jsqaure99

true say, good example.
# l* b+ i, ]+ cby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.+ S! F/ e  c$ v0 N. x/ Q" Y/ U
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
, o( _. N/ v& i4 s" W5 ino offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕7 s& ?0 x. b: k6 l1 R
NO OFFENCE
- H$ f* O* r# H5 B但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣, z0 P$ I- j) S  Z; ?* g% F& J" c
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢$ _0 G7 d4 F, C  J0 V: w
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢3 I; S0 P$ `1 E
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢" P( z1 u; o+ k
我唔知
  g5 I$ k  E3 a0 M/ g& b& x但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐6 ]! \. C( l2 K+ S1 ?* I- P
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
& D- N3 O1 ]1 e* K' F* K人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
) s- e" Z. w1 B% C. V但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇' ]# w& L4 K# W& U* _
又點解釋
6 c* ?2 ~  z9 v7 w/ ]
1 b, D$ |' U2 H! Q" T* V( s仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回+ l! ?3 i# _. J. ~, i' y7 I
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到9 i! I- l6 A2 b$ n9 J2 _
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材) V/ a* A- L4 ^
講得好
. ?% c0 |! N, g$ x; J; ?. @# ^仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
. g1 _$ ?0 a& \! S+ n; \5 {. w我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:* r) }' x7 u' P+ ~4 _9 P- Y
. h5 k* K  a$ C( D1 K1 B0 f2 o

, ^8 v5 h3 K3 O6 k/ @証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
+ B/ ^# D1 P4 f) X  K0 s5 U6 V- L* I4 Q
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

" y9 b: F* d, c1 c4 M0 _% @
/ Z9 z: a4 D+ [6 H2 u5 f; L! O+ {
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗