coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:1 Y5 _6 ?: K2 U1 X8 N
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' N; q2 r. K5 z: g2 Z6 `* E& T

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:: g7 n' Q' [+ S5 I9 C5 n7 p
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ q7 A$ E) C; V  U: l參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~6 `% Q$ z( t! e6 T5 y
1 k% S$ D: ^) p8 _1 ~
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
1 B: f* K6 @% z- K8 ^; v1 ]+ S$ H7 n5 X
請珍惜會員戶口!~1 J* j/ a# j7 p3 n  x6 ]6 T: F
+ _$ l: S+ |. x% s+ l, ^1 N

! T2 D  g- }) |, w4 ?  M1 m  P
3 V3 B* T! x* x2 k/ T- a% Z# ~1 b* s+ n% F% E, h- u
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
8 i  n0 W/ j6 q6 m6 K5 i. ?我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ S7 ~+ C5 E4 V5 P! S- C. ^

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
( }" @  u  P' Z1 R; b9 M  O我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 [1 ~7 |% Q; Q& L; v# j8 R# ~

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:1 B' O" R4 s9 X" Q! o7 e

9 l* \' k2 D4 _立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。6 k# a  g4 D; I3 [1 x2 j
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

/ A1 J$ v: ^& K  A5 K. L呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ % g, i* O" [; J6 Y4 v  g
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~1 V7 [+ W# O) ?7 b
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~