F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
) b0 Z1 f0 N* \: J7 XM is for his pride. j3 z- R& A" v5 L; r) H
L is for visiting her lover
# W8 }. O" T* f! O9 p* v' o, J, O2 {7 sB is for money% V* W/ N& f$ O
S is for sex) g* L% n" ~; O! A! f
except F, he can't get anything! t( e$ F* z3 G. }
but he just did something wrong for friends
# q0 P! l) ]" X( B4 b  vtherefore, I wound like to support F
+ {6 b4 l2 U  \; i! M( D0 vActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything, V/ R) A8 L" z# M6 P

9 `% A) C2 n# \% P  pfrom good to bad
/ \' d2 m1 H6 }( a& e1 aF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
+ n' X- x% R1 {" w2 f; u準時12:00
* K/ X- }( o/ `$ M3 {) \( `+ q
1 V7 _' N. U+ J8 j6 D( x[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
$ K5 R" _/ Z" d1 y- [* f- FI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
2 i5 e  |! I, h" n( x9 `8 |' n0 T) e5 P. s
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?. U0 Z7 _9 c) J* R% D
9 _# |! ?* ^1 c3 w1 g3 C
I believe this is very hard to be together) w' G5 R# j+ J2 {$ g
but I still trust that both of them can be together