|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
! O1 |$ R1 d Y$ Q7 E c( L J. s5 A8 e0 V
7 E- [0 D% K; \( L; i/ g- \4 X
同意.- x6 M' `9 K& g2 W4 ]* N0 V
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 2 k. Z8 E7 c, `: K% k5 G
2 c1 t6 E- X0 Q$ @+ N% `
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
6 m) ]# Z* Q' g" z' EYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students) s, P. ?' B5 V
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.- d; V0 S5 C1 A
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
) r8 o& `6 B; \" y* l# S, m) r! g% r+ U) K* n/ }% @1 `
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law: ~, \+ L5 _1 b; u
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper* W' p, X I5 {: r. ]1 }8 Z6 j
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published# b3 d0 T8 n3 M+ U6 n6 E1 B) O
8 ? G3 Z, |+ K/ M4 [0 O& GThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|