kakueeken

Originally posted by wai214 at 2005-3-25 01:10 AM:
its team sport....
Shaq can't do much without Wade
MJ can't do THAT much without Pippen
Kobe has no one else to play with...
if T-mac and AI are in the west, I don't think they can single hand carry the team to the playoff either ...

我唔太認同, o'neal 當然係需要一個好拍檔, 但果個唔一定wade。

O'NEAL + PENNY 可以打入NBA FINAL,
O'NEAL + KOBE 奪下3連冠, 重建湖人王朝,
O'NEAL + WADE 極有可能是本季東岸常規賽冠軍

O'NEAL 才是那個奪標中不可或缺的要素, LAKERS 只著眼於O'NEAL 的年齡才放棄繼續以為核心,造成今季的結果。我成日覺得, 舊年直接同 KOBE SIGN & TRADE 換 T-MAC 唔係較明智咩?

唔係話 KOBE 唔好波, 不過大家都知 NBA 之中, 近年來內外線人材供求嚴重失衝, 好似O'NEAL 呢個級數0既中鋒真係有$ 都買唔到。

[ Last edited by kakueeken on 2005-3-26 at 12:18 AM ]

kakueeken

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-3-26 12:22 AM:
我覺得又唔好咁快判Kobe死刑
睇多一季先啦!

其實我0既意思係同 O'NEAL 搵拍檔, 易過同KOBE 搵。
KOBE 再勁, 都需要同他有番咁上下份量0既拍檔先得‧
而家呢個陣容無論打幾耐, 都唔會係冠軍。
不過 LAKERS FANS 可以期待下 KG 係WOLVES 受夠,
想轉投一支 "有奪標機會" 0既球隊。

kakueeken

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2005-3-26 12:28 AM:

其實，T-MAC肯夾明哥，唔代表肯夾O'neal，事關明哥就得人係NBA出名既，相反O'neal同Penny、Kobe都有不和紀錄....

都有道理0既, 況且而家都唔係 T-MAC 肯夾明哥,
係明哥及其他綠葉肯輔助他。
他真係未必肯咁遷就O'NEAL, 正如當日唔想係表哥陰影下打波咁。