jsqaure99

true say, good example.
* ~. u# f2 l/ y' x1 Dby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.' y! A$ U% ^2 z. h# w& C
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
( {' Q) c! W+ B* B* ?no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕; T! C; ^# D+ g- E2 z' i+ o
NO OFFENCE
; y% V0 c7 X0 i, _' s- A9 n& q但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
5 ~0 t$ d6 M+ F$ f: Z係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
& G& ~1 }2 ]* K$ y: M# j6 w* p+ VIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
* O8 ?0 H" t1 v: p5 |! ~8 @IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢# w0 H4 T$ Z# m
我唔知. L4 \; R( i9 K7 A6 g0 l
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐9 R4 s2 @" U  ?; b8 I8 m
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
9 M7 _- k" M4 W- Q0 G人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
+ d* t7 h/ k1 ?% V( k/ N但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇" Q, A5 \7 s4 h- ~( E
又點解釋
$ {1 Q' M% X  `7 `* {, ]8 G' V# T5 a9 o2 ~3 M+ a
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回8 C# o. P* r0 e
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 ~) r: ]( t! C! A  X2 X, i家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材- r4 S1 D  u: W8 P4 Z! E, Z
講得好
7 Q: F* N! I3 j仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈6 n" m# \2 b0 t7 c. U0 i( o" ~1 L
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
) O& m; U* y" r# a1 }) n6 R8 ?* ^& M- e1 w
1 Z5 N/ q- r9 c/ A% f
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據% J1 [/ W6 ^! l5 P' ]9 x

3 b1 h$ ^9 p6 o3 _! [用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 O! n, C6 t8 ], ]

$ I6 U/ t7 {# G3 w. h* x$ @
# w4 S  h2 N' ^$ o! }唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗