Rika

由最好排到最壞
8 ?* h% v( `, B6 i0 nF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
; j0 d) `+ d  ^5 G/ ?3 oB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount) _+ C! R! G' X
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& c  B7 C5 u' q8 V$ W! u! jM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
0 @/ r( S8 f6 k3 a1 q; c2 k  u* jL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:9 }; L' Q5 b  i! i$ G' J6 k

- ?4 N6 C4 x# c, q) z4 HM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
7 ?1 [+ f. Q7 ?3 E* @! S
4 }, {: T6 F: i6 ?$ P/ tS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)+ {3 B( X. n3 Y( M; z& F& g$ _* O; {
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
/ U) e; b( v0 B
" O: c( l, K3 A$ BB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做: [$ A) A3 r$ C, v+ b+ q) z/ j

( S" S( E8 A5 g1 a7 V) B1 tL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
5 @* I7 c0 l* e" L3 x& n0 l$ S0 ?' h
9 j  a7 B7 W# ?; ^/ V- wF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
5 ?. O* z. n( ?     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 L! A* M4 _- g
- z1 J7 X# @3 g6 ~& w" v# J
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案+ O, W4 }  B, f- `' O
而家答多次
. v) ^: @0 j  B9 F3 l$ Rf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽+ D4 S6 `- |  d( O2 @9 i
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架3 I) B  [8 O4 Y" m  |! c4 Q
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) S! m3 _+ n6 \# u' I' [, y
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願., m- o8 j5 }! Y5 h( s/ t' }* a% V9 x
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
" r8 J. N" y+ V0 i, H( u$ G5 e2 {: x4 r( v$ B# q  u  R
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
  S* N* x; G0 |% K) z5 @$ h$ BF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
) M4 v+ Q+ Q/ E7 _7 ?, wM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' d9 l9 Z" E5 l
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
5 U1 w' |0 D3 o3 j! }B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. ?8 D1 g* c; @* g. q( KF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
6 C$ X: k" |; h0 Z# U6 z. wS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
& l! y) y1 }/ m1 |) @9 BM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法! `! n, V% j( _- g/ i
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 j, q+ u# j1 h7 NB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情3 j; \5 b6 l5 u3 y
5 X, N. a) N# F* f# g$ j
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:0 b9 m) Y. G+ D/ L/ \
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
1 n3 ~3 G  Z& [, }" G# sB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
2 D* w, f+ N' d( X# iS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件* Q# F5 S( B! R# U
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方9 ?3 q/ t6 r+ X* W) M# c3 f. G
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 C! `/ [1 @- a2 p( |. v6 @
. L/ p" S$ p9 o- h8 @ same choices with u , but want to add some comments 3 L! p" Y3 f5 d+ T$ v9 F  h$ ?
* Y1 N, j( G1 Q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& V: v# b$ ?( ~" U: q% l  X
  c- L$ A9 R( ]% n! x4 z  tS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
9 k! ^# w: ^6 ^4 W3 a
: K) E9 U3 t2 y8 Q9 \: yF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
6 Z2 M9 Q6 h- C8 s( p$ \4 @9 e9 {: ~" D* b( v5 Q
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 n; z4 J9 e7 y; y( m; |

4 T( b! _, B9 Z0 R+ A% P! L  F[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 \! J8 M" Y7 n! q  s
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' Z) D7 J; Y1 H3 u( r5 m/ s! qL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
/ ^$ v5 y/ z( ^* ]% xF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ q7 z5 z4 \+ l7 \

9 q- n" ^# m1 X9 A2 d最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, ~4 l/ A, {* t# g/ G" O/ a有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
' e) a4 k6 Y* e2 L6 ]由最好開始排起既話，
  e$ j0 m0 k) I$ y3 o# m( NL B M F S 啦，3 E3 a) B8 s2 F7 `2 e
/ u7 y: w  L, L0 ^8 U
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- o) @+ X: T1 ^5 R# C
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？7 r: p* z; O6 Y) u
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
; D; ?( X0 E6 }  o. h& X% y又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
; {3 R  ]2 L% E' O1 j  b/ k
* U) W, S; H* W) R! P" R而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，' `/ p+ c- n1 d' e
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
. g7 P/ D0 u+ ~, q9 y明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. Z% [* a7 C. f, c; b( @
& u4 A0 D3 S+ l: Y( O) N而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ `2 a+ P4 k' f5 C
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  ?( w( R; N  g3 Q亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，2 {- m- H: S& ]+ o1 C: t
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，# Z# [" L3 r9 W* p) U0 U
M 都可算壞了。
; c( S  I+ L+ T  W3 E6 L$ Z* Q: L4 p6 f
F 呢個人仲掂，
/ N2 w& o3 l5 ~5 [9 q/ w( z3 P知道既唔等於要講，
+ i9 B7 |8 F! e2 I! i如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
! |1 P: B3 K0 @4 b. E. O我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。1 D2 V5 D5 J" o
4 P2 b( _: m' g4 }5 u
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
9 y" u, ^3 G  D- u始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ i$ z. E3 F& p% R4 ]* r
! `5 a0 X0 K% X) X
$ a. G/ W, a" N) J& n% S
+ ~: d) t: Y$ a/ ?
題外話：/ }# r) I8 r* {/ t  `
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! }. I6 k" E: u- Z+ L* o睇到 S 呢條友，; C" u9 s- a3 F+ g. y* E; F
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
8 B: ]( B5 l& S
9 s3 Q! C  `, I6 ^' V1 CS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!" `5 r& s$ ^( Q
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ {. ~4 a/ m; Z& X* |" D0 JM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
+ Q9 N/ a! I5 nB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害9 g! O& q' A) y
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...