jsqaure99

true say, good example./ {. o% [9 w+ M# t) T2 b
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
. R- V, u% ]/ n$ T& c( ztrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
' m& V9 n# s  l7 n" p9 Pno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕! G; j; ^  G7 O5 `) ^9 a( H" y9 _
NO OFFENCE
6 T: r+ Y8 a# N9 p但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣" p- L: t8 q8 \( {4 s, F- A
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢4 x9 ]6 c3 J4 @/ y; L, P+ s5 }3 S
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
/ t+ u5 _& K: D: D" |/ r- `2 jIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
* F( s% ~( x- D1 S) U2 @; U我唔知" v4 O6 D; P* a
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
2 J' M3 q  F' C2 @! m8 `會唔會覺得未夠班呢
+ |4 c$ z# m. ]2 O: D. Q+ S, o人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附: c9 E; b8 e' E- s( s8 K/ d# A
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇+ \2 q+ v; x% z$ m7 ?
又點解釋
& h- L0 j+ W0 j) i% g: l9 r0 D$ X, J0 [4 Y
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回& P0 ~: `% j1 {( q! k2 S  O
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
( _& n$ J4 t8 _家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
+ ]0 s6 F( |) G0 F( p, F6 |講得好) B5 Z; z# M( b
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈( s- V$ i% T; Q3 _. Z+ H, [
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
) z% o/ X- p; h6 d* A0 \. u6 _* V8 H$ h: ~% j8 K$ i
! H7 F" A7 ]4 l/ F3 `6 d
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據+ H$ e. p6 p& M' R' Z' `) c

9 F% ~% L' X& ~; _% Z. o# @; Z用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

- y' ?; g! ~0 {6 y) d

3 O( w+ E2 R6 |3 y* N
5 a) t; j+ J6 v6 y- K% S" J6 {唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗