Rika

由最好排到最壞. }7 \8 ?7 b  Z3 ^0 k
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong" j4 q; ]( T$ Y7 C( p) r7 G
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
% h8 }! t. f8 A* `- _* |, @S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
4 j, s  z" T' u/ uM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
! o3 ^' O6 B8 N" dL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
$ \, ?+ I! A! D! T/ x+ x
) j/ i  A/ P0 g7 x2 pM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人4 W+ M: {+ w9 `

3 a6 U4 V# `6 S, OS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)8 w, s0 O! l: P! ?/ l
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
6 _0 S- l- {, D$ ^% F. Y5 r, O  S" i
+ \1 W9 X0 D0 O# O* C) HB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做1 v% h' O1 C1 k9 N
% E1 m1 S$ @1 j+ Q5 g7 I
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
) O/ b3 n9 o4 G$ S
3 g" x% Z- ]5 T. ?' UF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,8 A/ f& x" ]$ D. j
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' b' A6 X9 Z8 {3 a  e0 `# ]( i

9 c8 u. l, K0 f& B[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% E5 p# n/ b2 J% a* R8 b
而家答多次2 E9 p$ @: D& C( h: H( o! P
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- }0 ?: Y& u, j/ _; f
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
1 p7 |6 y4 }8 D( O. Db: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
8 X' ]0 v( J$ H$ ^) Es: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
) _# m/ R6 s- Lm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# f5 g) z* J3 r" E+ P: k0 Y0 l* y: F5 r! j
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大2 y3 K% R0 S4 b: u# h% C
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% }$ S2 H$ x4 j: aM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
& z% O- l9 j& s6 \& wS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢, M! K' V! d6 A+ H5 ~2 l+ E- c
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 i0 [1 E- e$ pF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& k$ a9 A! x; O9 D* N4 @
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
: F' m# h4 I% a# e/ |! Q7 iM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
' @9 t6 H" R  M) n, e1 wL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
) V: C0 k4 Y- v$ jB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
" q& z: ~  Y+ |4 l3 u4 q& I$ a# _
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 h1 E, ~% O6 L0 Y
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" T; o+ l# d6 |7 \# |2 gB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
  ?, P/ d: ~# F1 V) c5 DS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
9 d, [/ q$ n. z! [: c2 D1 WF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
0 O, W5 f3 }4 K- {0 s5 EM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ k; e0 b) D/ d! D

) N  D1 ]4 F% i/ o9 c" M: J1 b8 P same choices with u , but want to add some comments , q* f& g* ?( ^" L
! F" ?) _. I4 R3 ^
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ' g3 [7 t4 N+ ?& g7 S4 @2 ]& f
9 ?$ v' z( y! T( c
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
* z; @" N. \  ~( x/ g& c
/ o( ]2 M& w0 x1 E% AF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
8 S5 O" M; [5 ]) q8 k4 \5 p; s& s+ d! Z4 d
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
0 Q+ O4 O( [' A4 U$ |0 x) V4 {, G
' [. o* t! _; h- c[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge+ q: ?. W1 g3 W: I6 F
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 j" X  C- Q, B% @+ ]
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
5 W9 a8 m5 o* t& d( ]' _1 PF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& ?& t* H- {; G- Q. b0 Y( ?/ w
1 t' b+ D( w- |6 f; h
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% @9 ]: M0 I5 O9 d
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
/ Z8 d* r3 o4 u. ?' Q# j  `5 t由最好開始排起既話，
" S, x$ r. h! C3 m. JL B M F S 啦，
( _" k& Y1 b" H- O. G8 g
; j6 A/ Q$ r2 P  \! Q其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- I. ^" L) D1 E7 E0 D但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？) b4 b3 h& x- S
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？6 z0 S4 i+ {' U* F0 G# U2 V
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。& T% z: u9 C9 h, m$ ?6 e

# v( m; G6 y  S0 Y6 u而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 M; ^  b9 N2 p% }2 t/ L, `
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
* p  ?4 x" |' [, Q' w" r明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
% L" ^$ a2 J$ Q9 _! s6 |9 m7 l: `
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
0 f. ]6 l  o- N$ o+ N M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，" r/ {/ Y) h# t6 S* e% Z/ V3 W! N- i) b
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
2 ?* m% ~# N5 d: W. H知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
! R* J  ?: \" r/ e& e. E& @ M 都可算壞了。
3 a: ~$ a+ k- t* H& t) {% [  A% Y6 f
F 呢個人仲掂，3 h  T( p# `& w$ q* x9 T
知道既唔等於要講，3 F. ]" N2 P/ f* r
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，7 j0 h, L' X8 x* L4 K8 g" V
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
; _9 k+ z7 s9 a. i3 V" t  T# T1 a, N) z# A% G
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
* i" _' z& p; w8 @8 A. {始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
5 P. w1 K, D$ ^' G6 Y3 |8 g, J# g' [* }

7 e9 J/ @+ P) m; U. _+ n- [% F( N' K" X( d( i/ H: U1 K5 i. ~1 x% u
題外話：
# ?& c; ~- M+ d7 b& K& K2 |  P唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，2 r5 m7 u" O8 ?7 a) u# E! l. J
睇到 S 呢條友，
. H4 ?- v7 t; O6 Q$ j8 z8 j- Z9 w" d2 Y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L* g7 o- }$ F  C/ Q4 W$ l1 H  d6 k" {) E

0 D5 ^* W  d/ T8 QS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!& J9 F7 `1 i, {# v
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
  `' G. S6 ^4 q5 e: |% M# SM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
0 Y6 n' u( n! ]; @, U" sB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. Z; e" S4 F5 {L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...