奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:" W- _3 h4 P, j- j4 C* _
% }- Q  ?6 V  ^7 E
agree,$ }/ V" n2 f; r  q4 }
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
8 T' o" H- J9 U( E/ B+ l$ n' o7 w1 L但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,) z" U% F! [' S, o
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% q5 f" h4 Y! l5 c+ E# ]
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 k; J. v1 [( t已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地- h: D* f& c+ b# D- X
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.$ l5 f1 F7 T: y# f- `1 O
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:# ~: K: Z: }2 X& P; n" j
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ) d9 C3 m3 e' L; l2 l; G
2 b2 D- [8 m- L' P6 k' V5 v
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
3 B7 j- z6 {' J! d5 l0 A7 p& V# F
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

# b' q3 ~1 p  {
& K. Y; \8 C; R7 ~/ W絕對支持啦' ~9 i6 L0 F, [5 h3 w. v9 v7 P# m+ y/ ~

6 q5 V4 A% E$ l7 |* P6 P0 d有錯就認,打就企定/ r6 X3 y: R1 d9 O% s
- Y% F! K- W9 ?6 |
無錯當然要撐到底
* |2 C- j+ G5 ?0 W( K8 A6 q; p& n$ V3 p( W3 ]& j
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
" _$ `* F+ K* _
4 ~; G& X9 H! k2 O" G在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得5 G: H# n8 t! p' M4 ~! l* k& G

9 g0 K* V$ d' u; J一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
+ J6 i/ N- O6 F+ p* t' C* ~, [3 t% g# ]1 Y3 v  l& ]6 [  Q5 j3 I8 d1 v
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
8 Y2 w8 b! v4 `5 l" E0 C' }
* u9 S2 K( p! O8 O) f, ?% Q唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
. V6 m) e* m6 Z6 i, s$ |- ]! Z5 n5 O0 s' G
我唔認為lor
  J. Y# U0 m) e4 e3 M( ], \/ O8 W7 T: V+ t
唔係話要整死佢地
% `: G& m# \* f) k. R* x1 o4 f4 c- C; r/ w  R$ j6 y
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
5 p/ v* w5 b% Q: t- I2 {3 X
5 V4 B+ v7 j* z6 m8 }6 z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
* y& H0 s% C7 Z# E# K9 p( a$ \" v0 {. q- ~& h0 r. c4 y+ m
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
) `( R4 B- n9 v/ v7 D5 t$ w
% w8 Y6 N! t, L0 ]6 n( m7 M: G$ y6 |唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由' T2 a) E5 _# D* k, B; g. u+ F

% O" J& o. Y; c# |  }大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句  g$ v- m0 E. x
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
7 K/ f  _, B7 X( S
# T5 U0 m* [. e我們的大學生4 Z3 d5 `& Q. Q4 y& ^

6 [+ |# p) X- Z% c. x3 k: ^" q* K! U7 q  r( p
1 k) c1 q. r. q& s! }. U; G

" a# K- r, E; d/ U

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:/ S; H  S* x1 i7 _; f9 Y8 H

; W( P; c" ?" y( B5 {3 O% P1 [& c9 Y2 u# q
有見地 !!!
3 m- T+ v2 }  J  e+ P現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  p, p/ D1 `) N) E1 O
/ y; U6 J; s. f3 I9 S7 S
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
7 E! ~0 y5 q1 g; `# y6 [+ e2 yI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 8 ?8 e+ `' r, X. C+ ?, G8 S. r0 ]
I pretty sad that about the University official.
) u8 h) g1 z0 q( o# f8 iIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: b8 p& I0 u5 t% W" }4 S

$ t0 r1 `3 P( ]: E4 a6 _5 v[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:) j- u# t3 ?, \& y( g
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; v- ^- ^  o6 H; p

& o+ a  [/ y1 B( j' T" ^8 X+ s$ }[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 A; G  ]) u5 h  A
+ e: a8 a. }! a2 ^6 S' \兩者有何分別?
$ n9 \3 O' M# h( g中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?