coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:  F1 f0 h6 R" Q# _! g# ~
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 Q! C$ U8 e7 l% }: e

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:) a+ N6 \4 M$ z7 W0 d; ?
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" o# L0 @3 Y- T& k, x" }8 T參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~8 ]& c) K9 e8 X, R
) W- C' ^" w8 t
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~5 z- D. t1 A8 \; M1 x/ j
9 f+ g3 Z4 x. |5 C  z
請珍惜會員戶口!~
( f3 x) b' c" q" p  [: ?* ?
# w! z  l: T& _# O2 l( p6 f# _
" G0 T" N3 v) B+ _
  n4 a9 a- {1 L  m- k2 l# X! K' U& N9 Q8 f: |+ w
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
$ G4 s4 f9 J- X2 |' {- l- p我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 \1 \+ [& E8 }

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:- h, @: n: V% L/ q' U: O* d& M% o
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

* F2 ]) j( l& D9 Q% P' d. S

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:  x, n  s  g# x; N, z* _3 m  @9 |+ O

6 L5 e* ~" }- U" |* f, d. p1 j立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
8 r+ |) l0 C* t1 x/ F咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

; b7 a. }8 z9 Z% w
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
0 V! Q2 V$ S: Z# f! M7 @: \: s成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~1 l+ h8 M+ ?' t
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~