F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves. ]% b" v  Z4 Q: h' {
M is for his pride: ?/ t0 d6 M5 O3 m) X5 {! H
L is for visiting her lover$ U: T6 @$ |9 F
B is for money
; N0 H$ Z2 y/ ~* T5 O( w! NS is for sex3 r; a, ?' r. D/ _! M3 \& s
except F, he can't get anything
8 d5 ]( Y! ~5 d( E1 K  W# Vbut he just did something wrong for friends
0 o* \4 h& V" _& t) Q0 S) {therefore, I wound like to support F
1 U! j, b  b8 q1 b7 TActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything! w7 a; N& v6 H5 p) g
9 W) z8 E) q0 X7 j: S
from good to bad
# @6 A$ p7 h- ~+ c" l6 M' NF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ L# t0 h# j+ M) d5 ?2 M$ O準時12:00
1 G- E: p7 e) L* k8 @. x
) |% \9 c  S0 a[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me+ j# d4 b" B( ?$ v9 F7 D* B* L
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
/ {" [' y, Y$ F. h1 G- N! J: q
+ |4 G) V1 N$ ?: [) n2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?/ \% Y% N0 g8 @0 [% a. G; p. M
6 J6 N! j$ u7 h9 R+ w4 P: n% T$ c# @
I believe this is very hard to be together  T7 [8 s! M7 q8 t
but I still trust that both of them can be together