|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:) Y% N, t7 e$ n v; \% \. X/ I
# I: B+ x |# u4 R
1 M9 Q v; g ~5 W同意.
8 b: ~ t; H/ b& Q! _7 e% _但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... % o' B# f) e; @6 K
; y! c0 J+ g! g% h' L2 {I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.) u5 {/ h; Q% P1 `6 U6 y
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
. M8 }# x) s1 ]7 x# v) G$ DI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.' q1 h i% y( W: v. x, P
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
& `$ w) g8 q0 d% D) ` n7 Y6 r% k3 N0 D: b' }
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law/ F- q3 b8 \. v) ]6 ~/ K8 M0 h
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper- d$ f6 l# i) s3 F- [( _
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published0 v" q* ?( K: H+ G) m+ i
# G9 W. P/ F; l% @4 F
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|