奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' j! j: ^4 A9 [' U; v" _% E7 R
, H8 N; M) Y7 }- ]  b8 v$ z9 X
agree,
" u* n4 ^" b/ o) b3 @- `. j我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
& }8 _% w# G8 ~/ K( F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ h9 m9 |7 K$ M) u5 `9 p4 X
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

( L* |: ]- \# v6 s* t9 K. Q7 \, `  F
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 B% p! _: \8 ]1 e) ?3 k已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地$ G2 O- c" I% [# M9 o: z' L; H
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
; X8 R& i! ]! p0 V2 E* yJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
. N: K% ~; s/ K2 B: U/ M有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
: m5 h6 C% r! Y+ \0 U. K7 z; Z5 L: N# {3 l  ]: q5 n/ `
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???8 Q9 R: ~6 ~: [# U; B' j

3 n: g; Q1 j" m0 Z& T2 J7 l4 x$ b為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

6 ?5 w2 R+ ?1 w$ s' Z" a( d
1 ]* z  Z: Y7 K" u% j絕對支持啦9 n; J; z2 M2 _1 ]; @& t* Z, y
, Z( [. _% y' p7 F
有錯就認,打就企定
$ e/ q% Y6 C" Z( b0 ?" N7 O4 }+ \8 M: D4 _
無錯當然要撐到底4 @2 y2 j; {8 j! X5 s  N
- G  S6 j$ z* b+ W$ N" S
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 H6 l1 [0 W1 E3 M: W7 p, x5 d6 Q5 H

& {5 b2 N  Q" b' Y- Z在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ [+ \8 u' M1 K5 l# J3 G
  o. Q+ D5 u$ Y& L  m) O一份公眾讀物係好有影響力- u$ h3 L8 K: v/ ?( B
# w+ @& a" ]$ g' h: @9 F9 L* G# ~
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
7 x/ L/ L# A' }: ~* c5 r( X6 O
6 f/ L9 K: H* i2 ~4 m8 S% n唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?: S6 o5 @" R1 C# |2 l

$ R) o- r& L+ E2 f& d2 E; f我唔認為lor
( `' p3 D+ f6 l0 ?. e6 D1 N
$ t. N( \3 [3 i唔係話要整死佢地* G7 a6 ^) v! ]: K6 s, Y" y' {: P

; i9 ~  T& [# }* G8 [6 Z" l而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用  ^6 ?. g0 L( j4 \- L9 s
: i9 L2 d; t, m& {. P
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
/ y# |# Q6 Y! c  e( o4 G% q( S; c: w/ g) _( `. D, s9 A
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的( D$ _& n0 Z4 O
0 e% O% |! \- x4 i) _: p
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
) U: P7 E+ X2 |. l
* s2 q4 c" w& A& U  k大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
% d) M" F2 P& C! K) o; T. w"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
* M2 ^$ d* @8 E% |
# `3 Y) A" G# x6 F我們的大學生
8 |. H' C1 `: }" s8 ^/ o
1 z, I, f9 S6 u/ j) I# d. m3 f  s2 D$ H+ h
) e: |- \2 z& h  r8 k
( F6 W: V6 j8 j8 d1 d% K( r) v. T

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
% u: w/ l4 m" @" p/ X" K
" T. O/ w4 t7 B" `
- T: o( r8 |: ~3 j7 b5 }有見地 !!!
$ E( K+ g5 a2 r: n. _現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- B3 ^8 v% r* c2 N& P" P+ z" G
0 g* U1 G9 {0 c1 Q6 G( r( i
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
" Y1 g  p# k' y, J) k) YI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- B% ~" J# B/ u  [1 u6 X: [# HI pretty sad that about the University official.
& n; @: a' x3 R5 T8 U8 RIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
( q( c, F& W, i1 t. v# E& B5 n9 l( X* M& n" ?+ W
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
! D" y; ~0 f; }4 a% t! G我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
( [3 z0 S& x2 [( x2 p0 z5 I0 b. Y9 y, c- W5 ]
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 Q3 {) C" N& i1 Y5 W6 s& S

# |  N% _" N& }7 P" |9 ?兩者有何分別?
, k+ I3 c" H: |& h" Q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?