jsqaure99

true say, good example.
( F# C# K/ ~! p  h, Dby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.8 a6 M8 k6 H4 Z9 V
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
* M, j5 \+ q2 a. W5 Xno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕, u* Q: w, X  v, \8 S' z9 y
NO OFFENCE
' h. G- C! ~9 N( t! a/ g# h但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
) f/ |7 f+ Z: Q係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
( p3 ^7 ^/ T" M* B5 I7 B, xIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
& }4 {% i+ i8 t0 q7 D# T, zIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢) l. @4 O3 F* H/ I4 f
我唔知/ }3 P5 w7 M' B; [0 w! G4 _8 o  a
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐% r. y& U0 G( p, Q: a( c. k
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
8 h. O2 M6 j! U人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附1 ^6 J4 a% G7 ^" b
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇+ B* Z' t# h0 f" E8 `! l4 y* o
又點解釋
, x6 H/ V1 ~5 R- i+ ?$ \+ F# A+ g: K- C- @# x* g. e8 ^
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回* x0 E. A, q1 E0 w5 A" w* ]
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
$ i$ h& V+ z% k  h4 p家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
) t0 j3 C) p% e5 h3 {講得好9 R( o, M$ v8 W) ?
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈/ U8 x4 {3 X5 I) ?* }: ]
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:( N- r2 e; _" m+ o' C; x7 X

! t$ V/ z2 B. J/ r
: z( K( r+ M1 i4 X証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
  z" x9 ^& U9 t, D6 N% K: I+ Q6 X7 U  \% j* g2 h3 U& l! y
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

  Q) Y4 u% G7 g, k
% L' B( S, K7 }8 q( b
+ \: ^7 D. h# {/ Z: B( O唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗