奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:) Q) e' k( h0 b6 B% U

% q4 d3 F3 D4 ?agree,
. J* a# x! M1 _1 r5 \, @- d我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
( W# V( V/ I1 b: e& E$ G; {% M但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,( V) g- h8 \. R* a" [0 c
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

9 J" A) @* c; B% T' o, \- I* {, {. j) Y' @# jhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
9 G. w9 d  z5 w4 A% U7 w0 Z7 `8 I已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地* s3 z4 D7 a& G* i( ~/ N
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.' u$ A- |4 W  ]/ {' d2 m/ B9 }
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:1 b' g7 n: r+ P$ Q  r$ L& e! e% d
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 2 K. X3 j, ~4 p( ^! ^3 x* a

, g& N1 l, }3 A# n$ q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???7 v4 I* }% v+ {4 E9 n
* |0 u% @! U  F
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) s1 t2 G& Z$ V3 I0 ^! |, c! P

7 O2 {) A0 q/ |0 J# b絕對支持啦2 h4 A6 V2 T/ O4 D9 P$ E
# s3 p) D7 v4 H+ m3 f0 |  D
有錯就認,打就企定
: [2 `8 h7 Z! {, ?) U
8 y8 u5 H9 \* K6 |* {5 s& D) u無錯當然要撐到底+ ~: v- O2 M9 K# Y, S7 k& f* e

8 Z+ Q9 v/ ]$ `0 q但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩. k4 w4 z5 m0 u5 E& _" \" p+ B
3 Y) J  J4 h7 E- X9 K& q2 ]. z7 {3 Q, d
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 S. r% m' I9 R& K7 @3 {6 R

8 W  S% h5 J+ o+ e4 \6 ~一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 K9 L" V& k, k( x0 m: U" [4 f. ^) ]) w

  M, b. I4 h5 X' O我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生! j* O  j0 ~" N, u0 x2 J

6 c5 E4 J0 D! X6 R0 S- A唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
& D$ [3 p3 }+ u. H3 @$ S+ b3 C# A6 u0 O  j7 a4 c
我唔認為lor
6 I0 H: M9 w: }0 r4 N& j& t% K/ R% K* ?1 B
唔係話要整死佢地' z8 H* u7 z  U  F* _
. b, J! q% [7 K: @- k2 Y
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用" j: d' c3 e3 b$ ^- ]- Z
( c" ^; k+ w2 m7 y3 t
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
0 T& {! \$ }# k# R6 _2 x8 L- Z/ t1 R+ q6 B5 y& K
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
* s, ]1 O! J" X& Q2 b) F/ F' U: M" k( d- x
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
2 X" t  d) p. b. l5 `7 m) Z6 k2 `; E- g
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句0 O& m2 U0 N, ?' C- Z& z4 _1 G
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
$ l+ G$ v$ `' Y, k- {
! }# i- q- N4 S% u# M4 t' I, v我們的大學生
& G7 I7 R" Z# O6 [% ]  d! f" K4 Q8 w/ |! d9 B+ ]' B; k; c

. O/ V% @, m/ }# q- Z
7 i1 ~5 x- [$ t1 W  f- O0 T8 R) W" A. x/ c

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
2 o' q  `; K1 ~7 U% m* e1 }
( S" E% E* g. i- J( w
( E1 i: D5 A% B6 b- S: v* m0 a有見地 !!!  g& U0 m# T) H+ v( `7 A' {, q
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 M7 S! Q; h! H, }/ c, j3 W: N& j- V8 [5 ^9 q, J7 h) V" a2 r
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
, A4 `/ |4 G' `; w/ |  q0 n' bI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
, @' t- h, G- |9 P/ @+ H3 Z( XI pretty sad that about the University official.* F/ Z( c% x9 `3 }) A3 X7 V
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la( \( }( q3 c' ^: n- ?" m
/ m0 K$ g! }9 b! A$ W
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:+ W1 ]# g9 }0 V0 ?% X# a- {
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ [4 @: Y6 `) o$ X  w
2 b9 u6 ~* |' s  I9 P8 G* e[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. P, I' E* s( J: M5 G& V: z7 j
/ P8 X# B! T/ M3 ?9 g
兩者有何分別?
9 A8 m' ]% r% \! z中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?