jsqaure99

true say, good example.
( N+ b2 L$ ]' K' e+ Xby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.6 _' J0 g+ D& ?% }* `7 u/ N. b* A" r
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
. U: d4 K4 @9 _7 I' s7 ~no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
, i- C' ]+ J% K, m/ ?8 a: Q6 N% s# wNO OFFENCE - @5 R6 l6 T: w: S3 g% X
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣. p$ Z# s8 v- i7 R( }1 Q
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
$ H& D# Q3 q3 E( [, y0 j* HIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢  `5 K' B" N% ^, q; {6 @/ y
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 D: t/ Q, O0 D0 q
我唔知' x, C- L' R. u: [) L
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
) Y9 V: n; L$ d/ \會唔會覺得未夠班呢
0 y7 m5 s7 X/ }2 B( b. j人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附# W5 h, V. g9 Z6 h+ E
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇5 ]7 z2 R- y6 `. V: c" |% Z
又點解釋
* T% m( a/ z9 T- o3 _) x! i# `) [" ^& U( N
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回2 Z8 e: z1 d$ L" N: v' w9 n' e* `, {
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到8 @. ?: |3 p' U
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
( i4 E' p0 m# [: m7 l講得好* c0 h+ }! |$ r
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈6 C$ _' k) M& Y, {- b
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
- ^( W- k5 ]# V: z% a! Y# }! ?* R0 W# d8 M5 O

7 b" a. T$ ?4 I4 x証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
. M+ Z' A5 |, C; q7 K. i! Y- e- A' K
, Z6 h8 M) |4 F: F0 D( y1 F用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

2 B/ F& z0 ~. v. S/ Z* L+ C: `& H# B
/ D; v$ a  Y) g4 V& Q! O2 |3 g
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗