F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves' S! w9 Q1 I7 s" R: Z7 ?" Z
M is for his pride
% Z' F2 j' E- T( I7 VL is for visiting her lover
/ h9 V* ?- r) iB is for money8 h8 m( X( Y4 W. T
S is for sex
5 z5 H, \7 K6 C5 j, ]9 ^' `6 Xexcept F, he can't get anything
4 A8 L7 D4 @3 c0 Sbut he just did something wrong for friends
7 y6 d& ]5 z2 h0 p. g5 e% }2 ?therefore, I wound like to support F1 D! i; O; u: x0 Y8 R
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
( F! W- Q  s5 m% i) R
; J# T$ ~3 m/ @1 Bfrom good to bad
2 O/ x  J6 f* r% O( EF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
5 ]/ m2 Y* d: H* K) m準時12:00
3 M* ~5 T; Y+ u" `) R4 M+ \% X/ v4 B& c- {
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me, e/ S1 z! U) I
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case6 [. h( a5 _) P  f- g

. N8 ?$ f: P0 @6 ^2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
& @4 @+ Z/ x* h; b9 @
* e. H. b2 \1 K2 }: W% G9 E1 \I believe this is very hard to be together, N. n/ t: F) M1 J8 ~% M
but I still trust that both of them can be together