Rika

由最好排到最壞
0 D% v/ D5 L; q0 G/ s3 _F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong$ u5 L1 \* m0 p" [$ r% [
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 v9 t6 y- ~! n0 R' \" p: F9 Q( b
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
9 ^- X  U6 U8 d2 w# OM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
% n2 Y+ Y/ Q  g0 p) ~$ \5 I: M5 oL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* ^8 s" U+ H+ N& V/ G0 g3 I3 ^
% r2 g& G! a1 u; n4 E8 y- q
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: D9 m- j; S! E8 k- o3 I1 K+ q% B7 J1 B" I8 O
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)# i9 W+ E  n, W' V. W
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
- T' L5 K' _, W5 j1 j
- U7 i# E1 `! `* f8 jB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- @# J$ T8 l4 I! @# `+ i7 F
& O& e, f& b; H& P$ O! b1 s7 TL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志9 v2 W- z% G. g7 J% w5 j

; q' v; @6 [% Q/ A2 bF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,: _  Q' i2 v  K# i
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好( m4 |- [& r* Z2 J" w
* B( w- h2 z! I0 `" c  c
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案" B. M! R5 P( V$ U( j: c5 m
而家答多次. a- Q8 f, X! H: h
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽6 |" \' I, |8 R; k2 q+ s
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
% v' l& |4 Z* C: hb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
- a* L) M. @$ S+ Ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
0 }9 u( F! |. sm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S5 t8 u: j8 F- n* W

! c; b1 Y* m/ H+ e- k3 U( vL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
6 r& b2 f3 \/ b3 a8 c- i1 y$ ^0 jF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
6 D: e9 s% @2 h! `M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
0 z6 p% s% Z8 ]) y+ E, r; RS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢% r* z2 D, g' A  d) n
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞# E6 U1 V6 ?4 @  O. _2 [0 L+ d
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默") [! h) q1 s; I9 e
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取$ |0 B$ r; |1 f  Y
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
2 \! V" `& ]1 P& \6 c+ ~L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 n5 v7 a2 H; S2 U' [. IB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 S2 U& S# a( S! h/ A
/ ]3 k% y  }9 C# b3 p8 k7 l
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
- Y, @. L- E/ X6 EL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己* Q% @+ M' E6 A' j) w
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘' S4 K% C+ `. Z8 d
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
6 B- \) k7 c5 A# m1 Z2 p2 RF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 Y3 ?: h, Y' fM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* p! W' E# [9 T7 U
0 M) Z1 o9 h) j' ?5 j9 i same choices with u , but want to add some comments
' C0 d4 l+ f, Q
8 L) {0 T& ?+ M1 L/ C* zB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
7 o3 [. {, e8 }" w# r. {7 v3 c" {* }- k; O9 m, a
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )0 u) I( V- W; Z( H5 c% Y8 z- H& \

1 R2 {) @: Q2 O6 pF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
, ?. R: V7 F* S2 f& c! `- ?) ?7 S  A" t3 O' D% |/ y' @9 J/ Q
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
9 Y7 k) \; N  |- v  u
' p( ?' _9 f( W  }9 w  Z% l8 V" ?[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# _( t1 K; O4 |2 z: Q* e$ X3 h4 tM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  J  d# |5 h5 \6 F$ Z4 p
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點( L$ S9 D7 P6 r2 Q" E
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
! L, T. \( P: J- C8 n
) b: r; _1 L& D1 H$ B最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
6 K7 U/ C9 o: v, o4 p, y6 ?有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，  K& C2 x1 ^- Y: E+ u* k) a8 G: [
由最好開始排起既話，
7 n4 k' A* M  p# EL B M F S 啦，
/ i, d! O  D) r0 X: [  {
; U; K+ j+ W/ `3 T3 i3 ^3 ~2 Q; N* l其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
  d3 z8 K: s: w! J; ~' r- Q3 j但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？" M5 I% d& i9 w* {( F
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
" y- n8 l9 m) ^' _又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。- X! K3 A) p, E" v) ~

& x& I5 U0 N( u' V而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，; T6 o( C! S3 E8 k/ r" x$ o
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
" m$ {' A9 j" g明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* r( Q8 H8 A" O# T
4 F6 i0 u- j( z  S5 w2 u而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，' c9 S# F- P0 n# Y. r
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
+ b& c- K- U: X/ K% C亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* i5 g5 ~4 [# K$ s9 ?, F
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: Z% y- Q6 S& L, L5 I
M 都可算壞了。
$ Z( |7 u8 H6 R
: g' H8 U& B0 i7 p8 w( T. s F 呢個人仲掂，
) K6 o7 ^0 I# ^知道既唔等於要講，
* g" z  e1 b# l) K9 W$ d  e2 @如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
5 c' o6 E: g7 h, e: a我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。6 F8 ?& u$ ~2 E" J: A9 U! ~4 k

% r! T, B, ]  K  S2 |5 m% h7 U最衰個個緊係 S 啦，8 n4 B7 R7 v% }/ Z0 W( D  |
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。$ D% b' l' @% u. q( s; Y

. a1 l, L& B+ @/ h' [% ~4 r2 N7 p% N0 |: Q7 G6 `6 {8 U& Q( X' V
# D. C$ c3 x7 y  E
題外話：+ r9 B6 z5 ]& T5 z, @
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
# S7 y2 j# Q$ J# ~4 s% i, s- f睇到 S 呢條友，
& z9 X$ r, ?9 ?; e我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ r3 k0 ]# m$ g8 T) ^! z' Q- N- I) H2 h) x) F
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
& E3 ~& V/ C3 g4 QF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 c4 ^- F/ |& G1 M+ `0 \M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
3 F$ y& M" O; }$ OB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害4 g8 W  N" |$ `
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...