|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:0 b7 J- u. j# N
/ H# G8 O4 r3 R& u
2 R# t5 H7 n( d' o' g- S ~
同意.
0 a" y! ~) S- u$ N1 v# F! c但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... $ S# W* t7 y2 j5 }" u
, M% x2 M0 H: N& z
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.& Y- A6 O, d; K1 U$ U) K$ o6 G
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
6 q* M- h3 s9 X; mI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
! ]6 q3 n* m. t( }! J. e3 J) W- WAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
$ q0 u, `+ H' e- @
$ c' T; z% e0 R6 z |+ _1 y1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
/ } A" ~. B% \% P o6 \2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
8 G# ^" m6 r$ L Q3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published" {7 v) w0 Z. g0 R" R' A. _
$ {, b0 z9 v" B3 pThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|