Rika

由最好排到最壞
; E( [7 C  [. gF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
* r. j( l1 T% p3 i1 Y! v7 {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ Z" r; U: G3 x& Z/ Y& W9 CS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her+ [9 S: ^. u5 Z, t
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
2 @$ u0 z+ _2 WL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* I- ?0 [  Y3 C3 O( V! _0 c) s
( X4 S6 T- Z& H( q7 Q6 E: V
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ ^3 K7 t0 {8 I) |5 n* N2 B$ P( a! B

& G, q  G* D+ D" g4 H0 x1 [S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
, A4 W- m0 U- }6 G  |; L' m     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
5 g. G8 j. I: N( \% C( R1 M4 ~- V6 i, `/ g) R9 _" V0 A
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做# ~4 M& a! y& B* _* S

" L( O/ T; A% ?, j" nL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志7 E' r+ [+ R/ M$ [

9 m% b/ s' [( T  T3 q( gF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) k6 ^( i& P5 \. r$ _- T' x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
1 ]) n  }# V/ b# P- C( ?
& h% G: O/ W- T% A- C[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
. T. ]- o! s; t. U! f而家答多次! C7 Y! O# L8 w- U! q
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- K. r. J  i( P6 D; Y
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 C: h1 U: R& N# b" u) ]$ [
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 p3 a( \- |1 }
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.0 U4 Z  T* E' _
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 i* P* L) C6 p3 B- p
& Y2 V6 O0 U- b7 B+ d
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大7 d4 ]6 w# R7 d. L9 K
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度& J! n" K9 o5 B# q& c9 a
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* r  j# E( y% z! T1 A% RS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
3 W& C/ {" d# E1 Y5 YB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞- Q/ `0 Y( f$ v! o, K
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
' _& M; U- C+ T# f$ \( g+ fS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 g9 S( [; u6 A% e7 E7 o
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
0 P5 \& ]/ a  Q4 mL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
4 t# _! F& b* s4 m' l5 X6 \4 r1 a# `B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情$ X, y3 h* g  K& ^

% V; W2 z+ K! I/ O; I6 S# v世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
: g, U+ r' f- G; f: s- r% n- hL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
  x# f  C" y9 K% {* z6 ^9 `B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘9 `# D5 ?, `8 l5 }; V- }
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件$ U7 Z8 Q; y0 S& F. M$ y
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
. R' s# m1 Z$ }2 j$ f' lM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

" F- w  o8 K& i& ^* V4 I
0 V% \- r# v' n
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
/ @2 i5 M2 g1 ~" F) J  @" g8 p0 b" B# W
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  5 U. L  [! Q1 ^2 F- b! ~
/ k# `6 U' r( O# N5 J
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
% o! z5 E; S9 L4 ~& F& d; u9 q. S) w; a, e: G0 y* H4 V
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome + @% ]+ b, E$ [
3 g, ?3 a4 Z! Y
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; C! v4 N* x+ M2 {5 y3 m: P8 z. y. `/ a; f
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
0 J  l/ s- j1 y+ e2 ?: `M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' {$ A. H3 i5 b. R- iL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點% |! M7 Z2 A0 A* c3 k
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
. b3 g. w/ @% u, ~& w1 C" R( g- h. m
2 C6 p; t2 r5 o1 r; }最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% H: I( S6 ^3 e
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
* ?: I) q& }) i4 l) c9 `% T由最好開始排起既話，
/ M& w' y! i- h; ]) t8 ?L B M F S 啦，
- j6 r8 B% P0 G+ D! m
5 N) i1 z/ {: D* U, T6 x' H其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
7 x9 k9 V, K4 X9 H9 d9 L/ q- l7 a但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
: _9 k3 a8 g$ c9 t/ P, O如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？% W! |) ^' T) E" h8 v, Q. X
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 V8 b- I- B; s* R3 P$ g( M. v
7 y3 j7 `3 X+ x/ I: Z2 H; @而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ P& a# y3 w) p! K% D6 X# K
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
2 g, S% v5 ~. ?. C4 X# V& D明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* s! H4 y0 |, V5 F: D5 }
: Q) g0 \$ X. S+ B2 i  O而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，/ @* p5 I- A' y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，$ u: ]8 |, L3 Y) r. s
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
; a6 f/ Y' g4 [/ I4 n3 W; N知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 ~7 C5 W$ t; w- R6 t
M 都可算壞了。. W6 x; `4 h: c$ G- f5 }
# g: f- _4 S( s2 u) K3 K0 w
F 呢個人仲掂，
# ~5 ^( b# ~$ o" ?/ S4 ~, H知道既唔等於要講，
8 [' l1 S* u; M) z  W) _4 P' M如果呢件事發生係自己身上，6 B* M$ E: f' P$ q
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。- z! l7 S5 y. ~1 H! [7 @
" D& g5 f, `: b9 x7 K
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ G/ X. e& l: n" F4 \( K- \始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
3 @! p: u4 R+ Q5 t! m) I" g! h/ P9 P/ Q4 E+ S' k( K6 P

$ v+ J( M, J+ H0 b1 e) W
9 }0 Q( A6 [: V  }' S% Y題外話：% b: ?1 j, s. g7 {& q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，9 H3 R  c* B" h, I, ^
睇到 S 呢條友，
$ k5 {; t3 Z7 J我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
+ b# l$ c& b/ U+ B% U
, ?4 K' o* B% \3 {5 @+ R& \S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
' P1 y1 {- ~1 A8 t9 }% r% @F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
# |: b$ z9 R: G& M- Y+ ~, gM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她4 u: P* U, ?/ a2 M, D; O
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害2 z; A# i/ J0 z. r
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...