Rika

由最好排到最壞8 H/ j! k! U9 U  t' z
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
+ `* E( j4 I- @1 u# H3 ^! M$ \6 G+ MB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
- |% H2 S6 E: ^$ ^2 F* |  tS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her1 R# ]& q- n3 l& A5 T
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure6 Y+ g3 d6 X: s
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
8 I, `/ L/ }* g" M* L1 _' P
" K6 V9 R; c& G+ V* r7 h$ T3 PM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ u1 w( I$ j4 M
2 C0 _6 G2 N5 R# P2 w" I
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
: |+ j. U) @3 {7 v     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!2 Q# B  |  B; b7 @
9 `5 ?  L/ n1 |
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
( Z' p$ j( r$ P# J7 O' k8 k& b# j0 z; b  r' Z
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
5 p- }: J' `( |; b2 t5 x
- v# Q5 R; D( X1 J$ jF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
& Z, u- V9 c1 Q5 w$ ?+ v     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好6 Y; B7 L+ O- c9 M

2 m1 ^0 P6 A+ T$ c$ Z[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案' {: U- e/ ~0 h
而家答多次
6 t7 h. G0 y) ^6 g: \9 x8 u2 Af: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽3 }) ^: B8 A2 x" k$ X' v
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架/ u2 J# l! U$ S2 U
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢0 g" l6 B4 X- G4 h' ]. J. a& k, N
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.; V9 ?. W/ g& B4 Z# h+ i6 C) k  u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 l* y* x' M( R( T" ]* Y1 N
8 U/ g, Z9 Z* c6 X+ I2 X
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大9 x7 z& W( Y& i& g
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
8 G) o8 F  I0 g0 h" R5 lM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒- l7 N! B( g7 v' l" a0 I2 U' d& ~9 d
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
2 O6 j& H+ A: _B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! F5 L) H" @1 j; d
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默". |5 j9 }' R1 c2 o) `
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 B" a, }( ]( A& ~, w9 i# bM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- E! e" Q( e% L/ d* V6 O) \% g
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
: q6 X& Z$ X" |8 TB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情* ?4 m" i) d0 h+ c$ W: y/ K+ M
; @% f7 j& z/ F" p1 |; ]
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ M7 _; Z, Z  a/ i% J9 h. h
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己0 [; Y$ T8 z# U9 M+ \, m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
7 f" }3 ~% ?1 Q) o6 M( IS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件5 Q- \8 K& p) f+ @
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; D$ W/ s" L- G& w! e  ?
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% r- O4 h: B! x- a
5 `: z1 G8 N4 k* O; g same choices with u , but want to add some comments
  a% x+ g+ A0 q1 c7 t9 a* x
% H7 u, S% K, y( i: H/ H0 G9 DB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ M# _, p" ~4 f1 }' S/ S1 c: O' w, T+ M( L
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
" o# B; J' ~0 Q+ F/ C7 k- g2 p- ?1 k2 Z) A( O
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: X2 m: `: p! |4 f$ e% T) {3 [! y2 {/ ^' W
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" M& c% R' s/ S* m7 a) R, M* }
6 l9 q& q" P2 a4 ~; U
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
- ~0 O# j% T1 Z, t' _2 Q# SM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
& A+ v" D6 d, P% e0 a4 YL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; W7 v  A4 H5 g# d
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
  y. m) ?0 y7 `- S3 ?! ^& ^) y: L' U6 A  C3 T9 K" M+ X3 o  A
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽...." l2 i6 ?$ V6 h/ X0 ?' A8 N! a% c
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
+ Y8 Q& k, n' w$ \. Y; ^由最好開始排起既話，
7 g& }8 V: A7 n$ D: _5 Q3 tL B M F S 啦，
% u- ]- S. t$ F6 L2 M1 P) T
3 ^8 Y- K" @: @4 r其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
6 b% C4 Y. r5 w  Z; b5 }但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？+ K. m7 h, G: h6 S) J# d, I+ e
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
  |4 H$ _5 y3 Z% n# }8 H又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。2 ]' f# J& A. `% ~% j6 ?
+ K/ M- [0 x4 u& }5 W/ m
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 U* u4 c' B7 M9 U5 [# c% v9 s所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，. F0 k5 i% r$ d6 r/ s  s8 {
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。8 i9 n9 Z; N$ O# y
) h6 ?. d) a4 v6 u# P1 k6 g. @
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，% G6 g2 j7 h9 Z1 C1 o- F
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，, H1 e. C* O5 x5 t* Z+ V  e
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 }5 o( ~. m/ M1 c7 r! C
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，& S, n: l( `4 C7 k) s9 U
M 都可算壞了。1 S$ |$ Y5 M7 y! n

, E- e( L1 r: g F 呢個人仲掂，; n  F7 Y: g5 n& S1 C/ ?
知道既唔等於要講，2 U9 d% Q; Q" G: Z3 [
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. ^* z$ J, r; o4 T4 J我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
1 ]% D" @8 u! Y, ~4 l+ N5 a% C( A7 _0 x! Z9 R
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
. V( B* [/ E- f- _7 `0 A始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
3 _! f7 i6 o( j  P$ S
+ a9 N! K2 N; d) p: R
' F0 C9 z8 U5 \2 U% A3 U/ G% [8 a( X1 W' G
題外話：
% |4 n" h& U) ]唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
$ F3 V% P- i" u" A1 v. H) |睇到 S 呢條友，
1 ]9 }5 [: N) J$ V8 P我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L- h3 W4 u# S" [0 c* r9 V
0 E" o& h! C- N. z/ k3 G
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!6 Q: d: _) a1 Y& z: M' x+ H
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
# _6 E2 d- l5 I& {, s8 MM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
4 W  ~1 N/ `5 z7 NB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
  y4 B- r4 u$ j2 |L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...