jsqaure99

true say, good example.
$ e( Z+ g- F9 J+ `' z! l* Gby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.. J& O9 G8 ?6 X# Q) `
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
9 W# k# r# F( Kno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕: G8 _: p9 {. A6 r: |
NO OFFENCE ) I) r: [# \, S9 m' O; _/ Z
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
8 ]3 E" i0 B+ K4 z, t: X' y係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
  g$ u9 b" n' y: \IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢& D3 T8 o" @9 f3 j  x
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢, j6 b+ P! \* i5 j2 _, O
我唔知
7 W6 a  o5 m* w- r& `2 ]但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐2 j$ R" A+ z' H  i/ i- ^+ @
會唔會覺得未夠班呢$ t/ ^+ q2 ^9 M# t
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
0 |, c! C& Y' C$ N4 F但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇2 K% }+ W# M2 Q$ ^5 z4 ^1 L, \
又點解釋* C8 d2 }8 f' h- v9 w& }
2 X' y: \& y+ B+ X- q. c
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回( @  ]. R- Y/ S% O
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
2 r: M* R' s3 F+ N- \( R4 f家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材" _3 X6 k$ m0 C6 q/ e  Z
講得好5 j; L4 ^2 y; x' [' H
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈  B% j2 R$ s! @1 x. {  d
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:2 w% P# y/ r- k4 |5 S. O( _( V

( k6 w2 z% F( O$ I$ X. d' L) u5 A) }3 E, h. u
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據6 g# Q6 Y1 y$ ~% k
1 \% Q4 o" G& {+ \0 r2 V* R" [- K( g
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

$ ~9 @9 e5 {0 g4 C% e
9 _& t6 W  h8 ]% N7 h

. ]' g- a$ p/ f7 H" E唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗