Rika

由最好排到最壞
# s7 {2 l) @0 GF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong& u# b; }5 s6 Y" D  j; i
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount+ G  h! i% P/ r$ V* o* H* M5 K" F
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ u3 A, M: J1 D. z7 h: m: S0 J
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure+ o5 Q. u$ E. Z, Z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
1 z* t/ J5 z; n7 b  c* m, D- ?" H# @+ [# D' v
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
# d0 x: U. p0 m7 W& c0 R. _" h3 I; E/ O; ?4 g( f0 ^. o
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 N: j. d& k: `% S
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
( X8 A" F9 {5 P: O. x+ C, h" E( E2 a. O
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
, q# R- x, J) v
9 @6 {& G# ~. F4 L2 ~4 J* @L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志' W9 Q6 z% j2 I
5 s/ U5 k9 d4 q) ^. F( k
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# C( m8 D" s. n) t, J     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; C* H2 h; Y* t5 c: x3 \* R
% n: Z! e6 {6 E: i: p! W4 k
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 P/ o% K6 m: k9 Q2 E1 e而家答多次/ L8 d" W( t' c6 r" _/ X5 H, z6 s  s7 }
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
& y& Q; N1 E) y) m8 Gl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
7 D2 g% Y/ t$ yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 V1 h* G, e2 Q; _7 ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 W! l! r6 E8 G
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. V" s' n+ n6 {" {0 e, e  @# \) _- V7 k/ ~, h
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大6 f$ [) k" z1 Y1 E
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
& ^$ F- y: {3 o. @/ ?+ l) fM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
' i, U: b) w3 F; l4 B! a* ?S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
' c( m$ I6 H4 ?% D' r2 Y" o& ~B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞# ?; z; O8 N- R" A0 g
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
8 v' d! S1 [& ~3 N( g( J+ U9 AS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
4 \4 n# U+ b- o/ D" N6 nM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法. P' _, t& u3 U- S" \
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果# x1 O# _, R' l" s; M- J1 ^
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
* ]8 q9 `' ]. C! ~" ?6 C* H, g9 b: n% u
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 E* N3 d3 w8 R+ o/ V8 A4 q9 f) ?L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
9 {1 Y" I3 d* b: _. [1 O% AB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘7 {0 ]9 K" R  f2 R9 R* b) n( O4 P3 H
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件9 Y8 G& v7 [4 L3 Z. W# E0 v: y
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方- E+ l8 k3 q4 P2 {1 P1 N" p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

) [* v0 ~" K, \" x; B. ^- T
/ X1 E# s7 ^1 c3 q/ a6 @ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
7 x9 E" [" y' _7 _9 T7 Z6 C, {+ w3 s2 b
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river    v2 ?! s' D/ \: ^
+ [* C* Y- G: U0 h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )) g9 T% O& j! t$ F% r
9 K% \( ~1 C2 A% W  S+ a% y% L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
" t8 @  T( F# p, P0 z( \; }& n5 Y- |5 X4 g2 D1 b/ A: a
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......$ {& w% l( n# a9 a3 Y6 V

8 {3 G1 t7 o: W9 g[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
. X" t5 z/ ?  e' d6 m0 vM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢' \& R. X; ?* `  o8 T0 z0 l& f' @1 P
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ X) p4 U( d" F8 }# sF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
/ r! n' F- L6 a. O( W3 a. M5 k  u1 W  |6 c0 I
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% V, m, N9 R0 `
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
4 I) b) f# B$ {& d5 t# M由最好開始排起既話，
) S; c) A" v! i: i, m+ y& xL B M F S 啦，
( ~% ]) {( d8 \; r( i2 N7 V  [1 D/ |" h$ `
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，  @5 ~0 B+ L7 m$ g7 p  }
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 z5 ~! F, W0 O$ l/ W5 ^; ?# [
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？. N1 }  S% j5 [5 H7 E, j1 H
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
7 L0 C( M, v: J0 F" n& q
0 q1 Y7 D- B: j8 C7 D6 D% p而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
: M  e. _  B& T& e" e) H, U+ e所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
! k* H; N; }% V# ?" J明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
7 B/ C2 @5 W8 G  R& O" U) F. x( g, l- @( N" w
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
8 v6 ?! h. z! M( w) M; s! h- T/ s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，, a5 D/ i+ @7 ~3 v9 u8 J; l, ~5 \
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
, N9 h* u# }! @4 E1 E知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
1 z/ l6 t' P3 `+ W4 l1 o M 都可算壞了。: ~+ |: u6 Q7 ]; U

$ q# `3 n3 K1 p( \  q. Q( P9 ? F 呢個人仲掂，
) {& O9 h) M9 i0 W知道既唔等於要講，
( `  q/ d' J+ r& s/ G如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
2 T9 d) ~& Q) e+ \8 R我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。6 _% e: a; N; A

! V1 \. f) Y! T  |最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 X  A2 E3 T' Y3 W
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。2 o" v' V6 l3 V" |* |
2 ?' E% S& u6 e0 _. T
, a) f0 ]* i- }7 o7 }

" p* J9 s% b8 a- v題外話：
: m2 X7 U! w% p唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，( a# z, E" y7 I5 x1 L- v1 v
睇到 S 呢條友，8 [/ }. b- R; d- a
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
5 k/ [' e2 ?- C
! l9 J7 h& }  N* m/ J2 CS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!8 s' Q! p( V  R# s1 n  \
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係1 \: U* e) @; P4 Q' C+ s
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
; l" n0 V5 Y5 |+ YB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害, v* v9 |1 [% t( _' K- L: t: w9 h
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...