 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:. h( j; ] @9 c' w+ ?
$ \0 x7 ]% C3 q% n* y: A, F! @+ z3 E1 n. p+ D) i: h
同意.
; V' l3 S& J1 z; r. W但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 2 u, S- r! W; O" p2 S; ^: ~5 C0 d4 m/ X& o- G c8 s+ s
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
; P e' u1 \2 p# AYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students& m5 ^4 m0 q8 V5 `" |( j4 g
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.$ o' G2 d+ x0 H* B9 s* z
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
7 }' B) h7 q( T% I4 j1 s, n C
/ @& E8 B4 }; O6 s1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law. A4 a9 ^8 B1 Q2 w0 ~6 w4 F
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper1 b$ D; L/ R+ I& q
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published1 F$ f& `4 T; C' ^8 r
6 W, k, @% j( y$ fThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|