奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
3 q& r9 T: b& C0 P! f5 _$ p" a# }, J* V, f
agree,
# ?0 w' Q+ ]' s# u; a$ S  D! Q我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
: c  D5 ]3 @" P. D3 A+ g但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
! K- d( v# ~9 h, \4 k- o( ], ^" v期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ C" n4 A# L4 d' B0 ~) f
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" O$ [: L9 I3 k4 D  ]4 C
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地9 L) @1 ^/ t# Z, Y0 c
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.: U& B0 R- n* D0 x
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:. u% E/ N/ s( p+ W+ v
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ , i2 ^! Q1 q" n7 Q" H0 q; j3 I
3 K9 W0 r/ z) I# Q. t6 H, q
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
# A# A! z9 \) |4 V6 i6 n8 `4 [. F4 g3 C+ |2 m# @9 p3 c- J
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

1 X: }, J/ R" n8 v2 S4 g3 l$ M7 x) d0 d! Q( J+ `; Q3 }* @' \. \2 M
絕對支持啦) Y" V' O" ^1 v2 r* i3 m" @

  \4 I. }8 J8 ?  R% O4 F! J有錯就認,打就企定
% W$ _; J$ ?6 d4 i3 {( B. l% t7 B+ u- p! w5 U5 }! G* d7 u
無錯當然要撐到底# `+ D4 S: X3 q0 J2 v& ?) [
3 W+ y! V6 u* X6 \1 N$ y8 j. k1 C
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩1 u" M9 H( ~" E% h9 ^

1 h. \' U$ l2 V4 M; K在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得# e0 |5 M5 e% S) l+ T7 N

9 V& R- T; F7 ?( n, J, d一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& ^1 a! E! c$ J  z/ J/ v: p! @. ]8 y
" g8 U% L7 a2 k
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生+ T' M; }0 ?" V$ d

* E# _3 I6 L% p唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
% k. q* _9 o  v7 C6 V  C; H& i1 M! `4 u& a; I1 o
我唔認為lor
1 L6 o# C9 n4 _1 S" h; n8 v. n+ b3 Y
唔係話要整死佢地0 `- S2 _% R3 B% p* |

4 M) a' E( i2 Y' b而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
: x+ w  ^7 r7 y: v% r. X/ k7 T5 S6 y+ W( f) B
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
9 p% B: P9 T6 r+ _& j$ h
8 T& v2 L5 V& e, ]- G有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
6 n5 v$ P* C( k0 ^7 X5 y1 Z9 H6 v# }5 Z% z+ n& g+ r
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
: L2 l/ u& J4 p# [6 g% z. f; V& ]* u3 ^7 S
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 X. G( E; r5 O8 P7 {/ L
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  y6 S7 t8 S; J& W; p
: o8 B, P( a% V8 `
我們的大學生; b3 b" h% Q0 v$ `

3 Y0 C2 \$ I; M* j" x  X6 p8 n8 d( r# H: z
. Z* i& h& X% d- F
2 v8 ^$ T8 E' N+ @  r& u" p: J: l& E; a  |4 U% j9 V

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:, M6 H- H. c: W- S6 N9 T

' P# `0 h; a. W  A! m( Q- P: k6 ?5 X) d  ]/ e- E. [
有見地 !!!
1 I% ^) d. t4 t7 e現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 f) E' ]; \( }; k: @6 I4 G
+ s, T0 o! u# }I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
4 Q) s7 x8 f5 f* OI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 7 _5 U. m. D& ]& o) U
I pretty sad that about the University official.6 R1 ^) v( L3 ]; O& i+ n0 R! q: q
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
6 k& I2 |+ A. C
) N& u) J- E4 D" ?5 c. w[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
8 U* z% Z% S3 X; [% Y/ @我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 r. ^7 C2 r, C
, V7 l/ D5 {$ E, Z
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, H/ l4 t2 b; c6 n* |4 y
, n& G, Z! P) ?+ t兩者有何分別?
# y8 ~4 B; W( G: q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?