coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:4 y7 m+ Z- Q6 A6 D# r' Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 a* B$ A0 s2 j6 Y% F8 V! o2 }

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:9 R0 R% ]* N) n; b, y+ e
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

7 F1 p# H4 O3 E( c8 E9 R; H參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~2 N; s% A6 j% a) K) G# E4 [; t5 b
( B3 o8 L0 z% Z* J) C' o+ |2 n
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~) C5 q; T: V* a9 R% y+ F- Q
1 ]. r& ^0 M" N, U
請珍惜會員戶口!~
: L$ o  j$ F+ h" L4 I5 ~
) ?6 D; `) B1 ~, e$ @2 m# H9 c: C6 x& U; ?2 v& Q  z! X
) G2 t8 P8 K& A: L, [+ o$ M3 j" w1 V4 X
; F8 t  x) @- e0 b) b7 |3 g* M/ L. |
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
5 ?5 D! d2 r- a# G) E我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; \; u1 U. G9 `( F2 a, R

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
, R4 l* B# u4 ~1 h* R& k我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: Y  X2 U+ Y" x! J

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:+ ~/ @6 \! _! Q) D

+ t$ J, F6 o' K立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
. k/ N4 |9 e  d5 I0 N: j咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

5 n1 J# g" F" O- }/ |
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 0 U6 Z1 Q+ d3 Z" V  r. d
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
3 j3 x& |! @+ W4 x& P有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~