|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
8 w2 A" W6 E5 f
2 s6 B( T( I1 f5 \$ p4 n9 W$ f7 T: {$ c2 S# N8 A
同意.4 v* C- L4 i8 a0 h
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... * Y6 B5 _" N4 s& U
- G4 T* D1 o% o6 tI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
; E3 J- ]8 K1 n# VYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students- F' S" s' l% i: ]: }& ]
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.# |$ @* O& e L$ d
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
: l6 j* R: @, V; X/ g. D) ~) d- w# l. R
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
' A; U T, h1 Q8 N* K6 i$ W2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper R, L6 Q H& w0 i( M2 F2 }
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published5 o* ^: S, ^$ n9 m
: K9 w9 m) s4 b$ K. j
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|