|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
& G9 Q. n* G, |( L! h, dCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,! g2 c" H d% H% X" h
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
+ u& g' ?& j- |2 j2 ~0 g( ^- t/ Pmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
9 l# C& ?+ X. |in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.9 w7 H5 B+ g. _4 D' z- ]" I
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency. T7 U+ N! F# X2 Q
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times," m* o! {0 M v- t3 _9 Y* H9 Q
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 5 D* s1 O1 t, R9 E7 Y; P
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 3 d+ F; {/ V6 H$ M& E
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
, V- E C7 h* U8 u: i1 Y w) l& G* D9 j. {. e7 {$ U4 V
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
& ?$ D. H8 V. N6 lin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
* Q! [! T! k: BFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
\* X4 ]( U* C+ _( [A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.! b1 ]0 ]% O A, @( P
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. - u! [/ G p. r8 J
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
8 o% V _1 N# i2 }, k7 W+ o Q; P% Y! N) n
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|