coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
; ~. K1 u9 ?5 ~, ]我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ o4 l  }( ^8 w7 K" R, N

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:4 ?8 A2 j! t) \# ^+ B
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: j4 u- N( [1 \. f# w" ~) B" C7 A2 `
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~8 ~! i9 F$ a) O. z6 a

3 |  m$ {6 F2 _無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~1 m! f' ]4 I: b, H' |2 B" }
+ f& L! K5 d" b* C* U
請珍惜會員戶口!~! R  b" e1 z0 i/ l  I# |( Y

9 y' A8 s/ F; u( y6 H
2 x8 j) u6 x7 H) x% J/ X
# M# @- T* t* T0 t* x. o1 t- v1 S/ n+ l- @4 f7 }# p8 b
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
% S# b& q+ N6 O! a我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 ~) H6 O! _  |9 A! \0 s

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:0 ^# Y; g( T  q- c% `8 |( ^. o
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: l) H% m/ G4 L# C$ E# M

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
& ^4 G# _6 B; |) r2 `  x1 H1 V/ t6 L) l- G' m1 F  J+ h2 X
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
2 C7 J* g5 p& v. f' u4 R5 W. {咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

1 ?2 \: l( k. e/ v# T' i呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ , z9 t7 O. V/ D; a6 l0 H' |, C, `
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~, V" e9 O" I3 O
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~