coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:' q2 Q* \5 L- F$ a4 t6 ^
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 `: J0 W' ]0 x! w3 q& g# U' }

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
; M  F& z8 o( R" O- l我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 d) ?% |( C) I0 h. Z
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~! U' L( b/ b* ~- M6 J' C

$ {: j0 z$ K9 \8 D6 T7 b無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~% W% C# J0 a0 w* O! D& V7 a  F0 J1 e
  f% l9 I& s9 n) e1 S6 O! j+ H
請珍惜會員戶口!~
% c2 T. a2 k9 C/ Z1 W* \; v
. C& @' D7 D- p, ?: N- n. `$ d7 z% K4 E  r) q( J4 o

: K1 G# A, a# k; d9 m: B! E) g5 `- v1 ?" u8 V; w& x5 _) M
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
& N. y1 g/ `3 ]2 h- l5 t我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

* R3 t! R! ?/ W% O, J

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:( m% {( u/ s6 C1 D
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 o. |( U  f; t2 j

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
& S* Y$ A9 T% z4 I- n2 U- e: I0 k! J% t% f% s
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。  q  r1 u8 y  `* U
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

) w9 m' i, ?- H: S- S( x% H2 I- i
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
( f8 m1 \, r9 h- j7 b' D成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~* i! b% I& I  u7 H1 A
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~