奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
2 D' M2 U2 h% @" J
0 `: f" m: B; o+ ]# @0 {2 qagree,0 ?3 `' B, B! {+ [, w4 m" L- H8 D
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,6 ~7 ?5 b6 J7 n) l5 ^
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
( w" g8 ~; @& I! h期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

, f1 H8 P" A5 g; P
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  [: t0 L$ m% n+ `2 B2 W2 Y2 j# ~/ a
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地0 V% `: F: f4 h+ ~
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
( V3 x4 B- v1 DJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:: H# U& Z5 x% L6 ~9 M; ~' f
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
5 d) P; ^. z% }  u" Y; a7 ^, t$ q3 t+ f' e; k: ]4 J( r
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
1 I0 _* }, p* s) ]( `  ]
' o6 R- L: U9 r3 v; K7 [為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

5 S# u' }: @  N+ \- I/ z2 d6 \" p3 |3 I& y% r" N. m# Z& W
絕對支持啦
( b. ]- I, w) V/ \# w& e) `2 C* w6 j
有錯就認,打就企定
: g0 a8 X+ J, K$ R; Y7 g
1 s2 F, i; N0 T7 S& n; m6 ^無錯當然要撐到底" c3 Q  {/ a: d3 s4 L

, c6 k8 I, \: Y9 {但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
& ?4 ]3 h6 g  n; Z% F/ L0 {: c2 c" l: q# \' G- n/ N
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
3 _$ p# C3 A( p
" w9 `  }. ?( h' T2 Z/ ^2 Q一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
1 Y0 E2 S$ F' i/ V2 a& H; w$ f* k. x- I) P, _+ _& t
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
% O: S, L3 l0 }& _% Q' f, K- A* u# K1 B$ s* [0 `( r
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
& m+ k1 J4 h; s: @* `+ T5 `5 q
1 X$ y; s) x3 y5 y$ ^我唔認為lor+ B/ D: B4 M) |& Z6 n% U

4 v* M+ j6 E- j) O5 e) q唔係話要整死佢地
8 A: C  p, P; k) Z; v
" f, w+ P  ?% ^9 h7 f9 {4 J% D而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
$ O4 ^4 G/ D  ~' @6 X* R" W* D1 m4 j. P; q' n* o. |* `3 l( z
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大; R) L  I  q1 \, l% i2 M

  i- b& N+ \+ S3 U+ v0 w有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的1 C0 c! o# G, l- J  L% Q- ?
3 i/ ?" ]) G9 w8 n( h+ T
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
' H, v0 P" V- D8 |' s* c2 q! g- c5 c3 n0 I
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
0 R0 v* ~. s% Y- d( D# s- _2 ]"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
# r" n: ~+ d" a5 D2 {9 U- t8 I. k* V
我們的大學生
% ]2 o' s; }' Q. \
  K7 {1 ]7 ~- X; n8 C4 K: I: K; m& h- ^3 o: o+ Y

( W: M  p* n4 Q! O* \
% ?& b0 q* [* e' o0 l4 j; t8 I: T

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:& N6 H7 M+ i3 ]1 s: u2 i$ _

7 t* ~: J! ?" W5 p
: g3 ^  O9 e5 X' v有見地 !!!) e; Y2 ^5 @; K+ L' [( o8 \: R
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" P5 b2 l3 p3 D, i5 k5 j$ B
& Q, Y) R# J3 I. f1 q. u
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
2 Y2 n7 V% z: y/ Y& _- ^& tI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* N/ K' F$ N3 ]) g" T5 FI pretty sad that about the University official.
/ B4 ]& L& }* q% w2 S- d& d% Z: S" yIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 V4 s6 {8 T/ R2 x; ~3 q/ |+ w0 i
/ l% w2 s" }( s) i( C% P7 j[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
5 M7 R8 F2 ^  r, m( {我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la/ @1 f# S& o: T. n, x0 \$ m

2 x& u; }" n: Q7 L$ d* j[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

& S( I. S$ p7 Z+ B) n% V, J
. B* k  _6 K& y) g8 n  `
兩者有何分別?9 k; U$ m! r+ P% o
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?