奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
7 L2 C3 l# E0 w, e/ ]! D2 K" M4 W% H/ {9 y$ t7 U- U, y: x, |
agree,4 W& p# Z2 f8 @$ a
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,8 B& |9 K( U4 I# M
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,8 s5 X; T' b! O2 ~  p
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* P$ ~# J8 q4 n7 _0 l
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html6 f  O* v3 J: v. {0 l) S3 n
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
/ M1 u4 D9 h: U: B- W搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.* l. M5 M5 G, C
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:6 q! B* x# k1 r; M1 a. s
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ; \& |: ]. [: J+ j$ x& J5 x/ \# k

" h) i7 l' _% P% Q1 Q$ N, n% w- V係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
/ _: Y8 N+ F% e
  J' V9 m* o' a% \+ j為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( w  s( H* X  H6 W7 k( ?
/ }1 b( \5 M  n& i+ T
絕對支持啦
+ U" s+ O. k8 |' r/ K% r, {2 Z  D" L* }$ Y1 a) R- j+ R) e: X* w
有錯就認,打就企定+ B5 P' N& x7 P) w! Z1 q( j
5 s( ~5 I) v) x  G  c0 V2 @5 k
無錯當然要撐到底  |' W# n( Y' W& W& N
5 h5 p& [  ~% Q) l0 F
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
# T, N' x/ _6 F8 b2 k; H0 b3 w, w0 V" X
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! c' b! P" G' H0 y
, x  ^+ j( g: }+ [7 ~  |( t7 w8 \
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
9 q- S$ i0 n6 `# n' C& _6 g3 J
2 v1 U" u# N4 G# H1 j我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
1 t7 x' F8 A5 i" Z
* ^4 G- S4 {7 _, D  o唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?8 p) H( A( L: C$ u1 a3 H( G
0 b8 j, b5 v3 y* s2 G, Y' t
我唔認為lor
+ [& T: Y' V8 _8 p& t. E& r! E% _+ R  [1 u- ]6 \. m2 \
唔係話要整死佢地
1 X, M3 ?" `/ b3 d
3 M2 h/ X8 r6 o* v- K5 L$ y, A! x# O2 O而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 d' O' q& E2 j) g' H! [
) W/ y8 b. l8 M4 K& C6 P我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大8 `) L6 |6 a: u  U4 H
* O: W* `0 N/ |6 b
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的  ]  P; W# c/ U; G! E7 n

, Q, W4 E7 s7 H6 z3 `( }/ |唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
  Q3 l0 p* D9 F4 B2 Z3 K' O$ B5 Q: N2 c0 [1 |$ Z
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
8 J' y- N# j' I+ T"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"* K+ [& r: j+ m* L- l

% f7 o& K$ U. R0 Y: l我們的大學生, M2 B! \0 m9 U5 l& N
; i' O9 q8 D) ^2 Y( T7 a# P' K/ w
0 ]6 f3 |  ^6 K% Y: K
) c1 \* A' X# p$ T* I

% H# o9 A* Z3 ?! U) h- H; G

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:( J, d+ _$ X" @" F# @+ S) p
/ J2 }7 i2 q9 N0 h8 n
' p5 `& K! |$ ]$ f
有見地 !!!4 L, d$ V4 M" R9 f# q
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' H' P+ |! i+ c0 ^
3 Y4 S2 v/ R1 r
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ' r8 R4 \  R$ `7 t
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 s3 `( e% e" {" l
I pretty sad that about the University official.
& l0 ^4 a9 V3 oIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, G6 A* f' w( x" B* z' X3 |& u
" |+ W2 E# v  H# n[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% k8 ^* Y. ~; U我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
& }+ C2 e5 p/ }+ t! A+ v, u' o# f6 H6 |. S" R
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  l4 {# F" o. v% I1 ]

  k; i- A8 o. N# ^( k* N' ]6 q' I兩者有何分別?
& g4 Q) P8 k- Z% @1 Q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?