jsqaure99

true say, good example.1 T; u$ k- }/ j1 ~  G1 o2 F
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
2 u; l+ B& j% ptrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
  g( v, z* v! wno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
. p5 I& G) g% l2 g* q8 o  T! ONO OFFENCE
) Q( c0 `% O% z" Y- Y但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
( k! e# s: Y2 @' a6 V係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
, A# [; l! m! `& v! l$ l* n# p7 f: ~IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
/ D, S$ E! T1 p" ^9 |IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢5 E3 L! R% z' A6 ?" Z4 N9 N" m
我唔知" X( _$ h7 V: x6 c- R) z  Y, `
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐2 ?, I: _) I! a- _" Y' D* j: B+ ]  _
會唔會覺得未夠班呢0 _2 a) @% r- Y# O7 t4 h' K6 ^
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附( F! \5 l3 ^7 {
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇- \) V+ O/ E, Q' k  b  O, l9 L* N4 M
又點解釋
4 T' u' O9 k$ L" _  A+ B2 l) g0 l) |/ v/ W  O
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
( }8 {  B* j" [0 P+ E. ~以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 U5 E* K) m' J6 w, q# p2 K家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材' I1 p6 o9 x5 r, U4 d* L, w5 S8 B
講得好7 J# l' L+ t0 N& J% m9 }
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
/ G1 `# w5 q( h# d3 q" e8 e我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
8 U, ]( D9 l/ b4 `* K. b$ ?2 k7 l( E# g
+ D( N/ O) n; Q* T& \5 i8 E$ v
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
4 `& L, u# v% G$ x! D1 g& }
9 s$ \& c3 b! W7 T用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

  v2 N2 T( K! N, V9 L- q& h% R' x
" P# h, Q) X9 u+ V& e: N4 K# G5 y& B8 g* Z- u" E8 R3 R
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗