9 z6 n; b) E; }7 C- B* o4 e$ K/ f
I believe this is very hard to be together
3 m- V5 X; `- Sbut I still trust that both of them can be together