coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
4 J6 @) q  J* Z我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- ?' M. t' ]' j5 Z' O

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:7 X+ Z6 G1 g  Y5 s9 X, Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- X$ v0 x/ f- a; a參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~- A! {) k2 w* n3 C/ L8 M( ^) i
% P, B" h% a2 H! B% c6 p7 c
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
/ F; ]$ A( v  t0 Y6 z
! M3 R/ e9 F7 V& I' U7 o9 r- \7 [請珍惜會員戶口!~( N7 p- i4 g8 o" y+ B# }% N

5 v/ Z+ S. A! R& v) ~# X- G. A& E1 J: \; X

  v, O2 \* N7 P% I" \9 T) K  a# C6 b1 K# i7 f4 t* |  p: G; m
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: x1 {* R0 |' i. e6 T9 [8 n我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 A" Q4 V6 d1 Z& S. r

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:% T. E; Q, x% K. v9 q7 a
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

7 W5 E' [: ~8 b* Z) m. A8 H. C9 B. ]

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:) q% q# P( {6 _
' f7 T+ ^7 ^; e% o% a$ Z+ ^: p! i2 o
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
9 ]( L+ @4 J4 Z, t  H# z咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

  l; N$ e" q$ v
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
" ^- w) {) x. S; @/ o" t4 d% y6 b成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~( J% i' m3 j: {9 a
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~