jsqaure99

true say, good example.2 Q# r9 R6 u5 S3 s
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.% L4 j% [) m8 b+ m7 u! ~1 B2 i
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.6 {& p6 n( N3 }& b8 z, h
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
, Z# [0 B3 p# a( N) r4 b3 u  KNO OFFENCE
" N* }/ `: O2 `1 I; P  c# m但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
, b  \6 K' t( F; X- f  ]& l- y# Q! B係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
/ r2 ^" x' ^! l0 s4 W0 K  ~( R1 NIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢1 x0 p% {5 b( W* A4 p3 P; n0 y
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢  ~( R1 |: a, {
我唔知  A3 R: z/ o0 a/ ?/ ^% s
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
8 V  z' [1 T3 r9 D  d8 ^會唔會覺得未夠班呢
' J2 M2 T+ S! `; j; y; x* G人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附) H6 X# [$ u) E5 A2 W: B& V
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
) R$ V) \; N& C1 R1 }' e又點解釋8 u" _5 g& A. F8 J* y

% a% o" f7 W$ B, ~' O2 m7 ?" `仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回" L. z! E, Q6 D
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
* V$ h: v0 h3 p家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材9 ~$ W3 |, {+ }1 d8 \# Q& ~' l' V
講得好( J7 ~, Q+ W6 G$ X( n
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
/ y$ L1 H8 |/ p; \8 J7 h我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:7 ~3 o; t9 |/ Q6 T; R* z8 y  f6 f# i
; W1 Q+ }3 x6 q! E$ W

! m: b6 V/ o5 y6 x+ R証據...係要証實左既先叫証據  x# B* @0 M, o4 v& p

& B2 N+ B$ ^" N. E% E用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

) B8 o3 o: x1 i+ R; B
1 c+ J- Q) ~: i& V

' J8 E0 e) [8 |% y& J" e* ~) S唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗