jsqaure99

true say, good example.
9 q- q. U  l) C. W; ~1 nby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
  }$ d& q; B4 y5 ~+ z3 R# v" U; ^trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
+ [. p" \) ^% u3 |5 K! X7 u. n- H4 pno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
/ ^" V) G8 \( r; {) j% `NO OFFENCE
4 N* E/ \+ {2 P. w1 w/ t/ l0 Z但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
( b& ?" E/ g( d8 D+ h7 Y4 b" x係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
" W; D- b/ m# b7 s. z3 B, y. G+ ]. HIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
2 B4 B- r3 T7 KIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢, }5 e; e1 f: y
我唔知5 O8 F6 B- e% s& X, \
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐% S" o9 O6 P- S6 Y
會唔會覺得未夠班呢8 E$ F  l1 b$ u# X4 R( Y; ~. t2 T
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附/ u( Z9 ^' i3 L" m6 w' x
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
" _- |! Q$ g, S5 Q又點解釋/ y; |% @% Z. L3 p1 M7 X( _' r

  u0 o4 D1 v4 A仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回8 G- o, H; ]) I5 U  P9 A0 A
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到9 w  x7 Q8 Y' e4 d# I
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
0 |4 P. m. x, k2 P( N! q  ]4 B1 ]講得好
4 e$ @, f4 X3 O/ i仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈4 u  I" N( M+ o3 ?! D% V. I
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
5 o9 w# G4 c1 M1 y/ N9 ^3 [( t; a4 K0 E6 d' ]8 D! e2 W

' f' Y# ^( I) L  G% m5 o% w# y% [証據...係要証實左既先叫証據- f& t& [, E& Q3 f% \

2 v4 l7 _1 _. C( K0 Z8 S用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

' g! c* X2 p2 x# V1 b3 f- e3 Q- e. {* Q& [$ b2 M, L  U6 O

) U2 @9 W/ a" F/ Z唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗