<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
3 V/ u$ e" K) b但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:: t; y6 W! e2 z6 }" Y
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
- p* i4 b$ F1 D
I agree you points that it could be illegal0 F# y" u) C9 I# n" O
but that is still a "gray area"' a' p. `* r3 j; `2 y3 G  A
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair  N1 a0 V% K2 j2 w
' ?9 Z! H4 r5 V' _5 e( g! V# A1 x1 E
anyway, I want to say that is) Q1 j- l. a3 M: ^& R3 U) A  S
who is supposed to be protected by laws- Y4 `6 l8 }+ g
creators?6 `2 E5 n6 K# J! |/ u
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market4 H: s+ y" I: v
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.0 F' C1 L. D0 S% Q
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those8 _: W% v8 s! O, y( M* U
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:; H' i, _; s7 m
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 g- u3 E3 M6 g- b7 k我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
+ h! `' K( W0 q9 P' c% z" }9 y( v3 G& g2 q: c
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- S  C$ |+ z6 I: [- Y6 Q
唔係喎!" s, l! t  l5 c* z2 V
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) I; J% L; F8 w% A. R+ e/ N' B我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
- @& i( j- D3 z& P  M佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!, D* U# F  Z8 x. W4 o2 [% @$ k
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
7 P# \7 F( C& L# V' M- }一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
: z' R6 Y* ]' C4 X3 ~, x9 S6 j. udun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
! O6 h. s$ E2 P9 l% G8 A9 }8 dif so bad, dun download la, right?$ ]4 z; a: V# i; d$ c7 a/ O7 j
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^/ v: ~/ X) b; X- I! o3 {6 J
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
% N" y5 f# R' g. l; _" w7 @no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la4 ~! \% c1 v5 p7 i- J" U" D
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
  x! ^  }0 I/ U, kusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
7 |& k6 p$ X" L; i9 xwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!# u" d# z" x& O8 z( z" N& G
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!6 x8 H) s# u- M% ?6 u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~( Q: y. S# H# S! t% A+ D) r6 M
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
3 S' r- o0 Y+ @, `錢就一定罰$ T# k; l7 X* `# t* }- H
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,; S9 ~9 v) y9 U, @/ C
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 W' o! p" B4 Q( D; r佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
8 m" X; {" n/ b7 t到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。