coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:- H, k5 ~" d% [# w2 v: u. Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- z9 `0 m( z; y: Y- Y) i# |# O

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:$ B/ ]! J  y$ D2 E! W/ w4 ]% e
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 A% h: t% L# `% e參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
2 c* z, s5 G5 y$ |0 w$ D
8 w  j  [# T( E& P4 T" [無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
, Y9 M7 i+ G1 f. n" `2 l( {  w2 x% Z1 ]9 X# h; c
請珍惜會員戶口!~
1 S* y, ?% C% i3 F. J7 H" V
) D* z/ L0 B' ]  y  G- h  S  V0 A+ U% y( s5 W8 k$ z$ E6 T6 ~6 R

! A0 V% Y6 ^- @) R- @8 O7 \7 n' S7 `5 n- N3 r4 E8 b
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
, j, `0 \; ?/ V" _" u2 A我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; [( E* F2 X8 s1 i  m: F5 [

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:- `, n+ o: z, f) Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" c5 U/ ^& O' ]

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:  w/ L; P2 s, p5 v" _! M; U

2 x) Y, g7 u% n' R立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
+ P# g1 V& K, k6 t! x8 J2 L咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

6 m- w+ i7 m; P呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
" \/ p- M) l- _: p9 ]成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~$ R: U4 g: A; C6 u/ \9 C2 i
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~