 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM: f+ U; q( {% V3 m' _7 }
2 R. p* ?% t6 e5 e1 @( w& b
* o4 t7 }/ F2 p同意.8 F+ Z% V/ A0 o/ P, k! X
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ; f8 \! {( a+ I% u3 z' U4 \% A
( \# M' A' e2 _7 C& K/ hI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.$ Q3 t8 V2 R* \( ^# |0 ~
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students5 c$ o' Z( u# V( X, k" M. E
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
/ T1 A8 W+ b4 k( j% |2 t+ i) uAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.8 s8 O$ t6 k$ C, d# l
3 X4 g$ c" E& y0 P) V
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
+ F4 A% D e, ^: S" v; Y6 O2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper- [7 c. M6 M6 ^' v* O, D- T
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
+ p! `! i. l5 B: j+ s! p4 U
m5 p# S9 z/ s( k( l( XThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|