F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves1 b& @6 o2 r2 p
M is for his pride/ D. N7 t$ Z$ a
L is for visiting her lover
: e3 h: R* L& v! [5 [" V" nB is for money
8 x) O0 l1 ~1 z" HS is for sex" Y* J+ Z8 O+ N2 |+ |/ |5 _
except F, he can't get anything5 @" Z; z, X2 f
but he just did something wrong for friends0 Q& h/ E- l2 n  R, g8 s
therefore, I wound like to support F0 K4 J; }  L$ E, S6 k+ @9 @' n
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
- L# z2 ^1 h7 X2 w5 |( t
* q( l0 x3 G7 S# }from good to bad
4 z3 Y# A% U! ]) f  P, QF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:7 e/ |$ |+ I4 \9 n
準時12:00& o# {. h$ w* U+ |' J$ h8 G7 O
+ i, v3 \% V; ~
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
+ _2 L* o& K6 xI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case' k% [6 ?( ^5 W. C

) _) {# f2 [2 z" w2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?7 }6 V$ d, Z1 M: c- l( L6 X. i

+ ?& ^8 S. K6 N+ @I believe this is very hard to be together* `/ R: L6 w4 W9 ^4 O' Y* A
but I still trust that both of them can be together