F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves6 V# k+ f. R/ L( L
M is for his pride
4 C$ ?2 ~; v2 B/ vL is for visiting her lover
3 J* v) f; {% h5 P% s) J# {( zB is for money2 F- g: S2 y( K  N
S is for sex
6 x6 u" B+ _" ~2 \. v# Z: cexcept F, he can't get anything
' ]) @2 h7 Q. q4 T6 z$ ?but he just did something wrong for friends
( f0 E0 b8 x# C- r' k$ o- d! [therefore, I wound like to support F& B/ l7 p# \) D4 n# t+ Q
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
% E* t  s: N. D9 O$ `8 y  u' M4 p1 z9 x9 O( z) [; B
from good to bad: ]0 A0 Q7 d9 L4 ^5 [
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:( @+ M3 W4 R; t
準時12:00
4 \! r1 U: B/ ?) B# k5 l  f: l/ f3 D1 C; T) }( p* D3 r9 t) v
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me$ T6 I# t( D; ^5 s" E3 l& p0 i  d
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
$ X5 P( @: r# e) H; h. a. w7 m; X7 C- d9 y( X8 C1 n
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?& [" I' r& b0 ~$ x4 j4 T% T

' [" x- K$ I6 {. X. G0 M1 mI believe this is very hard to be together
; M0 o, ~' U" Abut I still trust that both of them can be together