coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:$ X. C' l; z- B, B& P( T- w2 d  L
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, o8 H8 |* N* ?, C( x3 b

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:% w) m5 L% a7 V. U( k9 [
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 b$ g3 l: X+ e5 t3 h! g1 s
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
* [9 @9 Z) p: I) u$ [: \- j* U8 Q' Q! R4 R: W
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~) B. R. ?# U& g
1 s1 q! g, K1 z+ g* t
請珍惜會員戶口!~% L2 b+ W& d5 W3 T3 d
! Z* H; U% p) t8 @# `* b. u6 e( A

5 Z! e( c$ a6 i8 i1 ^- E8 T
; C$ n7 j" d" ^, z
1 y% d3 y! [( q( ^8 ^: o6 w講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
. n' s4 ]8 ~9 W, x4 N& [我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; t( T$ i3 J, H' u4 @6 `' Y

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:* z2 H  Q4 C* s$ x: {; I) p
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 O% M7 s. C* k. N4 H

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
% t) p" a' Y. P3 b- R, E
& M" f: [4 _1 a立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。9 n9 \, S8 g4 p) F% Z  E  w. L, j
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

4 o6 F1 z8 @. {3 p2 z* e
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ , r" P( Q) C6 X! _6 a
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~5 {7 ~' l) A" s3 c! X; g) V4 D$ x
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~