jsqaure99

true say, good example.4 e. t' e: g# F
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive." J* N% C+ O% B! j4 \' C
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will." \( t* t$ z, n6 q0 P$ b. x+ K
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
, F' {, ?; K# e# D; g, ]+ k" BNO OFFENCE
9 |+ Z) R' V9 H$ N1 e/ m但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
7 S, K/ m0 o, d' F) c$ t+ K8 ]/ B係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢4 M  D4 |: j0 ]) i; {
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢7 ]" Z4 R) ]6 M8 S9 K
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
# M1 G4 S. f7 b4 D& a. u6 L我唔知
  c( e: \3 q4 @) u3 ~! [( ^* o& I但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐( j8 j9 P2 W9 \; J
會唔會覺得未夠班呢$ Q( J3 H% p/ ]
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附; N/ S/ @$ F% I0 v
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
- \) S8 f$ k8 o& |$ H( n) l+ @) p又點解釋
5 d* C  f" }9 a# J# f! K2 G/ i7 j# P5 W: w/ _
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
8 ]3 @2 t" b) Y3 t以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到5 ^, V0 S" U+ G5 a& x4 a! {. J
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
% F7 p, D, x) f  h* G講得好
3 E, {; p& b3 `0 u5 p# a4 |仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
% g% h' X0 g' o我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:# T2 [9 |2 K# ?" u4 o: }8 {8 p
8 H* N% _1 i1 l/ s7 O
4 A: D2 p; s) W1 R  M! X
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據3 O+ d/ w5 A# s0 q6 f' z
* p. X0 f* C$ o7 }" L& h3 I
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

+ r7 H) V- t: y8 Q7 L6 S

, c% J9 p$ }. y+ A' U6 `3 K% Q: r6 n! d% P" ~
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗