jsqaure99

true say, good example.8 i8 H# i% M; i# ]9 i3 v
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.' O; A! x1 @) K5 x3 Y9 W
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.. D8 l, _, V, j3 I. C
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕" R; p! R$ H0 S/ V: j
NO OFFENCE # @1 G4 _0 S9 }1 Y3 r/ z
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣  ^: l' n1 Z+ [9 x
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢) K9 S) F" g- A, x% q7 Y0 n
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
# m& ]2 s, v2 C% qIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
, G7 j$ x0 B8 |6 ^/ U7 j- m我唔知1 ?( P6 y1 v* Q% V) W
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐6 c4 s2 ^% I4 r5 j  x5 Y
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
% S, u3 v% C2 I3 b5 W0 i人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附/ |& X  r* N0 A% f3 G
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇4 \. x9 A1 b9 e! t; G) p: ]+ f
又點解釋/ D/ y0 R) S, o: o0 |, x+ d. m
! l3 ?9 Z% f2 D1 N9 M& q) F8 s
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
6 E! L2 J  E. r+ E, {以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
! G3 v9 |% [5 S6 s  H家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材/ K4 g- d/ I$ B2 e2 r8 w; O
講得好' k/ C" y' g9 f- |' k
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈6 T2 R# {  B" H# M: `& C, y9 ~
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
' d$ e  f. m+ k0 B$ \, m& G) k6 T$ c* l% y

/ }( N2 J: h6 Y証據...係要証實左既先叫証據5 E* f9 g2 F1 Q" d( N* K  b# u% S
  L$ K6 B6 `$ i: }4 _" ?
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

0 r& P- z; V" }& B! b2 O" t5 I) k& J" B7 \. e

+ T' L8 m- l0 `4 {/ J- e唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗