奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: m3 ?) q1 N' x( q2 F$ d
; j. K' C: k: ~! Gagree,
# v! u" `+ c  |我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,, o- D! N1 M) U7 ], \! }
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
7 \  W4 i4 ]: \* p, H" `期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; Y( x. X5 `8 N/ v& x" _( bhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
9 x  d9 t1 t3 T- C$ j已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
0 T! Q; a9 J# X: ?, l& v, q搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
. |/ Z/ h& E0 T+ j2 D0 j4 [Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:9 f! i6 c3 \3 f/ ]0 a/ Q4 x
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
; x6 N! L4 K4 r' N( [1 `: C, K0 I6 T" o! J% z4 P+ J+ m3 N
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???5 h" c" f5 s0 f6 c6 Z, j/ F+ ]+ ]" [$ p
  h  m; m' V/ Y
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ g# p  {( S. R" u2 U0 Y) o+ P$ q8 c8 [& l' W2 x- E3 V
絕對支持啦
: T2 \( z! b8 w
4 I+ Q8 B5 x+ J  x有錯就認,打就企定' ?# l) `6 }! T/ R% X0 \2 E
" ]. P3 d0 s$ U$ {% U
無錯當然要撐到底! }/ W/ U! u3 X+ G% [+ B) j; x
. \- |! I" \  W4 ?) G) [
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 y) N# k' z- G% d' t* J; ^, f7 x8 r! j8 b0 d8 {$ D: N# r/ C8 W
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得/ A& D$ x( Z8 u9 p9 s' n
) \% g! G6 N) v7 r
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力; ^+ R/ M. H/ M# X* j6 K
% |2 |2 V  q; b" p) f# I
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
$ i5 j* _6 ^- _8 _/ c  O+ w4 x' q! l& w
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  J+ }' j0 L8 c% t2 u+ u$ h

% w5 @- ~! s* }6 d; F. I我唔認為lor
+ |$ V' T! k% J( C2 X) h/ F& s: x
唔係話要整死佢地
) \0 c4 l' \" i; C. o0 _3 e4 T! {+ j4 J" W9 |2 s' c4 |
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  u6 t1 d# u# j8 c. Q
' B( H7 ?( |  p% ]4 i6 x7 Y# v我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
2 b% l  Z5 O2 T% o, I3 _
. Q) @8 C0 Z8 |1 K3 C+ E4 _5 {7 b6 Q有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
0 C' r& ^8 e* b+ _3 A: n7 X  @$ P( B
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由3 Y$ T- R  e+ g2 j$ U: H& l

* A1 _! h; D7 i- }5 R大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
6 C2 r* i- X/ `/ Y4 b5 |9 E+ a"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") d$ J7 o- Z4 `* S4 Q

/ L1 x0 g0 }: Y* E' a* O8 \7 O我們的大學生) T" T) @, S# w. D1 ], \) Q

0 i& x: r, L0 b: l/ M. Z/ y3 Z7 {7 H/ |- j! J' s) p

' N9 \9 Y3 I3 R( R9 E+ L+ O& x1 n4 E

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:) c$ Z) J1 y; c5 b5 \

. Q1 R; i- t& X9 h3 d/ M# w* x, d; G
有見地 !!!
0 R: D; r5 q6 P% d/ K! L; R! s4 U現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 e  `# x/ [$ B& E5 A
1 i8 @5 [( n5 z4 p  c+ O' wI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
: ]* B+ j6 J" f  z. p6 _! tI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 O% j0 E5 }1 \' r
I pretty sad that about the University official.5 ?% {6 |5 _( N5 K) l% E, a9 m
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
( K9 X  r$ d9 s- X: a# g# a% l! P: |" }
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
# @7 r+ N% s! K- h- T我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! J) O3 i9 B8 U9 q3 D- E5 ]8 l
" }# V* w' A2 v9 }
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* D$ ^# b7 d% A' S
% R/ z3 B5 W4 e3 J) r0 L& q兩者有何分別?
( j0 p1 I, G) e6 H5 d中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?