coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:0 m6 E% r9 ~! Z
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ ]$ F! H0 {" z" b. X2 m

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:+ z5 A* S3 v9 i( t: ?' N% a
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

& m* `0 C1 A& i4 Y2 ?' Z7 R8 p! e, J參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~$ X2 j" f0 h% |# \, G0 v  a

6 |3 S; a# x* x無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
$ T6 @* H8 ?6 m4 y# ~! g7 Q6 x; M- _. Z% V: Y4 G+ n* u
請珍惜會員戶口!~
# S5 v' w$ h& C% y( t" U# p& h) n2 H* _7 [- \% l! c
2 q) H# e& w7 E0 y

3 P8 W. S) n5 Q$ Y5 ]9 L# {7 K" r# r
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
, y' W% c2 U- M  O3 |我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 ?, ^9 z/ ?0 o

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
# k8 S* K1 {1 C& u& W我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 }- G* [2 ^. _$ S

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
! e% e  B1 [5 b) V" G
; v- p: T" d+ M) S1 L立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。6 j5 n0 D- t' {4 V+ K4 ]
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

. L2 j3 s) E# q# ?" \% g+ T
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
$ d. r" e9 F" h: V5 V& u( f5 {成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~& N% n1 j% Y- n! K& a5 {. S
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~