F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
& o  y- y. q+ s& d/ |6 j# j: _M is for his pride
' c$ {2 Y9 M9 M& M" y* w2 Y6 RL is for visiting her lover
9 J2 Z$ A. Y/ H& Z8 a+ BB is for money
; x9 d& v* b# t) V3 zS is for sex
; B9 W2 ]! `; x/ X' h1 Cexcept F, he can't get anything
* I1 O4 A% F* ^: J7 `2 H3 j; G9 i, Cbut he just did something wrong for friends
% U: F( c/ ]9 p4 ]: G& s" j4 Mtherefore, I wound like to support F( ?- d( B9 u; _( C( w
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything/ E, R, t2 u1 |; Y

- y$ S, L& a1 T9 S+ Pfrom good to bad
! o5 x) U. M- b+ x  ZF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:, f$ R4 m7 Z" o' \- j
準時12:00
6 ~0 z+ @8 @) r- N8 [2 ~/ d/ q3 S; c4 t- W2 ], P3 s& W' J
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
8 G8 E) R" s/ [6 o3 NI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case" a* l7 e7 o4 o8 D' w
) x) l7 \& f8 H* m& J7 b5 f
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
& [( [- A: K# P4 R' t. J6 |% x. n3 m
I believe this is very hard to be together
; K) v; T7 j! a+ W, X. E! Ibut I still trust that both of them can be together