coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:& n5 U1 |8 s" C8 m" Y4 A
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; o; @4 X0 G( V7 J

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:5 Z4 [1 |! J. @
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ j% A  H0 k( a" f6 c: r
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~& ~" \$ H' q7 ^3 i
0 w5 b  W1 [& n1 l
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~9 P* L) E$ w" D

6 e! v+ r% S7 j6 u$ v) \6 I) p請珍惜會員戶口!~
4 Y8 {5 K6 a) S
7 E0 Y0 I# p4 h1 m0 u% |' D6 {$ ~- U4 L1 H
4 S8 Y1 {- {/ [3 I4 l2 C

6 ?" L. @# y- R講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( ?% g4 r, Q) I我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

* ^" S: ~9 x; S1 ?

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:' d, X) X; T& i2 A
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, h. l4 I% Q* k1 T# r4 w  A& \

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:6 r2 ]3 B0 Z* E3 n
% T2 @4 k8 Y; b" Y- X4 v
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
. C) G, B& s0 Z咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

8 }7 {9 z) r& e- u. r+ W
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
* X# y) o8 x- [6 m成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
5 I' m* A8 Q, @* R8 C有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~