jsqaure99

true say, good example.* H% n: x# v9 R8 s/ b
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
: ]) W& F, u4 c/ m$ |5 b0 v, ?trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will., z7 H9 y- Z+ A: w- B
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
+ Z2 N  m& n* f6 d$ I" L: mNO OFFENCE 9 u! L8 V. C. w( b. _0 X0 Z; s* P
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣7 I5 N/ I; V2 M" e4 ~
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢# z& b$ v4 a* z% v  I
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢+ z/ x1 v7 n9 z' y( U
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
4 S. M9 z' p* K2 V" e7 ^6 M5 o$ G我唔知, A# U* w; p* ~5 _9 w
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐2 U0 a* O. P: O4 n: F! Z' R& M
會唔會覺得未夠班呢1 P4 C4 n7 C5 X
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
2 E7 m/ p" Z% I' Q但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇, k8 J- _1 ?- a4 M
又點解釋* I$ B) F% }; J4 T) U

4 ?5 @" B+ d" U仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
4 j/ Y' x; a# [) t- o+ @以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
$ v+ G% x# U- ~) ?6 D8 f. X) Z) I家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
! B  O& x6 b' ]' r講得好; ^/ ]$ e/ ]8 t# l) i4 e
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈( E% W* t# i+ j/ Y- L
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:. s6 i* }8 s6 l. `/ W
; c( u" Z8 [" G( e5 @0 K
& C8 v9 E9 M' \5 Q
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據1 c& {) m/ r' d/ @, [. @9 y

" r& w/ r0 R& F- x0 B用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

, J4 r1 F) q  m! d, E: V7 \) @

7 e% u- B6 b6 z* f1 d1 r5 Z/ U
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗